Evolutionary engineering of yeast for closed-circulating ethanol fermentation in PDMS membrane bioreactor

Biochemical Engineering Journal

Volumn 60, Issue , 2012, Pages 56-61

  Ding, Wenwu ^a   Xiao, Zeyi ^a   Tang, Xiaoyu ^a   Deng, Kewang ^a   Fu, Shengwei ^a   Jiang, Yandong ^a   Yuan, Lin ^a  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Biofuel; Bioreactor system; Bioseparation; Evolutionary engineering; Membrane; Yeast

Indexed keywords

BIO-SEPARATION; BIOREACTOR SYSTEM; CELL CONCENTRATIONS; ETHANOL CONCENTRATIONS; ETHANOL FERMENTATION; ETHANOL PRODUCTION; ETHANOL PRODUCTIVITY; ETHANOL YIELD; EVOLUTIONARY ENGINEERING; FERMENTATION PROCESS; PARENT STRAIN; PDMS MEMBRANE; YEAST STRAIN;

BIOCONVERSION; BIOFUELS; BIOREACTORS; ETHANOL; GLUCOSE; MEMBRANES; MICROCHANNELS; PROCESS CONTROL; PRODUCTIVITY; YEAST;

FERMENTATION;

ALCOHOL;

ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; ARTICLE; BIOENGINEERING; BIOMASS FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE UTILIZATION; MEMBRANE REACTOR; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; YEAST;

EID: 83555164898     PISSN: 1369703X     EISSN: 1873295X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2011.09.019     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Attfiled P.V. Stress tolerance: the key to effective strains of industrial baker's yeast. Nat. Biotechnol. 1997, 15:1351-1357.
2. Çakar Z.P., Seker U.O.S., Tamerler C., et al. Evolutionary engineering of multiple-stress resistant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2005, 5:569-578.
3. Shojaosadati S.A., Sanaei H.R., Fatemi S.M. The use of biomass and stillage recycle in conventional ethanol fermentation. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 1996, 67:362-366.
4. Schmidt S.L., Myers M.D., Kelley S.S., et al. Evaluation of PTMSP membranes in achieving enhanced ethanol removal from fermentations by pervaporation. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 1997, 63:469-481.
5. Nguyen V.D., Kosuge H., Auresenia J., et al. Effect of vacuum pressure on ethanol fermentation. J. Appl. Sci. 2009, 9:3020-3026.
6. Bayrock D.P., Ingledew W.M. Application of multistage continuous fermentation for production of fuel alcohol by very-high-gravity fermentation technology. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 27:87-93.
7. Bai F.W., Chen L.J., Anderson W.A., et al. Parameter oscillations in very high gravity medium continuous ethanol fermentation and their attenuation on multi-stage packed column bioreactor system. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2004, 88:558-566.
8. Bai F.W., Chen L.J., Zhang Z., et al. Continuous ethanol production and evaluation of yeast cell lysis and viability loss under very high gravity medium conditions. J. Biotechnol. 2004, 110:287-293.
9. Thomas K.C., Ingledew W.M. Fuel alcohol production: effects of free amino nitrogen on fermentation of very-high-gravity wheat mash. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1990, 56:2046-2050.
10. Wang S., Thomas K.C., Sosulski K., et al. Grain pearling and very high gravity (VHG) fermentation technologies for fuel alcohol production from rye and triticale. Process Biochem. 1999, 34:421-428.
11. Alper H., Moxley J., Nevoigt E., et al. Engineering yeast transcription machinery for improved ethanol tolerance and production. Science 2006, 314:165-168.
12. Matsumoto T., Ishikawa S., Fukuda H., et al. Construction of ethanol-tolerant yeast strains with combinatorial library-selected peptides. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzymol. 2004, 28:253-257.
13. Watanabe T., Watanabe I., Yamamoto M., et al. A UV-induced mutant of Pichia stipitis with increased ethanol production from xylose and selection of a spontaneous mutant with increased ethanol tolerance. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:1844-1848.
14. Edgardo A., Carolina P., Manuel R., et al. Selection of thermotolerant yeast strains Saccharomyces cerevisiae for bioethanol production. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2008, 43:120-123.
15. Hacking A.J., Taylor I.W.F., Hanas C.M. Selection of yeast able to produce ethanol from glucose at 40°C. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1984, 19:361-363.
16. El Sheikh Idris E.T.A., Berry D.R. Selection of thermotolerant yeast strains for biomass production from Sudanese molasses. Biotechnol. Lett. 1980, 2:61-66.
17. Ballesteros I., Ballesteros M., Cabañas A. Selection of thermotolerant yeasts for simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) of cellulose to ethanol. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 1991, 28/29:307-415.
18. Banat I.M., Nigam P., Marchant R. Isolation of thermotolerant, fermentative yeasts growing at 52°C and producing ethanol at 45°C and 50°C. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1992, 8:259-263.
19. Abdel-Fattah W.R., Fadil M., Nigam P., Banat I.M. Isolation of thermotolerant ethanologenic yeasts and use of selected strains in industrial scale fermentation in an Egyptian distillery. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2000, 68:531-535.
20. Cysewski G.R., Wilke C.R. Rapid ethanol fermentations using vacuum and cell recycle. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1977, 19:1125-1143.
21. Vane L.M. A review of pervaporation for product recovery from biomass fermentation processes. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2005, 80:603-629.
22. Aires Barros M.R., Cabral J.M.S., Novais J.M. Production of ethanol by immobilized Saccharomyces bayanus in an extractive fermentation system. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1987, 109:7-1104.
23. O'Brien J.D.J., Craig J.C. Ethanol production in a continuous fermentation/membrane pervaporation system. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1996, 44:699-704.
24. Ikegami T., Yanagishita H., Kitamoto D. Production of highly concentrated ethanol in a coupled fermentation/pervaporation process using silicalite membranes. Biotechnol. Tech. 1997, 11:921-924.
25. Groot W.J., Kraayenbrink M.R., Waldram R.H. Ethanol production in an integrated process of fermentation and ethanol recovery by pervaporation. Bioprocess Eng. 1992, 8:99-111.
26. Shbtai Y., Chaimovitz A., Freeman A. Continuous ethanol production by immobilized yeast reactor coupled with membrane pervaporation unit. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1991, 38:869-876.
27. Gilbert A., Sangurdekar D.P., Srienc F. Rapid strain improvement through optimized evolution in the cytostat. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 103:500-512.
28. McBryde C., Gardner J.M., de Barros Lopes M., et al. Generation of novel wine yeast strains by adaptive evolution. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2006, 57:423-430.
29. Pitkänen J.P., Rintala E., Aristidou A., et al. Xylose chemostat isolates of Saccharomyces cerevisiae show altered metabolite and enzyme levels compared with xylose, glucose, and ethanol metabolism of the original strain. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 67:827-837.
30. Sonderegger M., Sauer U. Evolutionary engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for anaerobic growth on xylose. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69:1990-1998.
31. Guimarães Pedro M.R., François J., Parrou J.L., et al. Adaptive evolution of a lactose-consuming Saccharomyces cerevisiae recombinant. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74:1748-1756.
32. Wisselink W.H., Toirkens M.J., Wu Q.X., et al. Novel evolutionary engineering approach for accelerated utilization of glucose, xylose, and arabinose mixtures by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75:907-914.
33. Çakar Z.P., Alki{dotless}m C., Turanl B. Isolation of cobalt hyper-resistant mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by in vivo evolutionary engineering approach. J. Biotechnol. 2009, 143:130-138.
34. Liu E., Hu Y. Construction of a xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain by combined approaches of genetic engineering, chemical mutagenesis and evolutionary adaptation. Biochem. Eng. J. 2010, 48:204-210.
35. Greene C.N., Jinks-Robertson S. Comparison of spontaneous and adaptive mutation spectra in yeast. J. Genet. 1999, 78:51-55.
36. Ferea T.L., Botstein D., Brown P.O., et al. Systematic changes in gene expression patterns following adaptive evolution in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96:9721-9726.
37. Foster P.L. Adaptive mutation: implications for evolution. Bioessays 2000, 22:1067-1074.
38. Shi E., Huang W.X., Xiao Z.Y. Influence of binding interface between active and support layers in composite PDMS membranes on permeation performance. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 104:2468-2477.
39. Wu Y., Xiao Z.Y., Huang W.X., et al. Mass transfer in pervaporation of active fermentation broth with a composite PDMS membrane. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2005, 42:47-53.
40. Kiran Sree N., Sridhar M., Suresh K., et al. Isolation of thermotolerant, osmotolerant, flocculating Saccharomyces cerevisiae for ethanol production. Bioresour. Technol. 2000, 72:4.
41. Patnaik R. Engineering complex phenotypes in industrial strains. Biotechnol. Prog. 2008, 24:38-47.
42. Sauer U. Evolutionary engineering of industrially important microbial phenotypes. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 2001, 73:129-169.