Effect of screen size on multimedia vocabulary learning

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 62-70

  Kim, Daesang ^a   Kim, Dong Joong ^b  

^a Saint Mary of the Woods College   (United States)

^b Korea National University of Education   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LARGE SCREEN; MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS; MULTIMEDIA INSTRUCTION; RANDOMLY DISTRIBUTED; SCREEN SIZES; SMALL SCREENS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VOCABULARY LEARNING;

EDUCATION;

SCREEN PRINTING;

EID: 84255188438     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01145.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Acha, J., (2009). The effectiveness of multimedia programmes in children's vocabulary learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 23-31.
2. Cavus, N., &, Ibrahim, D., (2009). M-Learning: an experiment in using SMS to support learning new English language words. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 78-91.
3. Chanlin, L., (1997). The effects of verbal elaboration and visual elaboration on student learning. International Journal of Instructional Media, 24, 4, 333-339.
4. Chen, N., Hsieh, S., &, Kinshuk,. (2008). Effects of short-term memory and content representation type on mobile language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 12, 93-113.
5. Chen, L., Xie, X., Fan, X., Ma, W., Zhang, H., &, Zhou, H., (2003). A visual attention model for adapting images on small displays. ACM Multimedia Systems Journal, 9, 353-364.
6. Eysenck, M. W., (2001). Principles of cognitive psychology. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
7. Hearther, N. K., (2008). The ebook reader is not the future of ebooks. Searcher, 16, 26-40.
8. Kim, D., &, Gilman, D. A., (2008). Effects of text, audio, and graphic aids in multimedia instruction for vocabulary learning. Educational Technology & Society, 11, 114-126.
9. Larson, L., (2008). Electronic reading workshop: beyond books with new literacies and instructional technologies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52, 121-131 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ817073).
10. Lu, M., (2008). Effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phone. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 515-525.
11. Maniar, N., Bennett, E., Hand, S., &, Allan, G., (2008). The effect of mobile phone screen size on video based learning. Journal of Software, 3, 51-61.
12. Mayer, R. E., (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Mayer, R., &, Moreno, R., (2002). Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 12, 107-119. (Pubitemid 39659598)
14. Miller, G. A., (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
15. Motiwalla, L. F., (2007). Mobile learning: a framework and evaluation. Computers & Education, 49, 581-596. (Pubitemid 46777150)
16. Newby, J., Stepich, A., Lehman, D., &, Russell, D., (1996). Instructional technology for teaching and learning: designing instruction, integrating computers, and using media. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
17. Paivio, A., (1986). Mental representations: a dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Reeves, B., Lang, A., Kim, E. Y., &, Tatar, D., (1999). The effects of screen size and message content on attention and arousal. Media Psychology, 1, 49-68.
19. Rogoff, B., (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Sadoski, M., &, Paivio, A., (2001). Imagery and text: a dual coding theory of reading and writing. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Schnotz, W., (2001). Signs systems, technologies and the acquisition of knowledge. In, J. F. Rouet, J. J. Levonen, &, A. Biardeau, (Eds), Multimedia learning: cognitive and instructional issues (pp. 9-30). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
22. Schnotz, W., (2005). An integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In, R. E. Mayer, (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 49-69). New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Schnotz, W., &, Kürschner, C., (2007). A reconsideration of cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology Review. 19, 469-508.
24. Schnotz, W., &, Kürschner, C., (2008). External and internal representations in the acquisition and use of knowledge: visualization effects on mental model construction. Instructional Science, 36, 3, 175-190.
25. Schnotz, W., Bannert, W., &, Seufert, T., (2002). Towards an integrative view of text and picture comprehension: visualization effects on the construction of mental models. In, A. Graessser, J. Otero, &, J. A. Leon, (Eds), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 385-416). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Sorden, S., (2005). A cognitive approach to instructional design for multimedia learning. Information Science Journal, 8, 263-279. (Pubitemid 41664102)
27. Stiller, K., Freitag, A., Zinnbauer, P., &, Freitag, C., (2009). How pacing of multimedia instructions can influence modality effects: a case of superiority of visual texts. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25, 184-203.
28. Stockwell, G., (2007). Vocabulary on the move: investigating an intelligent mobile phone-based vocabulary tutor. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20, 365-383.
29. Stokes, S., (2002). Visual literacy in teaching and learning: a literature perspective. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 1, 1, 10-19. Retrieved July 10, 2010, from.
30. Sweller, J., &, Chandler, P., (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 185-233.
31. Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J., &, Paas, F., (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251-296.
32. Tabbers, K. H., Martens, L. R., &, Merrienboer, J. J., (2004). Multimedia instructions and cognitive load theory: effects of modality and cueing. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 71-82.
33. Vygotsky, L. S., (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.