The role of developmental levels in examining the effect of subject types on the production of auxiliary is in young english-speaking children

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 54, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1658-1666

  Guo, Ling Yu ^a   Owen Van Horne, Amanda J ^b   Bruce Tomblin, J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Auxiliary is; Gradual morphosyntactic learning hypothesis; Subject types; Tense

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FACTUAL DATABASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LANGUAGE TEST; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPEECH; THEORETICAL MODEL;

CHILD LANGUAGE; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LANGUAGE TESTS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPEECH;

EID: 83755173134     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0140)     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Becker, M. (2004). Copula omission is a grammatical reflex. Language Acquisition, 12, 157-167.
2. Bedore, L., & Leonard, L. (1998). Specific language impairment and grammatical morphology: A discriminant function analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1185-1992.
3. Bock, J. K. (1982). Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review, 89, 1-47.
4. Bock, K., & Levelt, W. (1994). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In M. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 945-984). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
5. Bloom, P. (1990). Subjectless sentences in child language. Linguistic Inquiry, 21, 491-504.
6. Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. DeThorne, L., Johnson, B., & Loeb, D. F. (2005). A closer look at MLU: What does it really measure? Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 19, 635-648.
8. Eisenberg, S., Fersko, T., & Lundgren, C. (2001). The use of MLU for identifying language impairment in preschool children: A review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10, 323-342.
9. Gerken, L., & McIntosh, B. (1993). Interplay of function morphemes and prosody in early language. Developmental Psychology, 29, 448-457.
10. Goffman, L., & Leonard, J. (2000). Growth of language skills in preschool children with specific language impairment: Implication for assessment and intervention. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 9, 151-161.
11. Grela, B., & Leonard, L. (2000). The influence of argument-structure complexity on the use of auxiliary verbs by children with SLI. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 1115-1125.
12. Guo, L-Y., Owen, A. J., & Tomblin, J. B. (2010). Effect of subject types on the production of auxiliary is in young English-speaking children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 1720-1741.
13. Guo, L., Owen, A., & Tomblin, J. B. (2011). Effect of predicate types on the production of copula "is" in young English-speaking children. Manuscript submitted for publication.
14. Hadley, P., & Holt, J. (2006). Individual differences in the onset of tense marking: A growth-curve analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 984-1000.
15. Hadley, P., & Rice, M. (1996). Emergent uses of BE and DO: Evidence from children with specific language impairment. Language Acquisition, 5, 209-243.
16. Hadley, P., Rispoli, M., Fitzgerald, C, & Bahnsen, A. (2011). Predictors of morphosyntactic growth in typically developing toddlers: Contributions of parent input and child sex. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 549-566.
17. Hadley, P., & Short, H. (2005). The onset of tense marking in children at risk for specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 1344-1362.
18. Legate, J., & Yang, C. D. (2007). Morphosyntactic learning and the development of tense. Language Acquisition, 14, 315-344.
19. Leonard, L. (1995). Functional categories in the grammars of children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 1270-1283.
20. Leonard, L. B., Miller, C. A., & Gerber, E. (1999). Gram-matical morphology and the lexicon in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 678-689.
21. Leonard, L. B., Miller, C. A., Grela, B., Holland, A. L., Gerber, E., & Petucci, M. (2000). Production operations contribute to the grammatical limitations of children with specific language impairment. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 362-378.
22. Miller, J. F. (1981). Assessing language production in children: Experimental procedures. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
23. Miller, J., & Chapman, R. S. (2000). Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (Version 6.1) [Computer software]. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
24. Owen, A. (2010). Factors affecting accuracy of past tense production in children with specific language impairment and their typically developing peers: The influence of verb transitivity, clause location, and sentence type. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 993-1014.
25. Pine, J. M., Conti-Ramsden, G., Joseph, K. L., Lieven, E. V. M., & Serratrice, L. (2008). Tense over time: Testing the Agreement/Tense Omission Model as an account of the pattern of tense-marking provision in early child English. Journal of Child Language, 35, 55-75.
26. Redmond, S. (2004). Conversational profiles of children with ADHD, SLI, and typical development. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 18, 107-125.
27. Rice, M., Smolik, F., Perpich, D., Thompson, T., Rytting, N., & Blossom, M. (2010). Mean length of utterance levels in 6-month intervals for children 3 to 9 years with and without language impairments. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 333-349.
28. Rispoli, M., & Hadley, P. (2011). Toward a theory of gradual morphosyntactic learning. In I. Aron & E. V. Clark (Eds.), Experience, variation, and generalization: Learning a first language (pp. 15-34). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
29. Rispoli, M., Hadley, P., & Holt, J. (2009). The development of tense productivity. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 930-944.
30. Scarborough, H., Wyckoff, J., & Davidson, R. (1986). A reconsideration of the relation between age and mean utterance length. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 29, 394-399.
31. Schütze,C. T. (2001). Productive inventory and case/agreement contingencies: A methodological note to Rispoli (1999). Journal of Child Language, 28, 507-515.
32. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language:A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Wilson, S. (2003). Lexically specific constructions in the acquisition of inflection in English. Journal of Child Language, 30, 75-115.
34. Yang, C. (2002). Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.