Experience of the implementation of a multi-stakeholder return-to-work programme

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 409-418

  Tjulin, Åsa ^a   Edvardsson Stiwne, Elinor ^a   Ekberg, Kerstin ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Implementation; Qualitative; Return to work programme; Sweden; Workplace

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE MANAGEMENT; CONSULTATION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PROGRAM; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; PEER GROUP; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RETURN TO WORK PROGRAM; SWEDEN; WORK CAPACITY; WORKPLACE;

EMPLOYMENT; HUMANS; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICES; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES; SICK LEAVE; SWEDEN; WORK CAPACITY EVALUATION;

EID: 70450267485     PISSN: 10530487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10926-009-9195-y     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. P Loisel M Durand D Berthelette N Vezina R Baril D Gagnon, et al. 2001 Disability prevention: new paradigm for the management of occupational back pain Dis Manag Health Outcomes 9 7 351 360 10.2165/00115677-200109070-00001
2. IZ Schultz AW Stowell M Feuerstein RJ Gatchel 2007 Models of return to work for musculoskeletal disorders J Occup Rehabil 17 2 327 352 10.1007/s10926-007-9071-6 17286211 (Pubitemid 46900650)
3. WS Shaw M Feuerstein 2004 Generating workplace accommodations: lessons learned from the integrated case management study J Occup Rehabil 14 3 207 216 10.1023/B:JOOR.0000022762.66807.2d 15156779 (Pubitemid 39013025)
4. Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, van Tulder M, Roine R, Jauhiainen M, Hurri H, et al. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for neck and shoulder pain among working age adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(2):1-19.
5. RM Williams MG Westmorland CA Lin G Schmuck M Creen 2007 Effectiveness of workplace rehabilitation interventions in the treatment of work-related low back pain: a systematic review Disabil Rehabil 29 8 607 624 10.1080/ 09638280600841513 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s3ksVOguw%3D%3D 17453982 (Pubitemid 46554283)
6. E MacEachen J Clarke RL Franche E Irvin 2006 Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury Scand J Work Environ Health 32 4 257 269 16932823
7. RL Franche R Baril W Shaw M Nicholas P Loisel 2005 Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: optimizing the role of stakeholders in implementation and research J Occup Rehabil 15 4 525 542 10.1007/s10926-005- 8032-1 16254753 (Pubitemid 41563573)
8. DE Shrey 2000 Worksite disability management model for effective return-to-work planning Occup Med 15 4 789 801 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7gslKruw%3D%3D 11013057
9. C Briand MJ Durand L St-Arnaud M Corbiere 2007 Work and mental health: Learning from return-to-work rehabilitation programs designed for workers with musculoskeletal disorders Int J Law Psychiatry 30 4-5 444 457 10.1016/j.ijlp.2007.06.014 17673291 (Pubitemid 47516687)
10. P Loisel R Buchbinder R Hazard R Keller I Scheel M van Tulder, et al. 2005 Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence J Occup Rehabil 15 4 507 524 10.1007/s10926-005-8031-2 16254752 (Pubitemid 41563572)
11. Fixsen DL, Naoom SF, Blasé KA, Friedman RM, Wallace F. Implementation research: a synthesis of the literature. Tampa: University of South Florida, Louise de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network; 2005.
12. A. Lagen om allmänn försäkring. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet; 1962. p. 381.
13. Personalkontoret. ReKom Projektbeskrivning. Norrköpings kommun; 2005.
14. Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. London: Sage; 2002.
15. Neuman WL. Social research methods. Qualitative and quantitative approaches. USA: Pearson; 2006.
16. Kvale S. InterViews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1996.
17. Vetenskapsrådet. Forskningsetiska principer inom humanistisk-samhällsvetenskaplig forskning: Vetenskapsrådet; 1990.
18. BB Arnetz B Sjogren B Rydehn R Meisel 2003 Early workplace intervention for employees with musculoskeletal-related absenteeism: a prospective controlled intervention study J Occup Environ Med 45 5 499 506 10.1097/01.jom.0000063628. 37065.45 12762074 (Pubitemid 36582935)
19. N Krause LK Dasinger F Neuhauser 1998 Modified work and returns to work: a review of the literature J Occup Rehabil 8 2 113 139 10.1023/A:1023015622987 (Pubitemid 28294710)
20. W Shaw QN Hong G Pransky P Loisel 2008 A literature review describing the role of return-to-work coordinators in trial programs and interventions designed to prevent workplace disability J Occup Rehabil 18 1 2 15 10.1007/s10926-007-9115-y 18080827
21. C Nordqvist C Holmqvist K Alexanderson 2003 Views of laypersons on the role employers play in return to work when sick-listed J Occup Rehabil 13 1 11 20 10.1023/A:1021841722613 12611027 (Pubitemid 36581851)
22. K Holmgren SD Ivanoff 2007 Supervisors' views on employer responsibility in the return to work process. A focus group study J Occup Rehabil 4 1 93 106 10.1007/s10926-006-9041-4 (Pubitemid 46318845)
23. R Baril D Berthelette P Massicotte 2003 Early return to work of injured workers: multidimensional patterns of individual and organizational factors Saf Sci 41 4 277 300 10.1016/S0925-7535(02)00039-5 (Pubitemid 36042801)
24. E MacEachen A Kosny S Ferrier 2007 Unexpected barriers in return to work: lessons learned from injured worker peer support groups Work 29 2 155 164 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2srgs1OlsA%3D%3D 17726291
25. G Waddell AK Burton 2005 Concepts of rehabilitation for the management of low back pain Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 19 4 655 670 10.1016/j.berh.2005. 03.008 15949782 (Pubitemid 40790493)
26. Lipsky M. Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of individuals in public service. New York: Russel Sage Foundation; 1980.
27. MN Friesen A Yassi J Cooper 2001 Return-to-work: the importance of human interactions and organizational structures Work 17 1 11 22 12441618
28. A Larsson G Gard 2003 How can the rehabilitation planning process at the workplace be improved? A qualitative study from employers' perspective J Occup Rehabil 13 3 169 181 10.1023/A:1024953218252 12966691 (Pubitemid 37081762)
29. G Pransky W Shaw R McLellan 2001 Employer attitudes, training, and return-to-work outcomes: a pilot study Assist Technol 13 2 131 138 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2Fitl2jsQ%3D%3D 12530840
30. WS Shaw MM Robertson RK McLellan S Verma G Pransky 2006 A controlled case study of supervisor training to optimize response to injury in the food processing industry Work 26 107 114 16477102
31. JM Eakin 1992 Leaving it up to the workers: sociological perspective on the management of health and safety in small workplaces Int J Health Serv 22 4 689 704 10.2190/DNV0-57VV-FJ7K-8KU5 1:STN:280:DyaK3s%2FhsVCisQ%3D%3D 1399176
32. K Holmgren S Dahlin Ivanoff 2004 Women on sickness absence-views of possibilities and obstacles for returning to work. A focus group study Disabil Rehabil 26 4 213 222 10.1080/09638280310001644898 15164955 (Pubitemid 38325152)
33. Walt G. Health policy. An introduction to process and power. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press; 1994.
34. D Gardner 2000 Barriers to the implementation of management systems: lessons from the past Qual Assur 8 1 3 10 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnmsVOrtQ%3D%3D 11710305
35. PA Sabatier 1986 Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: a critical analysis and suggested synthesis J Public Policy 6 1 21 84 10.1017/S0143814X00003846
36. Winter S. Integrating implementation research. In: Palumbo DJ, Calista DJ, editors. Implementation and the policy process. Opening up the black box. New York: Greenwood press; 1990.
37. BR Crisp H Swerissen SJ Duckett 2000 Four approaches to capacity building in health: consequences for measurement and accountability Health Promot Int 15 2 99 107 10.1093/heapro/15.2.99