SUP35 expression is enhanced in yeast containing [ISP+], a prion form of the transcriptional regulator Sfp1

Prion

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 317-322

  Radchenko, Elina ^a   Rogoza, Tatyana ^a   Khokhrina, Maria ^a   Drozdova, Polina ^a   Mironova, Ludmila ^a  

^a ST PETERSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Nonsense suppression; Regulation of gene expression; SFP1; SUP35; Yeast prion

Indexed keywords

SFP1 PROTEIN; SUP35 PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; MUTATION; NONHUMAN; PRION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; YEAST; YEAST CELL;

DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; GENE DELETION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; PEPTIDE TERMINATION FACTORS; PLASMIDS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 83755195313     PISSN: 19336896     EISSN: 1933690X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/pri.5.4.18426     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. +] in yeast is a nuclear-residing prion form of the global transcriptional regulator Sfp1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107:10573-7; PMID:20498075; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.1005949107.
2. Volkov KV, Aksenova AYu, Soom MJ, Osipov KV, Svitin AV, Kurischko C, et al. Novel non-Mendelian determinant involved in the control of translation accuracy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2002; 160:25-36; PMID:11805042.
3. Grimminger V, Richter K, Imhof A, Buchner J, Walter S. The prion curing agent guanidinium chloride specifically inhibits ATP hydrolysis by Hsp104. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:7378-83; PMID:14668331; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M312403200.
4. Romanova NV, Chernoff YO. Hsp104 and prion propagation. Protein Pept Lett 2009; 16:598-605; PMID:19519517; http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/092986609788490078.
5. Jones GW, Tuite MF. Chaperoning prions: the cellular machinery for propagating an infectious protein? Bioessays 2005; 27:823-32; PMID:16015602; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bies.20267.
6. Uptain SM, Lindquist S. Prions as protein-based genetic elements. Annu Rev Microbiol 2002; 56:703-41; PMID:12142498; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev. micro.56.013002.100603.
7. Wickner RB, Edskes HK, Ross ED, Pierce MM, Baxa U, Brachmann A, et al. Prion genetics: new rules for a new kind of gene. Annu Rev Genet 2004; 38:681-707; PMID:15355224; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.38.072902. 092200.
8. Wickner RB, Shewmaker F, Kryndushkin D, Edskes HK. Protein inheritance (prions) based on parallel in-register beta-sheet amyloid structures. Bioessays 2008; 30:955-64; PMID:18798523; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bies.20821.
9. Stansfield I, Jones KM, Kushnirov VV, Dagkesamanskaya AR, Poznyakovski AI, Paushkin SV, et al. The products of the SUP45 (eRF1) and SUP35 genes interact to mediate translation termination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 1995; 14:4365-73; PMID:7556078.
10. Zhouravleva G, Frolova L, Le Goff X, Le Guellec R, Inge-Vechtomov S, Kisselev L, et al. Termination of translation in eukaryotes is governed by two interacting polypeptide chain release factors, eRF1 and eRF3. EMBO J 1995; 14:4065-72; PMID:7664746.
11. Jorgensen P, Rupes I, Sharom JR, Schneper L, Broach JR, Tyers M. A dynamic transcriptional network communicates growth potential to ribosome synthesis and critical cell size. Genes Dev 2004; 18:2491-505; PMID:15466158; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1228804.
12. Marion RM, Regev A, Segal E, Barash Y, Koller D, Friedman N, et al. Sfp1 is a stress- and nutrientsensitive regulator of ribosomal protein gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:14315-22; PMID:15353587; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0405353101.
13. Fingerman I, Nagaraj V, Norris D, Vershon AK. Sfp1 plays a key role in yeast ribosome biogenesis. Eukaryot Cell 2003; 2:1061-8; PMID:14555489; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/EC.2.5.1061-8.2003.
14. Jorgensen P, Rupes I, Sharom JR, Schneper L, Broach JR, Tyers M. A dynamic transcriptional network communicates growth potential to ribosome synthesis and critical cell size. Genes Dev 2004; 18:2491-505; PMID:15466158; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1228804.
15. Cipollina C, van den Brink J, Daran-Lapujade P, Pronk JT, Porro D, de Winde JH. Saccharomyces cerevisiae SFP1: at the crossroads of central metabolism and ribosome biogenesis. Microbiology 2008; 154:1686-99; PMID:18524923; http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.2008/017392-0.
16. Loewith R, Jacinto E, Wullschleger S, Lorberg A, Crespo JL, Bonenfant D, et al. Two TOR complexes, only one of which is rapamycin sensitive, have distinct roles in cell growth control. Mol Cell 2002; 10:457-68; PMID:12408816; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00636-6.
17. Wullschleger S, Loewith R, Hall MN. TOR signaling in growth and metabolism. Cell 2006; 124:471-84; PMID:16469695; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cell.2006.01.016.
18. Paushkin SV, Kushnirov VV, Smirnov VN, Ter-Avanesyan MD. Interaction between yeast Sup45p (eRF1) and Sup35p (eRF3) polypeptide chain release factors: implications for prion-dependent regulation. Mol Cell Biol 1997; 17:2798-805; PMID:9111351.
19. Parsons AB, Brost RL, Ding H, Li Z, Zhang C, Sheikh B, et al. Integration of chemical-genetic and genetic interaction data links bioactive compounds to cellular target pathways. Nat Biotechnol 2004; 22:62-9; PMID:14661025; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt919.
20. Fan-Minogue H, Du M, Pisarev AV, Kallmeyer AK, Salas-Marco J, Keeling KM, et al. Distinct eRF3 Requirements Suggest Alternate eRF1 Conformations Mediate Peptide Release During Eukaryotic Translation Termination. Mol Cell 2008; 30:599-609; PMID:18538658; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.03.020.
21. Baxa U, Speransky V, Steven AC, Wickner RB. Mechanism of inactivation on prion conversion of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ure2 protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99:5253-60; PMID:11959975; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 082097899.
22. Bai M, Zhou JM, Perrett S. The yeast prion protein Ure2 shows glutathione peroxidase activity in both native and fibrillar forms. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:50025-30; PMID:15371425; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M406612200.
23. Gordân R, Hartemink AJ, Bulyk ML. Distinguishing direct versus indirect transcriptional factor-DNA interactions. Genome Res 2009; 19:2090-100; PMID:19652015; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.094144.109.
24. +]. Cell 2001; 106:171-82; PMID:11511345; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00427-5.
25. Wickner RB, Shewmaker F, Edskes H, Kryndushkin D, Nemecek J, McGlinchey R, et al. Prion amyloid structure explains templating: how proteins can be genes. FEMS Yeast Res 2010; 10:980-91; PMID:20726897; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ j.1567-364.2010.00666.x.
26. Lempiäinen H, Shore D. Growth control and ribosome biogenesis. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2009; 21:855-63; PMID:19796927; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb. 2009.09.002.
27. Kaiser C, Michaelis S, Mitchell A. Methods in Yeast Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview NY 1994; 234.
28. Gassmann M, Grenacher B, Rohde B, Vogel J. Quantifying western blots: pitfalls of densitometry. Electrophoresis 2009; 30:1845-55; PMID:19517440; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elps.200800720.
29. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc 2008; 3:1101-8; PMID:18546601; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/nprot.2008.73.