The effectiveness of reinforced feedback in virtual environment in the first 12 months after stroke;Skuteczność terapii w oerodowisku wirtualnym w pierwszych 12 miesiącach po udarze mózgu

Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 436-444

  Kiper, Paweł ^a   Piron, Lamberto ^a   Turolla, Andrea ^a   Stozek, Joanna ^b   Tonin, Paolo ^a  

^a IRCCS SAN CAMILLO HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION   (Poland)

Author keywords

Motor learning; Rehabilitation; Stroke; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM; ARTICLE; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; RANK SUM TEST; REHABILITATION CARE; REINFORCED FEEDBACK IN VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 82855161535     PISSN: 00283843     EISSN: 18974260     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3843(14)60311-X     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Fischer H.C., Stubblefield K., Kline T., et al. Hand rehabilitation following stroke: a pilot study of assisted finger extension training in a virtual environment. Top Stroke Rehabil 2007; 14: 1-12.
2. Placidi G. A smart virtual glove for the hand telerehabilitation. Comput Biol Med 2007; 37: 1100-1107.
3. Piron L., Tonin P., Atzori A.M., et al. The augmented-feedback rehabilitation technique facilitates the arm motor recovery in patients after a recent stroke. Stud Health Technol Inform 2003; 94: 265-267.
4. Piron L., Tonin P., Piccione F., et al. Virtual environment training therapy for arm motor rehabilitation. Presence 2005; 14: 732-740.
5. Kahn L.E., Averbuch M., Rymer W.Z., et al. Comparison of robot-assisted reaching to free reaching in promoting recovery from chronic stroke. In: Integration of Assistive Technology in the Information Age, Proceedings 7th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. IOS Press, Amsterdam 2001, pp. 39-44.
6. Piron L., Tonin P., Iaia V., et al. Feedback rinforzato mediante realtà virtuale in pazienti con deficit motorio post-ictus. Eur Med Phys 2003; 39: 22-23.
7. Sisto S.A., Forrest G.F., Glendinning D. Virtual reality applications for motor rehabilitation after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2002; 8: 11-23.
8. Opara J. Co to jest nowoczesna rehabilitacja poudarowa? Logopeda 2006; 2: 7-18.
9. Eng K., Siekierka E., Pyk P., et al. Interactive visuo-motor therapy system for stroke rehabilitation. Med Bio Eng Comput 2007; 45: 901-907.
10. Adamovich S.V., Merians A.S., Boian R., et al. A virtual reality based exercise system for hand rehabilitation post-stroke: transfer to function. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2004; 7: 4936-4939.
11. Holden M.K., Dyar T.A., Dayan-Cimadoro L. Telerehabilitation using a virtual environment improves upper extremity function in patients with stroke. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2007; 15: 36-42.
12. Sugarman H., Dayan E., Weisel-Eichler A., et al. The Jerusalem telerehabilitation system, a new low-cost, haptic rehabilitation approach. Cyberpsychol Behav 2006; 9: 178-181.
13. Merians A.S., Jack D., Boian R., et al. Virtual reality-augmented rehabilitation for patients following stroke. Phys Ther 2002; 82: 898-915.
14. Piron L., Tonin P., Cortese F., et al. Post-stroke arm motor telerehabilitation web-based. In: Proceedings of IEEE 5th International Workshop on Virtual Rehabilitation. IET (IEEE) Press, New Jersey 2006, pp. 145-148.
15. Piron L., Tonin P., Trivello E., et al. Motor tele-rehabilitation in post-stroke patients. Med Inform Internet Med 2004; 29: 119-125.
16. Piron L., Turolla A., Agostini M., et al. Motor learning principles for rehabilitation: a pilot randomized controlled study in poststroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010; 24: 501-508.
17. Henderson A., Korner-Bitensky N., Levin M. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of its effectiveness for upper limb motor recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil 2007; 14: 52-61.
18. Burgar C.G., Lum P.S., Shor P.C., et al. Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the Palo alto VA/Stanford experience. J Rehab Res Develop 2000; 37: 663-673.
19. Crosbie J.H., Lennon S., Basford J.R., et al. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: still more virtual than real. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29: 1139-1146.
20. Huang V.S., Krakauer J.W. Robotic neurorehabilitation: a compu -tational motor learning perspective. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009; 6: 5.
21. Ward N.S. Neural plasticity and recovery of function. Prog Brain Res 2005; 150: 527-535.
22. Liepert J., Graef S., Uhde I., et al. Training-induced changes of motor cortex representations in stroke patients. Acta Neurol Scand 2000; 101: 321-326.
23. Kwolek A. Rehabilitacja neurologiczna. In: Kwolek A. Rehabili -tacja medyczna. Vol. 2. Wydawnictwo Medyczne Urban & Partner, Wrocław 2003, pp. 10-50.
24. Johansson B.B. Current trends in stroke rehabilitation. A review with focus on brain plasticity. Acta Neurol Scand 2011; 123: 147-159.
25. Hallett M. Functional reorganization after lesions of the human brain: studies with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2001; 157: 822-826.
26. Jang S.H., Ahn S.H., Yang D.S., et al. Cortical reorganization of hand motor function to primary sensory cortex in hemiparetic patients with a primary motor cortex infarct. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 1706-1708.
27. Waldowski K., Seniów J., Bilik M., et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the therapy of selected post-stroke cognitive deficits: aphasia and visuospatial hemineglect. Neurol Neurochir Pol 2009; 43: 460-469.
28. Liepert J., Miltner W.H.R., Bauder H., et al. Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neurosci Lett 1998; 250: 5-8.
29. You S.H., Jang S.H., Kim Y-H., et al. Virtual reality-induced cortical reorganization and associated locomotor recovery in chronic stroke: an experimenter-blind randomized study. Stroke 2005; 36: 1166-1171.
30. Fugl-Meyer A.R., Jaasko L., Leyman I., et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. Scand J Rehab Med 1975; 7: 13-31.
31. Bohannon R.W., Smith M.B. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther 1987; 67: 206-207.
32. Keith R.A., Granger C.V., Hamilton B.B., et al. The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil 1987; 1: 6-18.
33. Sveistrup H. Motor rehabilitation using virtual reality. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2004; 1: 10.
34. Carey J.R., Greer K.R., Grunewald T.K., et al. Primary motor area activation during precision-demanding versus simple finger movement. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2006; 20: 361-370.
35. Schettino L.F., Adamovich S.V., Poizner H. Effects of object shape and visual feedback on hand configuration during grasping. Exp Brain Res 2003; 151: 158-166.
36. Cameirao M.S., Badia S.B., Oller E.D., et al. Neurorehabilitation using the virtual reality based rehabilitation gaming system: methodology, design, psychometrics, usability and validation. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2010; 7: 48.
37. Broeren J., Bjorkdahl A., Claesson L., et al. Virtual rehabilitation after stroke. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008; 136: 77-82.
38. Broeren J., Rydmark M., Sunnerhagen K.S. Virtual reality and haptics as a training device for movement rehabilitation after stroke: a single-case study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1247-1250.
39. Otfinowski J., Jasiak-Tyrkalska B., Starowicz A., et al. Computerbased rehabilitation of cognitive impairments and motor arm function of patients with hemiparesis after stroke. Neurol Neurochir Pol 2006; 40: 112-118.
40. Aisen M.L., Krebs I., Hogan N., et al. The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. Arch Neurol 1997; 54: 443-446.
41. Swanson L.R., Lee T.D. Effects of aging and schedules of knowledge of results on motor learning. J Gerontol 1992; 47: 406-411.
42. Winstein C.J., Merians A.S., Sulivan K.J. Motor learning after unilateral brain damage. Neuropsychologia 1999; 37: 975-987.
43. Deutsch A., Granger C.V., Heinemann A.W., et al. Poststroke rehabilitation: outcomes and reimbursement of inpatient rehabilitation facilities and subacute rehabilitation programs. Stroke 2006; 37: 1477-1482.