Prediction of short linear protein binding regions

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 415, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 193-204

  Mooney, Catherine ^a   Pollastri, Gianluca ^a   Shields, Denis C ^a   Haslam, Niall J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

intrinsically unstructured proteins; linear motif; molecular recognition; peptide binding; protein protein interface

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; BIOCHEMISTRY; BIOPHYSICS; MACHINE LEARNING; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SHORT LINEAR MOTIF PREDICTOR; SHORT LINEAR PROTEIN BINDING REGION;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 84855278383     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: 10898638     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.10.025     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Dyson, H. & Wright, P. (2005). Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 197-208. (Pubitemid 40314921)
2. Fuxreiter, M., Tompa, P. & Simon, I. (2007). Local structural disorder imparts plasticity on linear motifs. Bioinformatics, 23, 950.
3. Davey, N., Edwards, R. & Shields, D. (2010). Computational identification and analysis of protein short linear motifs. Front. Biosci. 15, 801-825.
4. Rajasekaran, S., Balla, S., Gradie, P., Gryk, M. R. R., Kadaveru, K., Kundeti, V. et al. (2008).Minimotif miner 2nd release: a database andweb systemformotif search. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D185-D190; (Database Issue).
5. Gould, C. M., Diella, F., Via, A., Puntervoll, P. L., Gemünd, C., Chabanis-Davidson, S. et al. (2010). ELM: the status of the 2010 Eukaryotic Linear Motif resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, D167-D180; (Database Issue).
6. Ngoei, K., Catimel, B., Church, N., Lio, D., Dogovski, C., Perugini, M. et al. (2011). Characterization of a novel JNK (c-Jun N-terminal kinase) inhibitory peptide. Biochem. J. 434, 399-413.
7. Gnad, F., Gunawardena, J. & Mann, M. (2010). PHOSIDA 2011: the posttranslational modification database. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D253-D260; (Database Issue).
8. Dinkel, H., Chica, C., Via, A., Gould, C. M., Jensen, L. J., Gibson, T. J. & Diella, F. (2010). Phospho.ELM: a database of phosphorylation sites - update 2011. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D261-D267; (Database Issue).
9. Miller, M. L., Jensen, L. J., Diella, F., Jorgensen, C., Tinti, M., Li, L. et al. (2008). Linear motif atlas for phosphorylation-dependent signaling. Sci. Signaling, 1, ra2.
10. Neduva, V. & Russell, R. B. (2006). DILIMOT: discovery of linear motifs in proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, W350-W355; (Web Server Issue).
11. Gutman, R., Berezin, C., Wollman, R., Rosenberg, Y. &Ben-Tal, N. (2005). QuasiMotiFinder: protein annotation by searching for evolutionarily conserved motiflike patterns. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W255-W261. (Pubitemid 44529920)
12. Chica, C., Diella, F. & Gibson, T. J. (2009). Evidence for the concerted evolution between short linear protein motifs and their flanking regions. PLoS ONE, 4, e6052.
13. Davey, N. E., Shields, D. C. & Edwards, R. J. (2009). Masking residues using context-specific evolutionary conservation significantly improves short linear motif discovery. Bioinformatics, 25, 443-450.
14. Ren, S., Uversky, V. N., Chen, Z., Dunker, K. K. &Obradovic, Z. (2008). Short linear motifs recognized by SH2, SH3 and Ser/Thr kinase domains are conserved in disordered protein regions. BMC Genomics, 9, S26.
15. Bailey, T. L., Boden, M., Buske, F. A., Frith, M., Grant, C. E., Clementi, L. et al. (2009). MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, W202-W208; (Web Server Issue).
16. Dogruel, M., Down, T. A. & Hubbard, T. J. (2008). NestedMICA as an ab initio protein motif discovery tool. BMC Bioinf. 9, 19.
17. Davey, N. E., Haslam, N. J., Shields, D. C. & Edwards, R. J. (2011). SLiMSearch 2.0 biological context for short linear motifs in proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, W56-W60; (Web Server Issue).
18. Kesmir, C., Nussbaum, A. K., Schild, H., Detours, V. &Brunak, S. (2002). Prediction of proteasome cleavage motifs by neural networks. Protein Eng. 15, 287-296. (Pubitemid 34532767)
19. Malik, R., Dulla, K., Nigg, E. A. & Koerner, R. (2010). From proteome lists to biological impact - tools and strategies for the analysis of large MS data sets. Proteomics, 10, 1270-1283.
20. Via, A., Gould, C. M., Gemünd, C., Gibson, T. J. &Helmer-Citterich, M. (2009). A structure filter for the Eukaryotic Linear Motif resource. BMC Bioinf. 10, 351.
21. Dosztányi, Z., Csizmok, V., Tompa, P. & Simon, I. (2005). IUPred: web server for the prediction of intrinsically unstructured regions of proteins based on estimated energy content. Bioinformatics, 21, 3433-3434. (Pubitemid 41222453)
22. Xue, B., Dunbrack, R. L., Williams, R. W., Dunker, A. K. & Uversky, V. N. (2010). PONDR-FIT: a meta-predictor of intrinsically disordered amino acids. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1804, 996-1010.
23. Ward, J. J., McGuffin, L. J., Bryson, K., Buxton, B. F. &Jones, D. T. (2004). The DISOPRED server for the prediction of protein disorder. Bioinformatics, 20, 2138-2139. (Pubitemid 39236567)
24. Diella, F., Chabanis, S., Luck, K., Chica, C., Ramu, C., Nerlov, C. & Gibson, T. J. (2009). KEPE - a motif frequently superimposed on SUMOylation sites in metazoan chromatin proteins and transcription factors. Bioinformatics, 25, 1-5.
25. Garner, E., Romero, P., Dunker, A., Brown, C. &Obradovic, Z. (1999). Predicting binding regions within disordered proteins. Genome Inf. Ser. 10, 41-50.
26. Mészáros, B., Simon, I. & Dosztányi, Z. (2009). Prediction of protein binding regions in disordered proteins. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000376.
27. Mohan, A., Oldfield, C., Radivojac, P., Vacic, V., Cortese, M., Dunker, A. & Uversky, V. (2006). Analysis of molecular recognition features (MoRFs). J. Mol. Biol. 362, 1043-1059. (Pubitemid 44353519)
28. Vacic, V., Oldfield, C., Mohan, A., Radivojac, P., Cortese, M., Uversky, V. & Dunker, A. (2007). Characterization of molecular recognition features, MoRFs, and their binding partners. J. Proteome Res. 6, 2351-2366. (Pubitemid 46985123)
29. Meszaros, B., Simon, I. & Dosztanyi, Z. (2009). Prediction of protein binding regions in disordered proteins. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000376.
30. Dosztányi, Z., Mészáros, B. & Simon, I. (2009). ANCHOR: web server for predicting protein binding regions in disordered proteins. Bioinformatics, 25, 2745-2746.
31. Oldfield, C., Cheng, Y., Cortese, M., Romero, P., Uversky, V. & Dunker, A. (2005). Coupled folding and binding with α-helix-forming molecular recognition elements. Biochemistry, 44, 12454-12470. (Pubitemid 41324337)
32. Cheng, Y., Oldfield, C., Meng, J., Romero, P., Uversky, V. & Dunker, A. (2007). Mining α-helix-forming molecular recognition features with cross species sequence alignments. Biochemistry, 46, 13468-13477. (Pubitemid 350209945)
33. Dunker, A. K., Oldfield, C. J., Meng, J., Romero, P., Yang, J. Y., Chen, J. W. et al. (2008). The unfoldomics decade: an update on intrinsically disordered proteins. BMC Genomics, 9, S1.
34. Oldfield, C., Meng, J., Yang, J., Yang, M., Uversky, V. & Dunker, A. (2008). Flexible nets: disorder and induced fit in the associations of p53 and 14-3-3 with their partners. BMC Genomics, 9, S1.
35. Owen, D., Vallis, Y., Pearse, B., McMahon, H. &Evans, P. (2000). The structure and function of the β2-adaptin appendage domain. EMBO J. 19, 4216-4227. (Pubitemid 30623732)
36. Pollastri, G. & McLysaght, A. (2005). Porter: a new, accurate server for protein secondary structure prediction. Bioinformatics, 21, 1719-1720. (Pubitemid 40542742)
37. UniProt Consortium. (2010). The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) in 2010. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, D142-D148; (Database Issue).
38. Edwards, R. J., Davey, N. E. & Shields, D. C. (2008). CompariMotif: quick and easy comparisons of sequence motifs. Bioinformatics, 24, 1307-1309. (Pubitemid 351659630)
39. Letunic, I., Doerks, T. & Bork, P. (2009). SMART 6: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D229-D232; (Database Issue).
40. Pollastri, G., Martin, A. J. M., Mooney, C. & Vullo, A. (2007). Accurate prediction of protein secondary structure and solvent accessibility by consensus combiners of sequence and structure information. BMC Bioinf. 8, 201.
41. Mooney, C., Vullo, A. & Pollastri, G. (2006). Protein structural motif prediction in multidimensional ø-ψ space leads to improved secondary structure prediction. J. Comput. Biol. 13, 1489-1502.
42. Stein, A. & Aloy, P. (2010). Novel peptide-mediated interactions derived from high-resolution 3-dimensional structures. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6, e1000789.
43. Berman, H., Battistuz, T., Bhat, T., Bluhm, W., Bourne, P., Burkhardt, K. et al. (2002). The Protein Data Bank. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 58, 899-907. (Pubitemid 34653017)
44. Baldi, P., Brunak, S., Frasconi, P., Soda, G. & Pollastri, G. (1999). Exploiting the past and the future in protein secondary structure prediction. Bioinformatics, 15, 937.
45. Baú, D., Martin, A. J. M., Mooney, C., Vullo, A., Walsh, I. & Pollastri, G. (2006). Distill: a suite of web servers for the prediction of one-, two- and three-dimensional structural features of proteins. BMC Bioinf. 7, 402.
46. Dosztányi, Z., Csizmók, V., Tompa, P. & Simon, I. (2005). The pairwise energy content estimated from amino acid composition discriminates between folded and intrinsically unstructured proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 347, 827-839. (Pubitemid 40357923)