Comparative evaluation of range sensing technologies for underground void modeling

IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 3816-3823

  Wong, Uland ^a   Morris, Aaron ^b   Lea, Colin ^c   Lee, James ^a   Whittaker, Chuck ^a   Garney, Ben ^d   Whittaker, Red ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AllPoint Systems LLC   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^d Push Button Labs LLC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; IN-SITU; RANGE SENSING; RANGE SENSORS; SURFACE APPLICATIONS; TUNNEL ENVIRONMENTS; UNDERGROUND TUNNELS; UNDERGROUND VOIDS;

INTELLIGENT ROBOTS; ROBOTICS;

SENSORS;

EID: 84455173323     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IROS.2011.6048626     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Omohundro, Z. Robot Configuration for Subterranean Modeling. PhD Dissertation. Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 2007.
2. Desai, A., Huber, D. Objective Evaluation of Scanning Ladar Configurations for Mobile Robots. In Proc. 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2009.
3. Morris, A., Ferguson, D., Omohundro, Z., et al. Recent Developments in Subterranean Robotics. Journal of Field Robotics, 2006.
4. Wong, U., Garney, G., Whittaker, W., Whittaker, R. Camera and LIDAR Fusion for Mapping of Actively Illuminated Subterranean Voids. In Proc. of International Confe-rence on Field and Service Robotics, 2009.
5. Okubo, Y., Ye, C., Borenstein, J. Characterization of the Hokuro URG-04LX Laser Rangefinder for Mobile Robot Obstacle Negotiation. SPIE Defense, Security + Sensing, Unmanned Systems Technology Conference, 2009.
6. Ye, C., Borenstein, J. Characterization of a 2-D Laser Scanner for Mobile Robot Ob-stacle Negotiation. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2002.
7. Kneip, L., Tache, F., Caprari, G., Siegwart, R. Characterization of the compact Hokuro URG-04LX 2d laser range scanner. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2009.
8. Anderson, D., Herman, H., Kelly, A. Experimental Characterization of Commercial Flash Ladar Devices. International Conference of Sensing and Technology, 2005.
9. Chiabrando, F., Chiabrando, R., Piatti, D., Rinaudo, R. Sensors for 3D Imaging: Metric Evaluation and Calibration of a CCD/CMOS Timeof- Flight Camera. Sensors, 9(12):10080-10096, 2009.
10. Anchini, R., Loguori, C., Paciello, V., Paolillo A. A Comparison Between Stereo-Vision Techniques for the Reconstruction of 3-D Coordinates of Objects. IEEE Trans-actions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 55, No. 5, 2006.
11. Seitz, S., Curless, B., Diebel, J., Scharstein, D., Szeliski, R. A Comparison and Evalu-ation of Multi-View Stereo Reconstruction Algorithms. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2006.
12. Fischer, J., Menon, A., Gorjestani, A., Shankwitz, C., Donath, M. Range Sensor Eval-uation for Use in Cooperate Intersection Collision Avoidance Systems. In IEEE Proc. Vehicular Networking Conference, 2009.
13. Radosevic, G. Laser Scanning Versus Photogrammetry Combined with Manual Post-modeling in Stecak Digitization. In Proc. 14th Central European Seminar on Computer Graphics, 2010.
14. Matthies, L., Grandjean, P. Stochastic Performance Modeling and Evaluation of Ob-stacle Detectability with Imaging Range Sensors. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 10, 1994.
15. Blais, F. Review of 20 Years of Range Sensor Development. Journal of Electronic Im-aging, 13(1): 231-240, January 2004.
16. Geiger, A., Roser, M., Urtasun, R. Efficient Large-Scale Stereo Matching. In Proc. Asian Conference on Computer Vision, 2010.