Faculty and student perceptions of effective study strategies and materials

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Volumn 75, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1-6

  Suda, Katie J ^a   Bell, Gillian C ^a   Franks, Andrea S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Course design; Focus group; Learning; Technology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BOOK; COMPREHENSION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEARNING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PHARMACY STUDENT; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; SCHOOL; STUDY SKILLS; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY; COURSE DESIGN; FOCUS GROUP; PROGRAM EVALUATION; TECHNOLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; COMPREHENSION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, PHARMACY; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FACULTY; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; PERCEPTION; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SCHOOLS, PHARMACY; STUDENTS, PHARMACY; TENNESSEE; TEST TAKING SKILLS; TEXTBOOKS AS TOPIC; YOUNG ADULT;

COURSE DESIGN; FOCUS GROUP; LEARNING; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 83455218083     PISSN: 00029459     EISSN: 15536467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7510201     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Blouin RA, Riffee WH, Robinson ET, et al. Roles of innovation in education delivery. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009;73(8):Article 154.
2. Smith AR, Cavanaugh C, Jones J, Venn J, Wilson W. Influence of learning style on instructional multimedia effects on graduate student cognitive and psychomotor performance. J Allied Health. 2006;35(3): e182-e203.
3. Rizzolo LJ, Aden M, Stewart WB. Correlation of web usage and exam performance in a human anatomy and development course. Clin Anat. 2002;15(5):351-355.
4. Smith L, Saini B, Krass I, Chen T, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Sainsbury E. Pharmacy students' approaches to learning in an Australian university. Am J Pharm Educ. 2007;71(6):Article 120.
5. Smith L, Krass I, Sainsbury E, Rose G. Pharmacy students' approaches to learning in undergraduate and graduate entry programs. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010;74(6):Article 106.
6. Hagemeier NE, Mason HL. Student pharmacists' perceptions of testing and study strategies. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011;75(2):Article 35.
7. Garavalia LS, Scheuer DA, Carroll CA. Comparative analysis of first- and third-year pharmacy students' perceptions of studentregulated learning strategies and motivation. Am J Pharm Educ. 2002;66(3):219-223.
8. Instructional Assessment Resources. http://www.utexas.edu/academic/ctl/assessment/iar/programs/plan/method/focus.php. Accessed October 1, 2011.
9. Krueger RA. Developing questions for focus groups. Focus Group Kit 3. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc;1998:1-18.
10. Medina MS, Medina PJ, Wanzer DS, Wilson JE, Nelson E, Britton ML. Use of an audience response system (ARS) in a dualcampus classroom environment. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(2): Article 38.
11. Cain J, Robinson E. A primer on audience response systems: current applications and future considerations. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(4):Article 77.
12. Cain J, Black EP, Rohr J. An audience response system strategy to improve student motivation, attention, and feedback. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009;73(2):Article 21.
13. Gerzina TM, Worthington R, Byrne S, McMahon C. Student use and Perceptions of different learning aids in a problem-based learning (PBL) dentistry course. J Dent Educ. 2003;67(6):641-653.
14. Fitzpatrick L, McConnell C. Student reading strategies and textbook use: an inquiry into economics and accounting courses. Res High Educ J. Rockhurst University. http://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/09150.pdf. Accessed October 1, 2011.
15. Schneider A. Can plot improve pedagogy? novel textbooks give it a try. Chron High Educ. 2001;47(35):A12-A14.