A spatial explicit strategy reduces error but interferes with sensorimotor adaptation

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 105, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 2843-2851

  Benson, Bryan L ^a,b   Anguera, Joaquin A ^a,c   Seidler, Rachael D ^a,b  

^a Division of Kinesiology   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Catch trials; Implicit; Reaching; Recalibration; Visuomotor

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; LEARNING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORIMOTOR ADAPTATION; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AWARENESS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79959337470     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00002.2011     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abeele S, Bock O. Mechanisms for sensorimotor adaptation to rotated visual input. Exp Brain Res 139: 248-253, 2001.
2. Anguera JA, Reuter-Lorenz PA, Willingham DT, Seidler RD. Contributions of spatial working memory to visuomotor learning. J Cogn Neurosci 22: 1917-1930, 2010.
3. Arce F, Novick I, Shahar M, Link Y, Ghez C, Vaadia E. Differences in context and feedback result in different trajectories and adaptation strategies in reaching. PLoS One 4: e4214, 2009.
4. Beilock SL, Carr TH. On the fragility of skilled performance: what governs choking under pressure? J Exp Psychol Gen 130: 701-725, 2001.
5. Beilock SL, Carr TH, MacMahon C, Starkes JL. When paying attention becomes counterproductive: impact of divided versus skill-focused attention on novice and experienced performance of sensorimotor skills. J Exp Psychol Appl 8: 6-16, 2002.
6. Cameron BD, Franks IM, Inglis JT, Chua R. Implicit motor learning from target error during explicit reach control. Exp Brain Res 206: 99-104, 2010a.
7. Cameron BD, Franks IM, Inglis JT, Chua R. Reach adaptation to explicit vs. implicit target error. Exp Brain Res 203: 367-380, 2010b.
8. Castaneda B, Gray R. Effects of focus of attention on baseball batting performance in players of differing skill levels. J Sport Exerc Psychol 29: 60-77, 2007.
9. Chaparro A, Wood JM, Carberry T. Effects of age and auditory and visual dual tasks on closed-road driving performance. Optom Vis Sci 82: 747-754, 2005.
10. Dennis NA, Cabeza R. Age-related dedifferentiation of learning systems: an fMRI study of implicit and explicit learning. Neurobiol Aging. In press.
11. Diedrichsen J, White O, Newman D, Lally N. Use-dependent and error-based learning of motor behaviors. J Neurosci 30: 5159-5166, 2010.
12. Eversheim U, Bock O. Evidence for processing stages in skill acquisition: a dual-task study. Learn Mem 8: 183-189, 2001.
13. Fernandez-Ruiz J, Wong W, Armstrong IT, Flanagan JR. Relation between reaction time and reach errors during visuomotor adaptation. Behav Brain Res 219: 8-14, 2011.
14. Flegal KE, Anderson MC. Overthinking skilled motor performance: or why those who teach can't do. Psychon Bull Rev 15: 927-932, 2008.
15. Galea JM, Albert NB, Ditye T, Miall RC. Disruption of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex facilitates the consolidation of procedural skills. J Cogn Neurosci 22: 1158-1164, 2010.
16. Hahn M, Falkenstein M, Wild-Wall N. Age-related performance differences in compensatory tracking under a dual task condition. Occupational Ergonomics 9: 75-86, 2010.
17. Heathcote A, Brown S, Mewhort DJ. The power law repealed: the case for an exponential law of practice. Psychon Bull Rev 7: 185-207, 2000.
18. Hegele M, Heuer H. Implicit and explicit components of dual adaptation to visuomotor rotations. Conscious Cogn 19: 906-917, 2010.
19. Izawa J, Rane T, Donchin O, Shadmehr R. Motor adaptation as a process of reoptimization. J Neurosci 28: 2883-2891, 2008.
20. Jakobson LS, Goodale MA. Trajectories of reaches to prismatically-displaced targets: evidence for "automatic" visuomotor recalibration. Exp Brain Res 78: 575-587, 1989.
21. Jordan K, Heinze HJ, Lutz K, Kanowski M, Jäncke L. Cortical activations during the mental rotation of different visual objects. Neuroimage 13: 143-152, 2001.
22. Kawato M. Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9: 718-727, 1999.
23. Logie RH, Della Sala S, Beschin N, Denis M. Dissociating mental transformations and visuo-spatial storage in working memory: Evidence from representational neglect. Memory 13: 430-434, 2005.
24. Malone LA, Bastian AJ. Thinking about walking: effects of conscious correction versus distraction on locomotor adaptation. J Neurophysiol 103: 1954-1962, 2010.
25. Masters RS, Poolton JM, Maxwell JP, Raab M. Implicit motor learning and complex decision making in time-constrained environments. J Mot Behav 40: 71-79, 2008.
26. Mazzoni P, Krakauer JW. An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation. J Neurosci 26: 3642-3645, 2006.
27. Perkins-Ceccato N, Passmore SR, Lee TD. Effects of focus of attention depend on golfers' skill. J Sports Sci 21: 593-600, 2003.
28. Pisella L, Michel C, Grea H, Tilikete C, Vighetto A, Rossetti Y. Preserved prism adaptation in bilateral optic ataxia: strategic versus adaptive reaction to prisms. Exp Brain Res 156: 399-408, 2004.
29. Poolton JM, Maxwell JP, Masters RS, Raab M. Benefits of an external focus of attention: common coding or conscious processing? J Sports Sci 24: 89-99, 2006.
30. Redding GM, Wallace B. Adaptive spatial alignment and strategic perceptual-motor control. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22: 379-394, 1996.
31. Remy F, Wenderoth N, Lipkens K, Swinnen SP. Dual-task interference during initial learning of a new motor task results from competition for the same brain areas. Neuropsychologia 48: 2517-2527, 2010.
32. Rossetti Y, Rode G, Pisella L, Farne A, Li L, Boisson D, Perenin MT. Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect. Nature 395: 166-169, 1998.
33. Saijo N, Gomi H. Multiple motor learning strategies in visuomotor rotation. PLoS One 5: e9399, 2010.
34. Schenk T, Schindler I, McIntosh RD, Milner AD. The use of visual feedback is independent of visual awareness: evidence from visual extinction. Exp Brain Res 167: 95-102, 2005.
35. Seidler RD, Benson BL, Boyden NB, Kwak Y. Motor skill acquisition. In: The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Neuroscience, edited by Ochsner K and Kosslyn S. New York: Oxford Univ. Press. In press.
36. Shadmehr R, Krakauer JW. A computational neuroanatomy for motor control. Exp Brain Res 185: 359-381, 2008.
37. Sulzenbruck S, Heuer H. Functional independence of explicit and implicit motor adjustments. Conscious Cogn 18: 145-159, 2009.
38. Taylor JA, Thoroughman KA. Divided attention impairs human motor adaptation but not feedback control. J Neurophysiol 98: 317-326, 2007.
39. Taylor JA, Thoroughman KA. Motor adaptation scaled by the difficulty of a secondary cognitive task. PLoS One 3: e2485, 2008.
40. Teasdale N, Bard C, Fleury M, Young DE, Proteau L. Determining movement onsets from temporal series. J Mot Behav 25: 97-106, 1993.
41. Thoroughman KA, Shadmehr R. Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives. Nature 407: 742-747, 2000.
42. Todorov E, Jordan MI. Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci 5: 1226-1235, 2002.
43. van Asseldonk EH, Wessels M, Stienen AH, van der Helm FC, van der Kooij H. Influence of haptic guidance in learning a novel visuomotor task. J Physiol (Paris) 103: 276-285, 2009.
44. Werner S, Bock O. Effects of variable practice and declarative knowledge on sensorimotor adaptation to rotated visual feedback. Exp Brain Res 178: 554-559, 2007.
45. Wester AE, Bocker KB, Volkerts ER, Verster JC, Kenemans JL. Eventrelated potentials and secondary task performance during simulated driving. Accid Anal Prev 40: 1-7, 2008.
46. Willingham DB. A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning. Psychol Rev 105: 558-584, 1998.
47. Willingham DB, Salidis J, Gabrieli JD. Direct comparison of neural systems mediating conscious and unconscious skill learning. J Neurophysiol 88: 1451-1460, 2002.
48. Wulf G, McNevin N, Shea CH. The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus. Q J Exp Psychol A 54: 1143-1154, 2001.
49. Zachry T, Wulf G, Mercer J, Bezodis N. Increased movement accuracy and reduced EMG activity as the result of adopting an external focus of attention. Brain Res Bull 67: 304-309, 2005.