Mapping the signal-to-noise-ratios of cortical sources in magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography

Human Brain Mapping

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 1077-1086

  Goldenholz, Daniel M ^a,b   Ahlfors, Seppo P ^a,c   Hämäläinen, Matti S ^a,c   Sharon, Dahlia ^a   Ishitobi, Mamiko ^a   Vaina, Lucia M ^a,b,d   Stufflebeam, Steven M ^a,c  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Boston University   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain; Cortex; Dipole; EEG; Epilepsy; Forward model; MEG; Simulation; SNR

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EPILEPSY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SIMULATION; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HAMARTOMA; HUMANS; HYPOTHALAMUS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NOISE; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 63849158689     PISSN: 10659471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20571     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ahonen AI, Hämäläinen MS, Ilmoniemi RJ, Kajola MJ, Knuutila JE, Simola JT, Vilkman VA (1993): Sampling theory for neuromagnetic detector arrays. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 40:859-869.
2. Babiloni F, Babiloni C, Carducci F, Romani GL, Rossini PM, Angelone LM, Cincotti F (2004): Multimodal integration of EEG and MEG data: a simulation study with variable signal-to-noise ratio and number of sensors. Hum Brain Mapp 22:52-62.
3. Barkley GL, Baumgartner C (2003): MEG and EEG in epilepsy. J Clin Neurophysiol 20:163-178.
4. Baumgartner C (2004): Controversies in clinical neurophysiology. MEG is superior to EEG in the localization of interictal epileptiform activity: Con. Clin Neurophysiol 115:1010-1020.
5. Baumgartner C, Pataraia E, Lindinger G, Deecke L (2000): Neuromagnetic recordings in temporal lobe epilepsy. J Clin Neurophysiol 17:177-189.
6. Cobb WA, editor (1983): IFCN Recommendations For The Practice Of Clinical Neurophysiology. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
7. Cohen D (1972): Magnetoencephalography: Detection of the brain's electrical activity with a superconducting magnetometer. Science 175:664-666.
8. Cohen D, Cuffin BN (1983): Demonstration of useful differences between magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 56:38-51.
9. Cohen D, Cuffin BN, Yunokuchi K, Maniewski R, Purcell C, Cosgrove GR, Ives J, Kennedy JG, Schomer DL (1990): MEG versus EEG localization test using implanted sources in the human brain. Ann Neurol 28:811-817.
10. Crouzeix A, Yvert B, Bertrand O, Pernier J (1999): An evaluation of dipole reconstruction accuracy with spherical and realistic head models in MEG. Clin Neurophysiol 110:2176-2188.
11. Cuffin BN, Cohen D (1979): Comparison of the magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 47:132-146.
12. Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI (1999): Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction Neuroimage 9:179-194.
13. de Jongh A, de Munck JC, Goncalves SI, Ossenblok P (2005): Differences in MEG/EEG epileptic spike yields explained by regional differences in signal-to-noise ratios. J Clin Neurophysiol 22:153-158.
14. de Munck JC, Vijn PC, Lopes da Silva FH (1992): A random dipole model for spontaneous brain activity. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 39:791-804.
15. Dijkstra EW (1959): A note on two problems in connection with graphs. Numeriche Mathematik 1,269-271.
16. Ebersole JS, Pedley TA, editors (2002): Current Practice of Clinical Electroenchalography. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p 974.
17. Eulitz C, Eulitz H, Elbert T (1997): Differential outcomes from magneto-and electroencephalography for the analysis of human cognition. Neurosci Lett 227:185-188.
18. Fischl B, Sereno MI, Dale AM (1999a) Cortical surface-based analysis. II: Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage 9:195-207.
19. Fischl B, Sereno MI, Tootell RB, Dale AM (1999b) High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface. Hum Brain Mapp 8:272-284.
20. Fischl B, Liu A, Dale AM (2001): Automated manifold surgery: Constructing geometrically accurate and topologically correct models of the human cerebral cortex. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20:70-80.
21. Fuchs M, Wagner M, Wischmann HA, Kohler T, Theissen A, Drenckhahn R, Buchner H (1998): Improving source reconstructions by combining bioelectric and biomagnetic data. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 107:93-111.
22. Fuchs M, Wagner M, Kastner J (2001): Boundary element method volume conductor models for EEG source reconstruction. Clin Neurophysiol 112:1400-1407.
23. Goncalves S, de Munck JC, Heethaar RM, Lopes da Silva FH, van Dijk BW (2000): The application of electrical impedance tomography to reduce systematic errors in the EEG inverse problema simulation study. Physiol Meas 21:379-393.
24. Grieve PG, Emerson RG, Isler JR, Stark RI (2004): Quantitative analysis of spatial sampling error in the infant and adult electroencephalogram. Neuroimage 21:1260-1274.
25. Hämäläinen MS, Sarvas J (1989): Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 36:165-171.
26. Hämäläinen MS, Hari R, Ilmoniemi RJ, Knuutila J, Lounasmaa O (1993): Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev Modern Phys 65:1-93.
27. Hillebrand A, Barnes GR (2002): A quantitative assessment of the sensitivity of whole-head MEG to activity in the adult human cortex. Neuroimage 16:638-650.
28. Iwasaki M, Pestana E, Burgess RC, Luders HO, Shamoto H, Nakasato N (2005): Detection of epileptiform activity by human interpreters: Blinded comparison between electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography. Epilepsia 46:59-68.
29. Knake S, Halgren E, Shiraishi H, Hara K, Hamer HM, Grant PE, Carr VA, Foxe D, Camposano S, Busa E, Witzel T, Hämäläinen MS, Ahlfors SP, Bromfield EB, Black PM, Bourgeois BF, Cole AJ, Cosgrove GR, Dworetzky BA, Madsen JR, Larsson PG, Schomer DL, Thiele EA, Dale AM, Rosen BR, Stufflebeam SM (2006): The value of multichannel MEG and EEG in the presurgical evaluation of 70 epilepsy patients. Epilepsy Res 69:80-86.
30. Lantz G, Grave de Peralta R, Spinelli L, Seeck M, Michel CM (2003): Epileptic source localization with high density EEG: How many electrodes are needed? Clin Neurophysiol 114:63-69.
31. Leahy RM, Mosher JC, Spencer ME, Huang MX, Lewine JD (1998): A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 107:159-173.
32. Leijten FS, Huiskamp GJ, Hilgersom I, Van Huffelen AC (2003): High-resolution source imaging in mesiotemporal lobe epilepsy: a comparison between MEG and simultaneous EEG. J Clin Neurophysiol 20:227-238.
33. Lesser RP (2004): MEG: Good enough. Clin Neurophysiol 115:995-997.
34. Lin YY, Shih YH, Hsieh JC, Yu HY, Yiu CH, Wong TT, Yeh TC, Kwan SY, Ho LT, Yen DJ, Wu ZA, Chang MS (2003): Magnetoencephalographic yield of interictal spikes in temporal lobe epilepsy. Comparison with scalp EEG recordings. Neuroimage 19:1115-1126.
35. Liu AK, Dale AM, Belliveau JW (2002): Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy. Hum Brain Mapp 16:47-62.
36. Lopes da Silva FH, Wieringa HJ, Peters MJ (1991): Source localization of EEG versus MEG: Empirical comparison using visually evoked responses and theoretical considerations. Brain Topogr 4:133-142.
37. Lu ZL, Williamson SJ (1991): Spatial extent of coherent sensoryevoked cortical activity. Exp Brain Res 84:411-416.
38. Marinkovic K, Cox B, Reid K, Halgren E (2004): Head position in the MEG helmet affects the sensitivity to anterior sources. Neurol Clin Neurophysiol 30:30.
39. Melcher JR, Cohen D (1988): Dependence of the MEG on dipole orientation in the rabbit head. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 70:460-472.
40. Nunez PL (1990): Localization of brain activity with electroencephalography. In: Sato S, editor. Advances in Neurology, Vol. 54. Magnetoencephalography. New York: Raven Press. pp 39-65.
41. Okada Y, Lahteenmaki A, Xu C (1999b) Comparison of MEG and EEG on the basis of somatic evoked responses elicited by stimulation of the snout in the juvenile swine. Clin Neurophysiol 110:214-229.
42. Ossenblok P, Fuchs M, Velis DN, Veltman E, Pijn JP, da Silva FH (1999): Source analysis of lesional frontal-lobe epilepsy. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 18:67-77.
43. Pataraia E, Baumgartner C, Lindinger G, Deecke L (2002): Magnetoencephalography in presurgical epilepsy evaluation. Neurosurg Rev 25:141-159; discussion 160-161.
44. Pataraia E, Lindinger G, Deecke L, Mayer D, Baumgartner C (2005): Combined MEG/EEG analysis of the interictal spike complex in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuroimage 24:607-614.
45. Segonne F, Dale AM, Busa E, Glessner M, Salat D, Hahn HK, Fischl B (2004): A hybrid approach to the skull stripping problem in MRI. Neuroimage 22:1060-1075.
46. Shigeto H, Morioka T, Hisada K, Nishio S, Ishibashi H, Kira D, Tobimatsu S, Kato M (2002): Feasibility and limitations of magnetoencephalographic detection of epileptic discharges: Simultaneous recording of magnetic fields and electrocorticography. Neurol Res 24:531-536.
47. Stefan H, Hummel C, Scheler G, Genow A, Druschky K, Tilz C, Kaltenhauser M, Hopfengartner R, Buchfelder M, Romstock J (2003): Magnetic brain source imaging of focal epileptic activity: a synopsis of 455 cases. Brain 126:2396-2405.
48. Tarkiainen A, Liljeström M, Seppä M, Salmelin R (2003): The 3D topography of MEG source localization accuracy: Effects of conductor model and noise. Clin Neurophysiol 114:1977-1992.
49. Tesche CD, Uusitalo MA, Ilmoniemi RJ, Huotilainen M, Kajola M, Salonen O (1995): Signal-space projections of MEG data characterize both distributed and well-localized neuronal sources. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 95:189-200.
50. Wiebe S, Blume WT, Girvin JP, Eliasziw M (2001): A randomized, controlled trial of surgery for temporal-lobe epilepsy. N Engl J Med 345:311-318.
51. Wood CC, Cohen D, Cuffin BN, Yarita M, Allison T (1985): Electrical sources in human somatosensory cortex: Identification by combined magnetic and potential recordings. Science 227:1051-1053.
52. Yoshinaga H, Nakahori T, Ohtsuka Y, Oka E, Kitamura Y, Kiriyama H, Kinugasa K, Miyamoto K, Hoshida T (2002): Benefit of simultaneous recording of EEG and MEG in dipole localization. Epilepsia 43:924-928.
53. Zijlmans M, Huiskamp GM, Leijten FS, Van Der Meij WM, Wieneke G, Van Huffelen AC (2002): Modality-specific spike identification in simultaneous magnetoencephalography/electroencephalography: A methodological approach. J Clin Neurophysiol 19:183-191.