Revising beliefs about the merit of unconscious thought: Evidence in favor of the null hypothesis

Social Cognition

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 711-726

  Newell, Ben R ^a   Rakow, Tim ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 82955194618     PISSN: 0278016X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/soco.2011.29.6.711     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Acker, F. (2008). New fndings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making: Additional empirical data and meta-analysis. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 292-303.
2. Bem, D. J. (2011). Feeling the future: Experi-mental evidence for anomalous retroac-tive infuences on cognition and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psycholo-gy, 100, 407-425.
3. Berry, D. A. (1996). Statistics: A Bayesian per-spective. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/ Duxbury.
4. Calvillo, D. P., & Penazola, A. (2009). Are complex decisions better left to the unconscious? Further failed replications of the deliberation- without-attention effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 509-517.
5. Cohen, J. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45, 1304-1312.
6. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
7. Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p .05). American Psychologist 49, 997-1003
8. de Vries, M., Witteman, C.L.M., Holland, R. W., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2010). The unconscious thought effect in clinical deci-sion making: An example in diagnosis. Medical Decision Making, 30, 578-581.
9. Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Mac-millan.
10. Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian vs. orthodox statis-tics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 274-290.
11. Dijksterhuis, A. (2004). Think different: The merits of unconscious thought in prefer-ence development in decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psycholo-gy, 87, 586-598. (Pubitemid 39525574)
12. Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Nordgren, L. F., & Van Baaren, R. B. (2006). On making the right choice: The deliberation-without-attention effect. Science, 311, 1005-1007. (Pubitemid 43271728)
13. Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Van der Leij, A., & Van Baaren, R. (2009). Predicting soc-cer matches after unconscious and con-scious thought as a function of expertise. Psychological Science, 20, 1381-1387.
14. Dijksterhuis, A., & Meurs, T. (2006). Where cre-ativity resides: The generative power of unconscious thought. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 135-146.
15. Dijksterhuis, A., & Nordgren, L. F (2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspec-tives on Psychological Science, 1, 95-109.
16. Edwards, W., Lindman, H., & Savage, L. J. (1963). Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research. Psychological Review, 70, 193-242.
17. Fisher, R. A. (1935). The design of experiments. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd
18. Fisher, R. A. (1955). Statistical methods and scientifc induction. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (B), 17, 69-78.
19. Gigerenzer, G. (1993). The superego, the ego, and the id in statistical reasoning. In G. Keren & C. Lewis (Eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences: Methodological issues (pp. 311-339). Hills-dale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Gigerenzer, G., Swijtink, Z. G., Porter, T. M., Daston, L., Beatty, J., & Krüger, L. (1989). The empire of chance: How probability changed science and everyday life. Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Glöckner, A., & Witteman, C.L.M. (2010). Be-yond dual-process models: A categori-sation of processes underlying intuitive judgement and decision making. Thin-king & Reasoning, 16, 1-25.
22. Gonzalez-Vallejo, C., Lassiter, G. D., Bellezza, F. S., & Lindberg, M. J. (2008). "Save angels perhaps": A critical examination of unconscious thought theory and the deliberation-without-attention effect. Review of General Psychology, 12, 282-296.
23. Greenwald, A. G. (1993). Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis. In G. Keren & C. Lewis (Eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences: Methodological issues (pp. 419-448). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Ham, J., & Van den Bos, K. (2010). On uncon-scious morality: The effects of uncon-scious thinking on moral decision making. Social Cognition, 28, 74-83.
25. Ham, J., Van den Bos, K., & Van Doorn, E.A. (2009). Lady justice thinks unconscious-ly: Unconscious thought can lead to more accurate justice judgments. Social Cognition, 27, 509-521.
26. Hogarth, R. M. (2010). Intuition: A challenge for psychological research on decision making. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 338-353.
27. Hogben, L. (1970). Signifcance as interpreted by the school of R. A. Fisher. In D. E. Morrison & R. E. Henkel (Eds.), The si-gnifcance test controversy: A reader (pp. 41-56). London: Butterworths.
28. Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability. Oxford, UK Oxford University Press.
29. Lassiter, G. D., Lindberg, M. J., Gonzalez-Vallejo, C., Bellezza, F. S., & Phillips, N. D. (2009). The deliberation-without-attention effect: Evidence for an artifac-tual interpretation. Psychological Science, 20, 671-675.
30. Lindley, D. V (1971). Making decisions. London: Wiley.
31. Mamede, S., Schmidt, H. G, Rikers, R.M.J.P, Custers, E.J.F.M., Splinter, T.A.W., & Van Saase, J.L.C.M. (2010). Conscious thought beats deliberation without at-tention at least when you are an expert. Psychological Research, 74, 586-592.
32. Matthews, W. J. (in press). What might judg-ment and decision making research be like if we took a Bayesian approach to hypothesis testing? Judgment and Decisi-on Making.
33. Meehl, P. E. (1967). Theory testing in psychol-ogy and physics: A methodological par-adox. Philosophy of Science, 34, 103-115.
34. Meehl, P. E. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabu-lar asterisks: Karl, Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806-834. (Pubitemid 8396408)
35. Newell, B. R., Lagnado, D. A., & Shanks, D. R. (2007). Straight choices: The psychology of decision making. Hove, UK Psychology Press.
36. Newell, B. R., Wong, K. Y., Cheung, C.H.J., & Rakow, T. (2009). Think, blink or sleep on it? The impact of modes of thought on complex decision making. The Quar-terly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 707-732.
37. Payne, J. W., Samper, A., Bettman, J. R., & Luce, M. F. (2008). Boundary conditions on unconscious thought in complex deci-sion making. Psychological Science, 19, 1118-1123.
38. Rey, A., Goldstein, R. M., & Perruchet, P. (2009). Does unconscious thought improve complex decision making? Psychological Research, 73, 372-379.
39. Rosenthal, R. (1979). The fle drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psycholo-gical Bulletin, 86, 638-641.
40. Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2011). A Bayes-factor meta analysis of Bem's ESP claim. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 682-689.
41. Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 225-237.
42. Rozeboom, W. W. (1960). The fallacy of the null-hypothesis signifcance test. Psy-chological Bulletin, 57, 416-428.
43. Shanks, D. R. (2006). Complex choices bet-ter made unconsciously? Science, 313, 760-761.
44. Srinivasan, N., & Mukherjee, S. (2010). Attri-bute preference and selection in multi-attribute decision making: Implications for conscious and unconscious thought. Consciousness & Cognition, 19, 644-652.
45. Strick, M., Dijksterhuis, A., & Van Baaren, R. (2010). Unconscious thought effects take place off-line, not on-line. Psychological Science, 21, 484-488.
46. Thorsteinson, T. J., & Withrow, S. (2009). Does unconscious thought outperform con-scious thought on complex decisions? A further examination. Judgement and Decision Making, 4, 235-247.
47. Usher, M., Russo, Z., Weyers, M., Brauner, R., & Zakay, D. (2011). The impact of the mode of thought in complex decisions: Intuitive decisions are better. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1-13.
48. Wagenmakers,E-J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., & Van der Maas, H.L.J. (2011). Why psy-chologists must change the way they an-alyze their data: The case of psi. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 432-436.
49. Waroquier, L., Marchiori, D., Klein, O., & Cleer-emans, A. (2010). Is it better to think unconsciously or to trust your frst impres-sion? A reassessment of unconscious thought theory. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 111-118.
50. Wetzels, R., Matzke, D., Lee, M. D., Rouder, J. N., Iverson, G. J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011). Statistical evidence in experi-mental psychology: An empirical com-parison using 855 t tests. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 291-298.
51. Zhong, C., Dijksterhuis, A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). The merits of unconscious thought in creativity Psychological Science, 19, 912-918.
52. Zilak, S.T., & McCloskey, D.N. (2008). The cult of statistical signifcance: How the standard error costs us jobs, justice and lives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.