Discovery and evaluation of potential sonic hedgehog signaling pathway inhibitors using pharmacophore modeling and molecular dynamics simulations

Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology

Volumn 9, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2011, Pages 15-35

  Hwang, Swan ^a   Thangapandian, Sundarapandian ^a   Lee, Yuno ^a   Sakkiah, Sugunadevi ^a   John, Shalini ^a   Lee, Keun Woo ^a  

^a Gyeongsang National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

drug design; molecular dynamics simulation; pharmacophore; robotnikinin; Sonic hedgehog

Indexed keywords

LACTAM; LACTONE; ROBOTNIKININ; SONIC HEDGEHOG PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; DRUG ANTAGONISM; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; EVALUATION; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BINDING SITES; CATALYTIC DOMAIN; HEDGEHOG PROTEINS; LACTAMS; LACTONES; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 82955186895     PISSN: 02197200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219720011005732     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Shahi MH, Sinha S, Afzal M, Castresana JS, Role of sonic hedgehog signaling pathwayin neuroblastoma development, Biol and Med 1:1-6, 2009.
2. Scales SJ, de Sauvage FJ, Mechanisms of hedgehog pathway activation in cancer andimplications for therapy, Trends Pharmacol Sci 30:303-312, 2009.
3. Hardcastle Z, Mo R, Hui C, Sharpe PT, The Shh signaling pathway in tooth development:Defects in Gli2 and Gli3 mutants, Development 125:2803-2811, 1998. (Pubitemid 28410205)
4. Lavine KJ, Kovacs A, Ornitz DM, Hedgehog signaling is critical for maintenance ofthe adult coronary vasculature in mice, J Clin Invest 118:2404-2414, 2008. (Pubitemid 351952997)
5. Traiffort E, Angot E, Ruat M, Sonic hedgehog signaling in the mammalian brain,J Neurochem 113:576-590, 2010.
6. Romer J, Curran T, Targeting medulloblastoma: Small-molecule inhibitors of thesonic hedgehog pathway as potential cancer therapeutics, Canc Res 65:4975-4978,2005. (Pubitemid 40827300)
7. Sanchez P, Hernández AM, Stecca B, Kahler AJ, DeGueme AM, Barrett A, BeynaM, Datta MW, Datta S, i Altaba AR, Inhibition of prostate cancer proliferation byinterference with Sonic Hedgehog-Gli1 signaling, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:12561-12566, 2004. (Pubitemid 39122063)
8. Bale AE, Yu K, The hedgehog pathway and basal cell carcinomas, Hum Mol Genet10:757-762, 2001. (Pubitemid 32331585)
9. Zhao C, Chen A, Jamieson CH, Fereshteh M, Abrahamsson A, Blum J, Kwon HY,Kim J, Chute JP, Rizzieri D, Munchhof M, VanArsdaleT, Beachy PA,ReyaT,Hedgehogsignaling is essential for maintenance of cancer stem cells in myeloid leukaemia,Nature 458:776-779, 2009.
10. Jeong J, McMahon AP, Cholesterol modification of hedgehog family proteins, J ClinInvest 110:591-596, 2002. (Pubitemid 34988780)
11. Rubin LL, de Sauvage FJ, Targeting the hedgehog pathway in cancer, Nat Rev DrugDiscov 5:1026-1033, 2006. (Pubitemid 44835129)
12. Dessaud E, McMahon AP, Briscoe J, Pattern formation in the vertebrate neuraltube: A sonic hedgehog morphogen-regulated transcriptional network, Development135:2489-2503, 2008.
13. Bumcrot DA, Takada R, Mcmahon AP, Proteolytic processing yields two secretedforms of sonic hedgehog, Mol Cell Biol 15:2294-2303, 1995.
14. Porter JA, Young KE, Beachy PA, Cholesterol modification of hedgehog signalingproteins in animal development, Science 274:255-259, 1996. (Pubitemid 26353204)
15. Kavran JM, Ward MD, Oladosu OO, Mulepati S, Leahy DJ, All mammalian hedgehogproteins interact with cell adhesion molecule, down-regulated by oncogenes (CDO)and brother of CDO (BOC) in a conserved manner, J Biol Chem 285:24584-24590,2010.
16. Bishop B, Aricescu AR, Harlos K, O'Callaghan CA, Jones EY, Siebold C, Structuralinsights into hedgehog ligand sequestration by the human hedgehog-interactingprotein HHIP, Nat Struct Mol Biol 16:698-703, 2009.
17. Maun HR, Wen X, Lingel A, de Sauvage FJ, Lazarus RA, Scales SJ, Hymowitz SG,Hedgehog pathway antagonist 5E1 binds hedgehog at the pseudo-active site, J BiolChem 285:26570-26580, 2010.
18. Mahindroo N, Punchihewa C, Fujii N, Hedgehog-Gli signaling pathway inhibitors asanticancer agents, J Med Chem 52:3829-3845, 2009.
19. Fuse N, Maiti T, Wang B, Porter JA, Hall TM, Leahy DJ, Beachy PA, Sonic hedgehogprotein signals not as a hydrolytic enzyme but as an apparent ligand for Patched, ProcNatl Acad Sci USA 96:10992-10999, 1999. (Pubitemid 29487317)
20. Peng LF, Stanton BZ, Maloof N, Wang X, Schreiber SL, Syntheses of aminoalcoholderivedmacrocycles leading to a small-molecule binder to and inhibitor of Sonichedgehog, Bioorg Med Chem Lett 19:6319-6325, 2009.
21. Advanced Chemistry Development Inc., ACD/CNMR Predictor, V.3.0. 133, RichmondSt, Suite 605, Toronto, Ontario M5H 2L3, Canada.
22. Smellie A, Teig SL, Towbin P, Poling: Promoting conformational variation, J ComputChem 16:171-187, 1995.
23. Yang S, Pharmacophore modeling and applications in drug discovery: Challenges andrecent advances, Drug Discov Today 15:444-450, 2010.
24. Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ, Experimental and computationalapproaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and developmentsettings, Adv Drug Deliv Rev 23:3-25, 1997. (Pubitemid 27046991)
25. Ekins S, Waller CL, Swaan PW, Cruciani G, Wrighton SA, Wikel JH, Progress inpredicting human ADME parameters in silico, J Pharm Tox Methods 44:251-272,2000. (Pubitemid 32241812)
26. Susnow RG, Dixon SL, Use of robust classification techniques for the prediction ofhuman cytochrome P450 2D6 inhibition, J Chem Inf Comput Sci 43:1308-1315, 2003.
27. Cheng A, Dixon SL, In silico models for the prediction of dose-dependent humanhepatotoxicity, J Comput Aided Mol Des 17:811-823, 2003. (Pubitemid 38519138)
28. Berendsen HJC, van der Spoel D, van Drunen R, GROMACS 4: A message-passingparallel molecular dynamics implementation, Comput Phys Commun 91:43-56, 1995.
29. Hess B, Kutzner C, van der Spoel D, Lindahl E, GROMACS 4: Algorithms for highlyefficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation, J Chem Theory Comput4:435-447, 2008.
30. van Aalten DMF, Bywater R, Findlay JBC, Hendlich M, Hooft RWW, Vriend G,PRODRG, a program for generating molecular topologies and unique moleculardescriptors from coordinates of small molecules, J Comput Aided Mol Des 10:255-262,1996. (Pubitemid 126712820)
31. Hess B, Bekker H, Berendsen HJC, Fraaije JGEM, LINCS: A linear constraint solverfor molecular simulations, J Comput Chem 18:1463-1472, 1997. (Pubitemid 127637344)
32. Tom D, Darrin Y, Lee P, Particle mesh Ewald: An N-log(N) method for Ewald sumsin large systems, J Chem Phys 98:10089-10092, 1993.
33. Bosanac I, Maun HR, Scales SJ, Wen X, Lingel A, Bazan JF, de Sauvage FJ,Hymowitz SG, Lazarus RA, The structure of SHH in complex with HHIP revealsa recognition role for the Shh pseudo active site in signaling, Nat Struct Mol Biol16:691-698, 2009.
34. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliamH, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, HigginsDG, Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0, Bioinformatics 23:2947-2948, 2007.
35. Briscoe J, Chen Y, Jessell TM, Struhl G, A hedgehog-insensitive form of patchedprovides evidence for direct long-range morphogen activity of sonic hedgehog in theneural tube, Mol Cell 7:1279-1291, 2001. (Pubitemid 32607361)
36. Taipale J, Cooper MK, Maiti T, Beachy PA, Patched acts catalytically to suppressthe activity of Smoothened, Nature 418:892-896, 2002.
37. McLellan JS, Zheng X, Hauk G, Ghirlando R, Beachy PA, Leahy DJ, The mode ofhedgehog binding to Ihog homologs is not conserved across different phyla, Nature455:979-983, 2008.
38. Karplus M, McCammon JA, Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules, NatStruct Biol 9:646-788, 2002.