Validation of the extended ICF core set for stroke from the patient perspective using focus groups

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 157-166

  Glässel, Andrea ^a,b,c   Coenen, Michaela ^b,c   Kollerits, Barbara ^b,c   Cieza, Alarcos ^a,b,c  

^a SWISS PARAPLEGIC RESEARCH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c ICF   (Germany)

Author keywords

ICF; ICF core set; Patient perspective; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; DISABLED PERSON; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; INTERVIEW; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STANDARD; STROKE; VALIDATION STUDY; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENTS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STROKE; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

EID: 82955217351     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2011.593680     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. World Health Organization. WHO Steps stroke manual: The WHOStepwise approach to stroke surveillance. 2006.
2. Peoples H, Satink T, Steultjens E. Stroke survivors' experiences of rehabilitation:A systematic review of qualitative studies. Scand J OccupTher 2011;18:163-171.
3. Pellerin C, Rochette A, Racine E. Social participation of relatives poststroke:The role of rehabilitation and related ethical issues. Disabil Rehabil2011;33:1055-1064.
4. Royal College of Physicians. Intercollegiate stroke working party. Nationalclinical guideline for stroke, 3rd edition. 2008.
5. O'Sullivan C, Chard G. An exploration of participation in leisure activitiespost-stroke. Aust Occup Ther J 2010;57:159-166.
6. WHO. WHO rehabilitation after cardiovascular diseases, with specialemphasis on developing countries. Report of WHO expert committee.WHO, Geneva.
7. O'Donovan MA, Doyle A, Gallagher P. Barriers, activities and participation:Incorporating ICF into service planning datasets. DisabilRehabil 2009;31:2073-2080.
8. Geyh S, Cieza A, Schouten J, Dickson H, Frommelt P, Omar Z, KostanjsekN, Ring H, Stucki G. ICF core sets for stroke. J Rehabil Med2004;(44 Suppl):135-41. (Pubitemid 39307123)
9. Grill E, Lipp B, Boldt C, Stucki G, Koenig E. Identification of relevantICF categories by patients with neurological conditions in early postacuterehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:459-465. (Pubitemid 40711876)
10. Stier-Jarmer M, Grill E, Ewert T, Bartholomeyczik S, Finger M,Mokrusch T, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. ICF Core Set for patients withneurological conditions in early post-acute rehabilitation facilities.Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:389-395. (Pubitemid 40711868)
11. Ewert T, Grill E, Bartholomeyczik S, Finger M, Mokrusch T, KostanjsekN, Stucki G. ICF Core Set for patients with neurological conditionsin the acute hospital. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:367-373. (Pubitemid 40711865)
12. Glässel A, Kirchberger I, Kollerits B, Amann E, Cieza A. Content Validityof the Extended ICF Core Set for Stroke: An international delphisurvey of physical therapists. Phys Ther 2011;91:1211-1222.
13. Glässel A, Kirchberger I, Linseisen E, Stamm T, Cieza A, Stucki G.Content validation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set for stroke: The perspective ofoccupational therapists. Can J Occup Ther 2010;77:289-302.
14. Lemberg I, Kirchberger I, Stucki G, Cieza A. The ICF Core Set forstroke from the perspective of physicians: A worldwide validationstudy usingthe Delphi technique. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med2010;46:377-388.
15. Algurén B, Lundgren-Nilsson A, Sunnerhagen KS. Functioning ofstroke survivors-A validation of the ICF core set for stroke in Sweden.Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:551-559.
16. Starrost K, Geyh S, Trautwein A, Grunow J, Ceballos-Baumann A,Prosiegel M, Stucki G, Cieza A. Interrater reliability of the extendedICF core set for stroke applied by physical therapists. Phys Ther2008;88:841-851. (Pubitemid 351915340)
17. Ewert T, Fuessl M, Cieza A, Andersen C, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N,Stucki G. Identification of the most common patient problems inpatientswith chronic conditions using the ICF checklist. J RehabilMed 2004;(44 Suppl):22-29. (Pubitemid 39307107)
18. Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research in health care. Assessing qualityin qualitative research. BMJ 2000;320:50-52. (Pubitemid 30173021)
19. Giacomini MK, Cook DJ. Users' guides to the medical literature:XXIII. Qualitative research in health care A. Are the results of thestudy valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA2000;284:357-362. (Pubitemid 30469863)
20. Murphy E, Dingwall R, Greatbatch D, Parker S, Watson P. Qualitativeresearch methods in health technology assessment: A review of theliterature. Health Technol Assess 1998;2:1-274.
21. Sim J. Collecting and analysing qualitative data: Issues raised by thefocus group. J Adv Nurs 1998;28:345-352. (Pubitemid 128451674)
22. Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care.Analysing qualitative data. BMJ 2000;320:114-116.
23. Erikson A, Park M, Tham K. Belonging: A qualitative, longitudinalstudy of what matters for persons after stroke during the one year ofrehabilitation. J Rehabil Med 2010;42:831-838.
24. Carr A, Hewlett S, Hughes R, Mitchell H, Ryan S, Carr M, KirwanJ. Rheumatology outcomes: The patient's perspective. J Rheumatol2003;30:880-883. (Pubitemid 36402793)
25. Kirwan J, Heiberg T, Hewlett S, Hughes R, Kvien T, Ahlmèn M, BoersM et al. Outcomes from the patient perspective workshop at OMERACT6. J Rheumatol 2003;30:868-872. (Pubitemid 36402790)
26. Kirwan JR, Hewlett SE, Heiberg T, Hughes RA, Carr M, Hehir M,Kvien TK, et al. Incorporating the patient perspective into outcomeassessment in rheumatoid arthritis-progress at OMERACT 7. J Rheumatol2005;32:2250-2256. (Pubitemid 41587877)
27. Guise J, McKinlay A, Widdicombe S. The impact of early stroke onidentity: A discourse analytic study. Health (London) 2010;14:75-90.
28. Guise J, McKinlay A, Widdicombe S. The impact of early stroke onidentity: A discourse analytic study. Health (London) 2010;14:75-90.
29. Bäckström B, Sundin K. The experience of being a middle-aged closerelative of a person who has suffered a stroke, 1 year after dischargefrom a rehabilitation clinic: A qualitative study. Int J Nurs Stud2009;46:1475-1484.
30. Coenen M, Cieza A, Stamm TA, Amann E, Kollerits B, Stucki G. Validationof the International Classification of Functioning, Disabilityand Health (ICF) Core Set for rheumatoid arthritis from the patientperspective using focus groups. Arthritis Res Ther 2006;8:84.
31. Stamm TA, Cieza A, Coenen M, Machold KP, Nell VP, Smolen JS,Stucki G. Validating the International Classification of Functioning,Disability and Health Comprehensive Core Set for RheumatoidArthritis from the patient perspective: A qualitative study. ArthritisRheum 2005;53:431-439. (Pubitemid 40799884)
32. Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1990. English.
33. Glaser BG, Strauss, AL. Discovery of grounded theory. Strategies forqualitative research. Chicago: Aldine; 1967.
34. Krueger R, Casey M. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research.Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2000.
35. Kirchberger I, Coenen M, Hierl FX, Dieterle C, Seissler J, Stucki G,Cieza A. Validation of the International Classification of Functioning,Disability and Health (ICF) core set for diabetes mellitus from thepatient perspective using focus groups. Diabet Med 2009;26:700-707.
36. Karlsson G. Psychological qualitative research from a phenomenologicalperspective. Stockholm, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell International;1993. English.
37. Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, Amman E, Kollerits B, Chatterji S,Ustün TB, Stucki G. Linking health-status measurements to the internationalclassification of functioning, disability and health. J RehabilMed 2002;34:205-210.
38. Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Ustün B, Stucki G. ICFlinking rules: An update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med2005;37:212-218. (Pubitemid 41025328)
39. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ PsycholMeas 1960;20:37-46.
40. Vierkant R. A SAS macro for calculating bootstrapped confidence intervalsabout a ? coefficient. [cited 2011 Feb 20] Available from: Http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi22/STATS/PAPER295.PDF. Accessedon 20 February 2011.
41. Hägg M, Anniko M. Lip muscle training in stroke patients with dysphagia.Acta Otolaryngol 2008;128:1027-1033.
42. Ryerson S, Byl NN, Brown DA, Wong RA, Hidler JM. Altered trunkposition sense and its relation to balance functions in people poststroke.J Neurol Phys Ther 2008;32:14-20.
43. Franceschini M, La Porta F, Agosti M, Massucci M. ICR2 group.Is health-related-quality of life of stroke patients influenced byneurologicalimpairments at one year after stroke? Eur J Phys RehabilMed 2010;46:389-399.
44. Lawrence M. Young adults' experience of stroke: A qualitative reviewof the literature. Br J Nurs 2010;19:241-248.
45. Hacker VL, Stark D, Thomas S. Validation of the stroke aphasicdepression questionnaire using the brief assessment schedule depressioncards in an acute stroke sample. Br J Clin Psychol 2010;49:123-127.
46. Franzén-Dahlin A, Laska AC, Larson J, Wredling R, Billing E, MurrayV. Predictors of life situation among significant others of depressed oraphasic stroke patients. J Clin Nurs 2008;17:1574-1580.
47. Naess H, Hammersvik L, Skeie GO. Aphasia among young patientswith ischemic stroke on long-term follow-up. J Stroke CerebrovascDis 2009;18:247-250.
48. Ponsford AS, Viitanen M, Lundberg C, Johansson K. Assessmentof driving after stroke-Apluridisciplinary task. Accid Anal Prev2008;40:452-460.
49. Logan PA, Dyas J, Gladman JR. Using an interview study of transportuse by people who have had a stroke to inform rehabilitation. ClinRehabil 2004;18:703-708. (Pubitemid 39248401)
50. Dalemans RJ, De Witte LP, Beurskens AJ, Van Den Heuvel WJ, WadeDT. An investigation into the social participation of stroke survivorswith aphasia. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:1678-1685.
51. Plante M, Demers L, Swaine B, Desrosiers J. Association between dailyactivities following stroke rehabilitation and social role functioningupon return to the community. Top Stroke Rehabil 2010;17:47-57.
52. Greenwood N, Mackenzie A, Cloud G, Wilson N. Loss of autonomy,control and independence when caring: A qualitative study of informalcarers of stroke survivors in the first three months after discharge.Disabil Rehabil 2009;1:1-9.
53. Tjulin A, Maceachen E, Ekberg K. Exploring workplace actors experiencesof the social organization of return-to-work. J Occup Rehabil2010;20:311-321.
54. Tjulin A, Edvardsson Stiwne E, Ekberg K. Experience of the implementationof a multi-stakeholder return-to-work programme. J OccupRehabil 2009;19:409-418.
55. O'Brien AN, Wolf TJ. Determining work outcomes in mild to moderatestroke survivors. Work 2010;36:441-447.
56. Amir Z, Wynn P, Chan F, Strauser D, Whitaker S, Luker K. Return-toworkafter cancer in the UK: Attitudes and experiences of line managers.J Occup Rehabil 2009;20:435-442.
57. Young AE. Return-to-work following disabling occupational injury-facilitators of employment continuation. Scand J Work Environ Health2010;36:473-483.
58. Gilworth G, Phil M, Cert A, Sansam KA, Kent RM. Personal experiencesof returning to work following stroke: An exploratory study.Work 2009;34:95-103.
59. Tjulin A, Maceachen E, Ekberg K. Exploring the meaning of earlycontact in return-to-work from workplace actors' perspective. DisabilRehabil 2011;33:137-145.
60. Cieza A, Bickenbach J, Chatterji S. The ICF as a conceptual platformto specify and discuss health and health-related concepts. Gesundheitswesen2008;70: e47-e56.
61. Krueger RA. The future of focus groups. Qualitative Health Research1995;5:524-30.
62. Morgan DL. Focus groups as qualitative research. 2nd ed. NewburyPark: Sage Publications; 1997.
63. Carey A. The group effect in focus groups: Planning, implementing,and interpreting focus group research. London: Sage;1994. pp 225-41.
64. Denzin N. The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociologicalmethods. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
65. Barbour RS. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: Acase of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ 2001;322:1115-1117. (Pubitemid 32411191)
66. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categoricaldata. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174.
67. Hieblinger R, Coenen M, Stucki G, Winkelmann A, Cieza A. Validationof the International Classification of Functioning, Disability andHealth Core Set for chronic widespread pain from the perspective offibromyalgia patients. Arthritis Res Ther 2009;11:R67.
68. Peyrin-Biroulet L, Cieza A, Sandborn WJ, Coenen M, Chowers Y, HibiT, Kostanjsek N et al. The International Programme to Develop NewIndexes for Crohn's Disease (IPNIC) group. Development of the firstdisability index for inflammatory bowel disease based on the internationalclassification of functioning, disability and health. Gut 2011. Inpress.