Generation of novel wine yeast strains by adaptive evolution

American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 423-430

  McBryde, Colin ^a   Gardner, Jennifer M ^a   De Barros Lopes, Miguel ^b,c   Jiranek, Vladimir ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b AUSTRALIAN WINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Adaptive evolution; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Strain optimization; Wine

Indexed keywords

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 33846552965     PISSN: 00029254     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. 14C-labelled carbon from glucose and glutamate during anaerobic growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 144:1683-1690.
2. Alexandre, H., and C. Charpentier. 1998. Biochemical aspects of stuck and sluggish fermentation in grape must. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 20:20-27.
3. Ambrona, J., M. Maqueda, E. Zamora, and M. Ramírez. 2005. Sulfometuron resistance as a genetic marker for yeast populations in wine fermentations. J. Agric. Food Chem. 53:7438-7443.
4. Ansanay-Galeote, V., B. Blondin, S. Dequin, and J.M. Sablayrolles. 2001. Stress effect of ethanol on fermentation kinetics by stationary-phase cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Lett. 23:677-681.
5. Aranda, A., and M. del Olmo. 2003. Response to acetaldehyde stress in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae involves a strain-dependent regulation of the several ALD genes and is mediated by the general stress response pathway. Yeast 20:747-759.
6. Bakalinsky, A.T., and R. Snow. 1990. The chromosomal constitution of wine strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 6:367-382.
7. Bisson, L.F. 1999. Stuck and sluggish fermentations. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 50:107-119.
8. Bisson, L.F., and C.E. Butzke. 2000. Diagnosis and rectification of stuck and sluggish fermentations. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 51:168-177.
9. Boulton, R. 1980. The prediction of fermentation behavior by a kinetic model. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 31:40-45.
10. Brown, C.J., K.M. Todd, and R.F. Rosenzweig. 1998. Multiple duplications of yeast hexose transport genes in response to selection in a glucose-limited environment. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:931-942.
11. 13C-NMR and tricarboxylic acid (TCA) deletion mutant analysis of pathways for succinate formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during anaerobic fermentation. Microbiology 149:2669-2678.
12. Coleman, S.T., T.K. Fang, S.A. Rovinsky, F.J. Turano, and W.S. Moye-Rowley. 2001. Expression of a glutamate decarboxylase homologue is required for normal oxidative stress tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 276:244-250.
13. Eglinton, J.M., A.J. Heinrich, A.P. Pollnitz, P. Langridge, P.A. Henschke, and M. de Barros Lopes. 2002. Decreasing acetic acid accumulation by a glycerol overproducing strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by deleting the ALD6 aldehyde dehydrogenase gene. Yeast 19:295-301.
14. Ferea, T.L., D. Botstein, P.O. Brown, and R.F. Rosenzweig. 1999. Systematic changes in gene expression patterns following adaptive evolution in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96:9721-9726.
15. Foster, P.L. 1999. Mechanisms of stationary phase mutation: A decade of adaptive mutation. Ann. Rev. Genet. 33:57-88.
16. Heidenreich, E., R. Novotny, B. Kneidinger, V. Holzmann, and U. Wintersberger. 2003. Non-homologous end joining as an important mutagenic process in cell cycle-arrested cells. EMBO J. 22:2274-2283.
17. Henschke, P.A., and V. Jiranek. 1993. Yeasts: Metabolism of nitrogen compounds. In Wine Microbiology and Biotechnology. G.H. Fleet (Ed.), pp. 77-163. Harwood Academic Publishers, Chur.
18. Hersh, M.N., R.G Ponder, P.J. Hastings, and S.M. Rosenberg. 2004. Adaptive mutation and amplification in Escherichia coli: Two pathways of genome adaptation under stress. Res. Microbiol. 155:352-359.
19. Hand, P.G., and P. Gago. 2002. Australian Wine: Styles and Tastes. Patrick Hand, Campbell Town, Australia.
20. Lambrechts, M.G., and I.S. Pretorius. 2000. Yeast and its importance to wine aroma: A review. S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic. 21:97-129.
21. Larue, F., S. Lafon-Lafourcade, and P. Ribereau-Gayon. 1980. Relationship between the sterol content of yeast cells and their fermentation activity in grape must. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 39:808-811.
22. Nieuwoudt, H.H., B.A. Prior, I.H. Pretorius, and F. Bauer. 2002. Glycerol in South African table wines: An assessment of its relationship to wine quality. S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic. 23:22-30.
23. Orr, H.A., and S.P. Otto. 1994. Does diploidy increase the rate of adaptation? Genetics 136:1475-1480.
24. Paquin, C., and J. Adams. 1983. Frequency of fixation of adaptive mutations is higher in evolving diploid than haploid yeast populations. Nature 302:495-500.
25. Pérez, F., J.A. Regodón, M.E. Valdés, C. De Miguel, and M. Ramírez. 2000. Cycloheximide resistance as marker for monitoring yeasts in wine fermentations. Food Microbiol. 17:119-128.
26. Pretorius, I.S. 2000. Tailoring wine yeast for the new millennium: Novel approaches to the ancient art of winemaking. Yeast 16:675-729.
27. Pretorius, I.S., and F. Bauer. 2002. Meeting the consumer challenge through genetically customised wine-yeast strains. Trends Biotechnol. 20:426-432.
28. Querol, A., M.T. Fernández-Espinar, M. del Olmo, and E. Barrio. 2003. Adaptive evolution of wine yeast. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 86:3-10.
29. Romano, P., M. Paraggio, and L. Turbanti. 1998. Stability in byproduct formation as a strain selection tool of Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeasts. J. Appl. Microbiol. 84:336-341.
30. Salmon, J.M. 1996. Sluggish and stuck fermentations: Some actual trends on their physiological basis. Wein Wissen. 51:137-140.
31. Snow, R. 1983. Genetic improvement of wine yeast. In Yeast Genetics: Fundamental and Applied Aspects. J.F.T. Spencer et al. (Eds.), pp. 439-460. Springer-Verlag, New York.
32. Sonderegger, M., and U. Sauer. 2003. Evolutionary engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for anaerobic growth on xylose. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:1990-1998.
33. Tate, J.J., and T.G. Cooper. 2003. Tor1/2 regulation of retrograde gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae derives indirectly as a consequence of alterations in ammonia metabolism. J. Biol. Chem. 278:36924-36933.
34. Walker, M.E., J.M. Gardner, A. Vystavelova, C. McBryde, M. de Barros Lopes, and V. Jiranek. 2003. Application of the reuseable, KanMX selectable marker to industrial yeast: Construction and evaluation of heterothallic wine strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, possessing minimal foreign DNA sequences. FEMS Yeast Res. 4:339-347.
35. Zeyl, C. 2004. Capturing the adaptive mutation in yeast. Res. Microbiol. 155:217-223.
36. Zeyl, C., T. Vanderford, and M. Carter. 2003. An evolutionary advantage of haploidy in large yeast populations. Science 299:555-558.