Generalized mixture models for molecular phylogenetic estimation

Systematic Biology

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 12-21

  Evans, Jason ^a   Sullivan, Jack ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian phylogenetic inference; mixture models; model selection; polytomous trees; reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL NUCLEUS; CLASSIFICATION; EVALUATION; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; MAMMAL; METHODOLOGY; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PHYLOGENY; PROBABILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CELL NUCLEUS; CLASSIFICATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MAMMALS; MARKOV CHAINS; MODELS, GENETIC; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PHYLOGENY;

MAMMALIA;

EID: 84555186850     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syr093     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Altekar G., Dwarkadas S., Huelsenbeck J.P., Ronquist F. 2004. Parallel Metropolis coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo for Bayesian phy-logentic inference. Bioinformatics. 20:407-415. (Pubitemid 38262773)
2. Brooks S.P., Gelman A. 1998. General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 7:434-455.
3. Cummings M.P., Handley S.A., Myers D.S., Reed D.L., Rokas A., Winka K. 2003. Comparing bootstrap and posterior probability values in the four-taxon case. Syst. Biol. 52:477-487. (Pubitemid 36990376)
4. Evans J. 2009. Crux software toolkit for phylogenetic inference, version 1.2. Available from: http://www.canonware.com/Crux/.
5. Frajman B., Eggens F., Oxelman G. 2009. Hybrid origins and homoploid reticulate evolution within Heliosperma (Sileneae, Caryophyllaceae)-a multigene phylogenetic approach with relative dating. Syst. Biol. 58:328-345.
6. Green P.J. 1995. Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination. Biometrika. 82:711-732.
7. Green P.J. 2003. Trans-dimensional Markov chain Monte Carlo. In: Green P.J., Hjort N.L., Richardson S., editors. Highly structured stochastic systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 179-198.
8. Hastings W.K. 1970. Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika. 57:97-109.
9. Huelsenbeck J.P., Larget B., Alfaro M.E. 2004. Bayesian phylogenetic model selection using reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1123-1133. (Pubitemid 38658220)
10. Huelsenbeck J.P., Suchard M.A. 2007. A nonparametric method for accomodating and testing across-site rate variation. Syst. Biol. 56:1-13.
11. Kjer K.M., Honeycutt R.L. 2007. Site specifc rates of mitochondrial genomes and the phylogeny of eutheria. BMC Evol. Biol. 7. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/7/8.
12. Lakner C., van der Mark P., Huelsenbeck J.P., Larget B., Ronquist F. 2008. Effciency of Markov chain Monte Carlo tree proposals in Bayesian phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 57:86-103.
13. Lartillot N., Philippe H. 2004. A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1095-1099.
14. Lewis P.O., Holder M.T., Holsinger K.E. 2005. Polytomies and Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Syst. Biol. 54:241-253. (Pubitemid 40707806)
15. Maddison D.R., Swofford D.L., Maddison W.P. 1997. Nexus: an extensible fle format for systematic information. Syst. Biol. 46: 590-621.
16. Metropolis N., Rosenbluth A.W., Rosenbluth M.N., Teller A.H., Teller E. 1953. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 21:1087-1092.
17. Mossel E., Vigoda E. 2005. Phylogenetic MCMC algorithms are misleading on mixtures of trees. Science. 309:2207-2209. (Pubitemid 41396068)
18. Murphy W.J., Eizirik E., O'Brien S.J., Madsen O., Scally M., Douady C.J., Teeling E., Ryder O.A., Stanhope M.J., de Jong W.W., Springer M.S. 2001. Resolution of the early placental mammal radiation using Bayesian phylogenetics. Science. 294:2348-2351. (Pubitemid 33140557)
19. Pagel M., Meade A. 2004. A phylogenetic mixture model for detecting pattern-heterogeneity in gene sequence or character-state data. Syst. Biol. 53:571-581. (Pubitemid 39290200)
20. Pagel M., Meade A. 2005. Mixture models in phylogenetic inference. In: Gascuel O., editor. Mathematics of evolution and phylogeny. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 121-139.
21. Pearson W.R., Lipman D.J. 1988. Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85:2444-2448.
22. Prasad A.B., Allard M.W., Green E.D. 2008. Confrming the phylogeny of mammals by use of large comparative sequence data sets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25:1795-1808.
23. Rokas A., Williams B.L., King N., Carroll S.B. 2003. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incrongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature. 425:798-804. (Pubitemid 37355944)
24. Sullivan J., Swofford D. 1997. Are guinea pigs rodents? The importance of adequate models in molecular phylogenetics. J. Mamm. Evol. 4:77-86. (Pubitemid 127125190)
25. Suzuki Y., Glazko G.V., Nei M. 2002. Overcredibility of molecular phy-logenies obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99:16138-16143. (Pubitemid 35462762)
26. Venditti C., Meade A., Pagel M. 2008. Phylogenetic mixture models can reduce node-density artifacts. Syst. Biol. 57:286-293.
27. Yang Z. 1994a. Estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 39:105-111. (Pubitemid 24181131)
28. Yang Z. 1994b. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J. Mol. Evol. 39:306-314. (Pubitemid 24283346)