Latent class nested logit model for analyzing high-speed rail access mode choice

Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 545-554

  Wen, Chieh Hua ^a   Wang, Wei Chung ^a   Fu, Chiang ^b  

^a FENG CHIA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Access mode; Latent class; Logit; Rail; Segmentation

Indexed keywords

RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION;

ACCESS MODE; CHOICE BEHAVIORS; HIGH SPEED RAIL; LATENT CLASS; LOGIT; MODE CHOICE; NESTED LOGIT MODEL; SEGMENTATION; SUBSTITUTION PATTERNS; SURVEY DATA;

MEMBERSHIP FUNCTIONS;

HETEROGENEITY; HIGH-SPEED TRAIN; LOGIT ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; RAILWAY TRANSPORT; SEGMENTATION; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

TAIWAN;

EID: 83555178499     PISSN: 13665545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2011.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Algers S. Integrated structure of long-distance travel behavior models in Sweden. Transportation Research Record 1993, 1413:141-149.
2. Aptech Systems GAUSS Version 9.0 User Guide 2008, Aptech Systems, Inc.
3. Arunotayanun K., Polak J.W. Taste heterogeneity and market segmentation in freight shippers' mode choice behaviour. Transportation Research Part E 2011, 45(2):138-148.
4. Bekhor S., Elgar A. Investment in mobility by car as an explanatory variable for market segmentation. Journal of Public Transportation 2007, 10(2):17-32.
5. Bhat C.R. An endogenous segmentation mode choice model with an application to intercity travel. Transportation Science 1997, 31(1):34-48.
6. Bodapati A.V., Gupta S. The recoverability of segmentation structure from store-level aggregate data. Journal of Marketing Research 2004, 41(3):351-364.
7. Debrezion G., Pels E., Rietveld P. Modelling the joint access mode and railway station choice. Transportation Research Part E 2009, 45(1):270-283.
8. Fan K.-S., Miller E.J., Badoe D. Modeling rail access mode and station choice. Transportation Research Record 1993, 1413:49-59.
9. Greene W.H., Hensher D.A. A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit. Transportation Research Part B 2003, 37(8):681-698.
10. Gupta S., Chintagunta P.K. On using demographic variables to determine segment membership in logit mixture models. Journal of Marketing Research 1994, 13:128-136.
11. Harvey G. Study of airport access mode choice. Journal of Transportation Engineering 1986, 112(5):525-545.
12. Hess S., Bierlaire M., Polak J.W. Capturing correlation and taste heterogeneity with mixed GEV models. Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics 2005, 55-76. Springer Publisher, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. R. Scarpa, A. Alberini (Eds.).
13. Kamakura W.A., Russell G.A. A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. Journal of Marketing Research 1989, 26(4):379-390.
14. Kamakura W.A., Kim B.-D., Lee J. Modeling preference and structural heterogeneity in consumer choice. Marketing Science 1996, 15(2):152-172.
15. Korf J.L., Demetsky M.J. Transit station classification for access mode analysis. Journal of Advanced Transportation 1980, 14(3):275-300.
16. Korf J.L., Demetsky M.J. Analysis of rapid transit access mode choice. Transportation Research Record 1981, 817:29-35.
17. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in Econometrics 1973, 105-142. Academic Press, New York. P. Zaremmbka (Ed.).
18. McFadden D. Modeling the choice of residential location. Transportation Research Record 1978, 672:72-77.
19. Ortúzar J.de D., Willumsen L.G. Modelling Transport 2001, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
20. Outwater M.L., Castleberry S., Shiftan Y., Ben-Akiva M., Zhou Y.S., Kuppam A. Attitudinal market segmentation approach to mode choice and ridership forecasting. Transportation Research Record 2004, 1854:32-42.
21. Outwater M.L., Modugula V., Castleberry S., Bhatia P. Market segmentation approach to mode choice and ferry ridership forecasting. Transportation Research Record 2004, 1872:71-79.
22. Pas E.I., Huber J.C. Market segmentation analysis of potential inter-city rail travelers. Transportation 1992, 19(2):177-196.
23. Polydoropoulou A., Ben-Akiva M. Combined revealed and stated preference nested logit access and mode choice model for multiple mass transit technologies. Transportation Research Record 2001, 1771:38-45.
24. Psaraki V., Abacoumkin C. Access mode choice for relocated airports: the new Athens international airport. Journal of Air Transport Management 2002, 8(2):89-98.
25. Rastogi R., Rao K.V.K. Segmentation analysis of commuters accessing transit: Mumbai study. Journal of Transportation Engineering 2009, 135(8):506-515.
26. Shiftan Y., Outwater M.L., Zhou Y. Transit market research using structural equation modeling and attitudinal market segmentation. Transport Policy 2008, 15(3):186-195.
27. Sobieniak J., Westin R., Rosapep T., Shin T. Choice of access mode to intercity terminals. Transportation Research Record 1979, 728:47-53.
28. Swait J. Flexible covariance structures for categorical dependent variables through finite mixtures of generalized extreme value models. Journal of Business Economic and Statistics 2003, 21(1):80-87.
29. Taiwan High Speed Rail Corporation A Report on Service Quality of Taiwan High Speed Rail Transfer Facilities: Analysis of Station Access Mode Choice 2007, Everest Engineering Consultants, Inc.
30. Train K.E. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation 2003, Cambridge University Press.
31. Tsamboulas D., Golias J., Vlahoyannis M. Model development for metro station access mode choice. Transportation 1992, 19(3):231-244.
32. Walker J.L., Li J. Latent lifestyle preferences and household location decisions. Journal of Geographical Systems 2007, 9(1):77-101.
33. Wen C.-H., Lai S.-C. Latent class models of international air carrier choice. Transportation Research Part E 2010, 46(2):211-221.
34. Zhang J., Kuwano M., Lee B., Fujiwara A. Modeling household discrete choice behavior incorporating heterogeneous group decision-making mechanisms. Transportation Research Part B 2009, 43(2):230-250.