The Jerusalem TeleRehabilitation System, a new low-cost, haptic rehabilitation approach

Cyberpsychology and Behavior

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 178-182

  Sugarman, Heidi ^a   Dayan, Ehud ^b   Weisel Eichler, Aviva ^a   Tiran, Joseph ^c  

^a ONO ACADEMIC COLLEGE   (Israel)

^b Hadassah Academic College   (Israel)

^c BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; INTERNET; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; STROKE; TELEREHABILITATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; INTERNET; REHABILITATION; REMOTE CONSULTATION; SOFTWARE; TELEMEDICINE; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOUCH; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 33646731418     PISSN: 10949313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.178     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Butefisch, C., Hummelsheim, H., Denzler, P., et al. (1995). Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 130:59-68.
2. Forster, A., & Young, J. (1996). Specialist nurse support for patients with stroke in the community: a randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal 312:1642-1646.
3. Rosen, M.J. (1999). Telerehabilitation. NeuroRehabilitation 12:11-26.
4. Reinkensmeyer, D.J., Pang, C.T., Nessler, J.A., et al. (2002). Web-based telerehabilitation for the upper extremity after stroke. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 10:102-108.
5. Broeren, J., Rydmark, M., & Sunnerhagen, K.S. (2004). Virtual reality and haptics as a training device for movement rehabilitation after stroke: a single-case study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 85:1247-1250.
6. Krebs, H.I., Ferraro, M., Buerger, S.P., et al. (2004). Rehabilitation robotics: pilot trial of a spatial extension for MIT-Manus. Journal of Rehabilitation Engineering 1:5.
7. th Annual Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference, California State University, Northridge, Los Angeles.
8. Salisbury, J.K., & Srinivasan, M.A. (1992). Virtual environment technology for training (VETT). The Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Research Consortium (VETREC), affiliated with MIT. BBN report no. 7661. Cambridge, MA: VETREC.
9. Burdea, G., Popescu, V., Hentz, V., et al. (2000). Virtual reality-based orthopedic rehabilitation. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 8:430-432.
10. Jadhav, G.G., & Krovi, V. (2004). A low-cost framework for individualized interactive telerehabilitation. Presented at the 26th Annual International Conference in IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS), San Francisco.
11. th International Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality & Associated Technology, Oxford, UK.
12. Sugarman, H., Avni, A., Nathan, R., et al. (2002). Movement in the ipsilesional hand is segmented following unilateral brain damage. Brain and Cognition 48:579-587.
13. Winters, J.M., Harris, G., Schmit, B., et al. (2001). Telerehabilitation research: emerging opportunities. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 4:287-320.