Trial-by-trial analysis of intermanual transfer during visuomotor adaptation

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 106, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 3157-3172

  Taylor, Jordan A ^a   Wojaczynski, Greg J ^a   Ivry, Richard B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Awareness; Motor adaptation; Motor learning; Motor skills; Transfer

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; ROTATION; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL FEEDBACK; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AWARENESS; BIOFEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGY; BIOMECHANICS; CUES; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOVEMENT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; ROTATION; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 83055179235     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01008.2010     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Balitsky Thomson AK, Henriques DY. Visuomotor adaptation and intermanual transfer under different viewing conditions. Exp Brain Res 202: 543-554, 2010.
2. Beilock SL, Bertenthal BI, McCoy AM, Carr TH. Haste does not always make waste: expertise, direction of attention, and speed versus accuracy in performing sensorimotor skills. Psychon Bull Rev 11: 373, 2004.
3. Beilock SL. Understanding skilled performance: memory, attention, and choking under pressure. In: Sport and Exercise Psychology: International Perspectives, edited by Morris T, Terry P, Gordon S. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology, 2007, p. 153-166.
4. Benson BL, Anguera JA, Seidler RD. A spatial explicit strategy reduces error but interferes with sensorimotor adaptation. J Neurophysiol 105: 2843-2851, 2011.
5. Berniker M, Kording K. Estimating the sources of motor errors for adaptation and generalization. Nat Neurosci 11: 1454-1461, 2008.
6. Brashers-Krug T, Shadmehr R, Bizzi E. Consolidation in human motor memory. Nature 18: 252-255, 1996.
7. Brown LE, Wilson ET, Obhi SS, Gribble PL. Effect of trial order and error magnitude on motor learning by observing. J Neurophysiol 104: 1409-1416, 2010.
8. Cressman EK, Henriques DT. Motor adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration. J Neurophysiol 191: 91-99, 2011.
9. Criscimagna-Hemminger SE, Donchin O, Gazzaniga MS, Shadmehr R. Learned dynamics of reaching movements generalize from dominant to nondominant arm. J Neurophysiol 89: 168-176, 2003.
10. Criscimagna-Hemminger SE, Bastian AJ, Shadmehr R. Size of error affect cerebellar contributions to motor learning. J Neurophysiol 103: 2275-2284, 2010.
11. Cunningham HA, Welch RB. Multiple concurrent visual-motor mappings: implications for models of adaptation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20: 987, 1994.
12. Curran T, Keele SW. Attentional and nonattentional forms of sequence learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 19: 189, 1993.
13. Dizio P, Lackner JR. Motor adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements: endpoint but not trajectory adaptation transfers to the nonexposed arm. J Neurophysiol 74: 1787-1792, 1995.
14. Duque J, Ivry RB. Role of corticospinal suppression during motor preparation. Cereb Cortex 19: 2013-2024, 2009.
15. Fernandez-Ruiz J, Wong W, Armstrong IT, Flanagan JR. Relation between reaction time and reach errors during visuomotor adaptation. Behav Brain Res 219: 8-14, 2011.
16. Franz EA, Eliassen JC, Ivry RB, Gazzaniga MS. Dissociation of spatial and temporal coupling in the bimanual movements of callosotomy patients. Psychol Sci 7: 306-310, 1996.
17. Galea JM, Miall RC. Concurrent adaptation to opposing visual displacements during an alternating movement. Exp Brain Res 175: 676-688, 2006.
18. Galea JM, Sami SA, Albert NB, Miall RC. Secondary tasks impair adaptation to step-and gradual-visual displacements. Exp Brain Res.
19. Heuer H, Hegele M. Adaptation to visuomotor rotations in younger and older adults. Psychol Aging 23: 190-202, 2008.
20. Hwang EJ, Smith MA, Shadmehr R. Dissociable effects of the implicit and explicit memory systems on learning control of reaching. Exp Brain Res 173: 425-437, 2006.
21. Imamizu H, Shimojo S. The locus of visual-motor learning at the task or manipulator level: implications from intermanual transfer. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21: 719-733, 1995.
22. Kagerer FA, Contreras-Vidal JL, Stelmach GE. Adaptation to gradual as compared with sudden visuo-motor distortions. Exp Brain Res 115: 557-561, 1997.
23. Karni A, Meyer G, Rey-Hipolito C, Jezzard P, Adams MM, Turner R, Ungerleider LG. The acquisition of skilled motor performance: fast and slow experience-driven changes in primary motor cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 861-868, 1998.
24. Klassen J, Tong C, Flanagan JR. Learning and recall of incremental kinematic and dynamic sensorimotor transformations. Exp Brain Res 164: 250-259, 2005.
25. Kluzik J, Diedrichsen J, Shadmehr R, Bastian AJ. Reach adaptation: what determines whether we learn an internal model of the tool or adapt the model of our arm? J Neurophysiol 100: 1455-1464, 2008.
26. Malfait N, Ostry DJ. Is interlimb transfer of force-field adaptation a cognitive response to the sudden introduction of load? J Neurosci 24: 8084-8089, 2004.
27. Martin TA, Keating JG, Goodkin HP, Bastian AJ, Thach WT. Throwing while looking through prisms: II. Specificity and storage of multiple gazethrow calibrations. Brain 119: 1199, 1996.
28. Mattar AAG, Gribble PL. Motor learning by observing. Neuron 46: 153-160, 2005.
29. Mazzoni P, Krakauer JW. An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation. J Neurosci 26: 3642-3645, 2006.
30. Nelder JA, Mead R. A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7: 308-313, 1965.
31. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9: 97-113, 1971.
32. Oliveira FTP, Diedrichsen J, Verstynen T, Duque J, Ivry RB. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of posterior parietal cortex affects decisions of hand choice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 17751-17756, 2010.
33. Ostry DJ, Darainy M, Mattar AA, Wong J, Gribble PL. Somatosensory plasticity and motor learning. J Neurosci 30: 5384-5393, 2010.
34. Perruchet P, Amorim M. Conscious knowledge and changes in performance in sequence learning: evidence against dissociation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 18: 785-800, 1992.
35. Saijo N, Gomi H. Multiple motor learning strategies in visuomotor rotation. PLoS One 5: e9399, 2010.
36. Sainburg RL, Wang J. Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations: independence of direction and final position information. Exp Brain Res 145: 437-447, 2002.
37. Shadmehr R, Brashers-Krug T. Functional stages in the formation of human long-term motor memory. J Neurosci 17: 409-419, 1997.
38. Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14: 3208-3224, 1994.
39. Smith MA, Ghazizadeh A, Shadmehr R. Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning. PLoS Biol 4: e179, 2006.
40. Sülzenbrück S, Heuer H. Functional independence of explicit and implicit motor adjustments. Conscious Cogn 18: 145-159, 2009.
41. Taub E, Goldberg LA. Prism adaptation: control of intermanual transfer by distribution of practice. Science 180: 755-757, 1973.
42. Taylor HG, Heilman KM. Left-hemisphere motor dominance in righthanders. Cortex 16: 587-603, 1980.
43. Taylor JA, Ivry RB. Flexible cognitive strategies during motor learning. PLoS Comput Biol 7: e1001096, 2011.
44. Taylor JA, Klemfuss NM, Ivry RB. An explicit strategy prevails when the cerebellum fails to compute movement errors. Cerebellum 9: 580-586, 2010.
45. Wang J, Sainburg RL. Limitation in interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations. Exp Brain Res 55: 1-8, 2004.
46. Wang J, Joshi M, Lei Y. The extent of interlimb transfer following adaptation to a novel visuomotor condition does not depend on awareness of the condition. J Neurophysiol 106: 259-264, 2011.
47. Willingham DB, Nissen MJ, Bullemer P. On the development of procedural knowledge. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 15: 1047-1060, 1989.