The time course of visual field recovery and changes of retinal ganglion cells after optic chiasmal decompression

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 52, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 7966-7973

  Moon, Chan Hee ^a   Hwang, Sun Chul ^a   Ohn, Young Hoon ^a   Park, Tae Kwann ^a  

^a Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; B WAVE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NERVE DECOMPRESSION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPTIC CHIASM; OPTIC NERVE; PERIMETRY; PHOTOPIC VISION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RETINA GANGLION CELL; RETINAL NERVE FIBER LAYER THICKNESS; SPECTRAL DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; TUMOR VOLUME; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; ADENOMA; CONVALESCENCE; CRANIOPHARYNGIOMA; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; HYPOPHYSIS TUMOR; MENINGIOMA; METABOLISM; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBER; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME;

ADENOMA; CRANIOPHARYNGIOMA; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MENINGIOMA; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBERS; OPTIC CHIASM; PITUITARY NEOPLASMS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 84555187224     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-7450     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Cushing H, Walker CB. Distortion of the visual fields in cases of brain tumor. IV. Chiasmal lesions with special reference to bitemporal hemianopsia. Brain. 1915;37:341-400.
2. Laws ER Jr, Trautmann JC, Hollenhorst RW Jr. Transsphenoidal decompression of the optic nerve and chiasm: visual results in 62 patients. J Neurosurg. 1977;46:717-722.
3. Gnanalingham KK, Bhattacharjee S, Pennington R, Ng J, Mendoza N. The time course of visual field recovery following transphenoidal surgery for course of visual field recovery following transphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas: predictive factors for a good outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76:415-419.
4. Kerrison JB, Lynn MJ, Baer CA, Newman SA, Biousse V, Newman NJ. Stages of improvement in visual fields after pituitary tumor resection. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130:813-820.
5. Li B, Barnes GE, Holt WF. The decline of the photopic negative response (PhNR) in the rat after optic nerve transaction. Doc Ophthalmol. 2005;111:23-31.
6. Berkelaar M, Clarke DB, Wang Y-C, Bray GM, Aguayo AJ. Axotomy results in delayed death and apoptosis of retinal ganglion cells in adult rats. J Neurosci. 1994;14:4368-4374.
7. Chacko AG, Babu KS, Chandy MJ. Value of visual evoked potential monitoring during trans-sphenoidal surgery. Br J Neurosurg. 1996; 10:275-278.
8. Brecelj J, Denislic M, Skrbec M. Visual evoked potential abnormalities in chiasmal lesions. Doc Ophthalmol. 1989;73:139-148.
9. Parmar DN, Sofat A, Bowman R, Bartlett JR, Holder GE. Visual prognostic value of the pattern electroretinogram in chiasmal compression. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:1024-1026.
10. Monteiro ML, Cunha LP, Costa-Cunha LV, Maia OO Jr, Oyamada MK. Relationship between optical coherence tomography, pattern electroretinogram, and automated perimetry in eyes with temporal hemianopia from chiasmal compression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:3535-3541.
11. Machida S, Toba Y, Ohtaki A, Gotoh Y, Kaneko M, Kurosaka D. Photopic negative response of focal electroretinograms in glaucomatous eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:5636-5644.
12. Machida S, Raz-Prag D, Fariss RN, Sieving PA, Bush RA. Photopic ERG negative response from amarcine cell signaling in RCS rat retinal degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:442-452.
13. Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ, Robson JG, Walters JW. The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:514-522.
14. Rangaswamy NV, Frishman LJ, Dorotheo EU, et al. Photopic ERGs in patients with optic neuropathies: comparison with primate ERGs after pharmacological blockade of inner retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:3827-3837.
15. Moura FC, Medeiros FA, Monteiro ML. Evaluation of macular thickness measurements for detection of band atrophy of the optic nerve using optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:175-181.
16. Kanmori A, Nakamura M, Matsui N, et al. Optical coherence tomography detects characteristic retinal nerve fiber layer thickness corresponding to band atrophy of the optic discs. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:2278-2283.
17. Monteiro ML, Moura FC, Medeiros FA. Diagnostic ability of optical coherence tomography with a normative database to detect band atrophy of the optic nerve. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:896-899.
18. Danesh-Meyer HV, Carroll SC, Foroozan R, et al. Relationship between retinal nerve fiber layer and visual field sensitivity as measured by optical coherence tomography in chiasmal compression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:4827-4835.
19. Jacob M, Raverot G, Jouanneau E, et al. Predicting visual outcome after treatment of pituitary adenoma with optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147:64-70.
20. Danesh-Meyer HV, Papchenko T, Savino PJ, et al. In vivo retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography predicts visual recovery after surgery for parachiasmal tumors. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:1879-1885.
21. Johansson C, Lindblom B. The role of optical coherence tomography in the detection of pituitary adenoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 2009;87:776-779.
22. Garway-Heath DF, Caprioli J, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Scaling the hill of vision: the physiological relationship between light sensitivity and ganglion cell numbers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000; 41:1774-1782.
23. Garway-Heath DF, Holder GE, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Relationship between electrophysiological, psychophysical, and anatomical measurements in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002; 43:2213-2220.
24. Schlottmann PG, De Cilla S, Greenfield DS, Caprioli J, Garway-Heath DF. Relationship between visual field sensitivity and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness as measured by scanning laser polarimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:1823-1829.
25. Narahashi T. Chemicals as tools in the study of excitable membranes. Physiol Rev. 1974;54:813-889.
26. Bloomfield SA. Effect of spike blockade on the receptive-field size of amacrine and ganglion cells in the rabbit retina, J Neurophysiol. 1996;75:1878-1893.
27. Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ, Robson JG, Harwerth RS, Smith EL 3rd. The photopic negative response of the macaque electroretinogram: reduction by experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:1124-1136.
28. Machida S, Gotoh Y, Toba Y, Ohtaki A, Kaneko M, Kurosaka D. Correlation between photopic negative response and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disc photography in glaucomatous eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:2201-2207.
29. Machida S, Gotoh Y, Tanaka M, Tazawa Y. Predominant loss of the photopic negative response in central retinal artery occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:938-940.
30. Gotoh Y, Machida S, Tazawa Y. Selective loss of the photopic negative response in patients with optic nerve atrophy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:341-346.
31. Grafstein B, Ingoglia NA. Intracranial transaction of the optic nerve in adult mice: preliminary observation. Exp Neurol. 1982;76:318-330.
32. Allcutt D, Berry M, Sievers J. A quantitative comparison of the reactions of retinal ganglion cells to optic nerve crush in neonatal and adult mice. Brain Res. 1984;318:219-230.
33. Barron KD, Dentinger G, Krohel G, Easton SK, Mankes R. Qualitative and quantitative ultrastructural observation on retinal ganglion cell layer of rat after intraorbital optic nerve crush. J Neurocytol. 1986;15:345-362.
34. Donoff RB. Nerve regeneration: basic and applied aspects. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1995;6:18-24.
35. Unsöld R, Hoyt WF. Band atrophy of the optic nerve. The histology of temporal hemianopsia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;98:1637-1638.