Predator mediated selection and the impact of developmental stage on viability in wood frog tadpoles (Rana sylvatica)

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Calsbeek, Ryan ^a,b   Kuchta, Shawn ^a,c  

^a Dartmouth College   (United States)

^b NATIONAL EVOLUTIONARY SYNTHESIS CENTER   (United States)

^c OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; AGE CLASS; BODY SIZE; DAMSELFLY; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; FROG; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MESOCOSM; METAMORPHOSIS; MORPHOLOGY; MORTALITY RISK; NATURAL SELECTION; NICHE; ONTOGENY; PREDATION RISK; REARING; SURVIVAL; SWIMMING; VIABILITY;

ANAX JUNIUS; ANURA; CERVUS ELAPHUS; RANA SYLVATICA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FROG; GENETIC SELECTION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; LARVA; METAMORPHOSIS; PREDATION; TAIL;

ANIMALS; LARVA; METAMORPHOSIS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; RANIDAE; SELECTION, GENETIC; TAIL;

EID: 82755195842     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-353     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Evolution in organisms that change their niches during the life-cycle. Ebenman B, American Naturalist 1992 139 5 990 1021 10.1086/285370
2. Complex life-cycles. Wilbur HM, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1980 11 67 93 10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.000435
3. Adaptation and constraint in the complex life-cycles of animals. Moran NA, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1994 25 573 600 10.1146/annurev.es.25.110194.003041
4. Ontogenetic habitat shifts in bluegill: The foraging rate-predation risk trade-off. Werner EE, Hall DJ, Ecology 1988 69 1352 1366 10.2307/1941633
5. Larvae in amphibian development and evolution. Hanken J, Hall BK, Wake MH, The origin and evolution of larval forms 1999 61 108
6. Evolution of complex life cycle phenomena- An ecological perspective. Istock CA, Evolution 1967 21 3 592 605 10.2307/2406619
7. Relationship of locomotion to differntial predatin on Pseudacric-tridseriata (Anura Hylidae). Wassersug RJ, Sperry DG, Ecology 1977 58 4 830 839 10.2307/1936218
8. Differential predation on metamorphic anurans by gartner sankes (Thamnophis)- Social behavior as a possible defense. Arnold SJ, Wassersug RJ, Ecology 1978 59 5 1014 1022 10.2307/1938553
9. The consequences of metamorphosis on salamander (Ambystoma) locomotor performance. Shaffer HB, Austin CC, Huey RB, Physiological Zoology 1991 64 1 212 231
10. Genetic correlations among morphometric traits and rates of growth and differentiation in the green tree frog, Hyla cinerea. Blouin MS, Evolution 1992 46 3 735 744 10.2307/2409641
11. Delayed costs of an induced defense in tadpoles? Morphology, hopping, and development rate at metamorphosis. Van Buskirk J, Saxer G, Evolution 2001 55 4 821 829 10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[0821:DCOAID]2.0.CO;2 11392399
12. A quantitative genetic test of adaptive decoupling across metamorphosis for locomotor and life-history traits in the Pacific tree frog, Hyla regilla. Watkins TB, Evolution 2001 55 8 1668 1677 11580026
13. Effects of metamorphosis on the aquatic escape response of the two-lined salamander (Eurycea bislineata). Azizi E, Landberg T, Journal of Experimental Biology 2002 205 6 841 849 11914392
14. Predator-specific changes in the morphology and swimming performance of larval Rana lessonae. Wilson RS, Kraft PG, Van Damme R, Functional Ecology 2005 19 2 238 244 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2005.00958.x
15. Functional morphology of the jaw aparatus of larval and metamorphosing Rana temporaria. Dejongh HJ, Netherlands Journal of Zoology 1968 18 1 1 103
16. Evolution on Adaptive Landscapes. Svensson EI, Calsbeek R, (eds.), Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press 2012
17. A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Gosner KL, Herpetologiea 1960 16 183 190
18. Tadpoles: The biology of anuran larvae. McDiarmid RW, Altig R, Tadpoles: The biology of anuran larvae 1999 xiv 1-444
19. Locomotion in amphibian larvae (or why aren't tadpoles built like fishes). Wassersug RJ, American Zoologist 1989 29 1 65 84
20. Sprint velocity of tadpoles (Bufo boreas) through metamorphosis. Huey RB, Copeia 1980 3 537 540
21. The implications of shape and metamorphosis for drag forces on a generalized pond tadpole (Rana catesbeiana). Dudley R, King VA, Wassersug RJ, Copeia 1991 1 252 257
22. Selection for phenotypic plasticity in Rana sylvatica tadpoles. Van Buskirk J, Relyea RA, Biol J Linn Soc 1998 65 3 301 328
23. Natural selection for environmentally induced phenotypes in tadpoles. Van Buskirk J, McCollum SA, Werner EE, Evolution 1997 51 1983 1992 10.2307/2411018
24. Influence of tail shape on tadpole swimming performance. Van Buskirk J, McCollum SA, Journal of Experimental Biology 2000 203 14 2149 2158 10862727
25. Form, function, and fitness: Pathways to survival. Johnson JB, Burt DB, DeWitt TJ, Evolution 2008 62 5 1243 1251 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00343.x 18266988
26. Escape behaviour and ultimate causes of specific induced defences in an anuran tadpole. Teplitsky c, Plenet S, Lena JP, Mermet N, Malet E, Joly P, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2005 18 180 190 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00790.x 15669975
27. Disruptive selection- a tail color polymorphoism in Acris tadpoles in response to differential predation. Caldwell JP, Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne De Zoologie 1982 60 11 2818 2827 10.1139/z82-361
28. The lure effect, tadpole tail shape, and the target of dragonfly strikes. Van Buskirk J, Anderwald P, Lupold S, Reinhardt L, Schuler H, Journal of Herpetology 2003 37 2 420 424 10.1670/0022-1511(2003)037[0420:TLETTS]2.0.CO;2
29. Bold tail coloration protects tadpoles from dragonfly strikes. Van Buskirk J, Aschwanden J, Buckelmuller I, Reolon S, Ruttiman S, Copeia 2004 3 599 602
30. Tadpole body zones differ with regard to strike frequencies and kill rates by dragonfly naiads. Johnson KE, Eidietis L, Copeia 2005 4 909 913
31. Aquatic mesocosms. Semlitsch RD, Boone MD, Dodd CK Jr, Amphibian ecology and conservation: a handbook of techniques [Techniques in Ecology & Conservation Series] 2010 87 104
32. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Lande R, Arnold SJ, Evolution 1983 37 1210 1226 10.2307/2408842
33. Visualizing and quantifying natural selection. Brodie EDI, Moore AJ, Janzen FJ, Trends Ecol Evol 1995 10 8 313 318 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89117-X 21237054
34. Factor-Analysis and Aic. Akaike H, Psychometrika 1987 52 3 317 332 10.1007/BF02294359
35. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretical approach. Burnham KP, Anderson DR, 2002
36. Visualizing Multivariate Selection. Phillips PC, Arnold SJ, Evolution 1989 43 6 1209 1222 10.2307/2409357
37. Estimating nonlinear selection gradients using quadratic regression coefficients: Double or nothing? Stinchcombe JR, Agrawal AF, Hohenlohe PA, Arnold SJ, Blows MW, Evolution 2008 62 9 2435 2440 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008. 00449.x 18616573
38. Regression analysis of natural selection: statistical and biological interpretation. Mitchell-Olds T, Shaw RG, Evolution 1987 41 1149 1161 10.2307/2409084
39. On the assignment of fitness values in statistical analyses of selection. Brodie ED III, Janzen FJ, Evolution 1996 50 437 442 10.2307/2410813
40. Logistic regression for empirical studies of multivariate selection. Janzen FJ, Stern HS, Evolution 1998 52 6 1564 1571 10.2307/2411330
41. Effects of natural and sexual selection on adaptive population divergence and premating isolation in a damselfly. Svensson EI, Eroukhmanoff F, Friberg M, Evolution 2006 60 6 1242 1253 16892974
42. Correlational Selection for Color Pattern and Antipredator Behavior in the Garter Snake Thamnophis ordinoides. Brodie ED, Evolution 1992 46 5 1284 1298 10.2307/2409937
43. Inferring multiple causality: The limitations of path analysis. Petraitis PS, Dunham AE, Niewiarowski PH, Functional Ecology 1996 10 421-431
44. Exploring fitness surfaces. Schluter D, Nychka D, Amer Nat 1994 143 4 597 616 10.1086/285622
45. The method of path coefficients. Wright S, Ann Math Stats 1934 5 161 215 10.1214/aoms/1177732676
46. Path Analysis-a primer. Li CC, Pacific Grove, California: Boxwood Press 1975
47. Ecological morphology of locomotor performance in squamate reptiles. Garland T Jr, Losos JB, Ecological Morphology: Integrative Organismal Biology Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Wainwright PC, Reilly SM, 1994
48. Spatial variation in the selective scenarios of Hormatophylla spinosa (Cruciferae). Gomez JM, Zamora R, American Naturalist 2000 155 630 648
49. Amos 18 User's Guide. Arbuckle JL, Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc. 2009
50. Natural selection on Erysimum mediohispanicum flower shape: insights into the evolution of zygomorphy. Gomez JM, Perfectti F, Camacho JPM, American Naturalist 2006 168 531 545 10.1086/507048 17004224
51. An information-theoretic approach to phylogeography. Carstens BC, Stoute HN, Reid NM, Molecular Ecology 2009 18 4270 4282 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04327. x 19765225
52. Using multivariate statistics. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS, New York, NY: Harper Collins College 3 1996
53. AMOS-Analysis of Moment Structures. Arbuckle JL, Psychometrika 1994 59 1 135 137 10.1007/BF02294272
54. Bayesian Data Analysis. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB, Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC 2 2004
55. Body shape, burst speed and escape behavior of larval anurans. Dayton GH, Saenz D, Baum KA, Langerhans RB, DeWitt TJ, Oikos 2005 111 3 582 591 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2005.14340.x
56. The kinematics of swimming in anuran larvae. Wassersug RJ, Hoff K, Journal of Experimental Biology 1985 119 1 30
57. A computational fluid dynamics study of tadpole swimming. Liu H, Wassersug RJ, Kawachi K, Journal of Experimental Biology 1996 199 6 1245 1260 9319105
58. Natural variation in morphology of larval amphibians: Phenotypic plasticity in nature? Van Buskirk J, Ecological Monographs 2009 79 4 681 705 10.1890/08-1692.1
59. Functional mechanisms of an inducible defence in tadpoles: morphology and behaviour influence mortality risk from predation. Van Buskirk J, McCollum SA, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2000 13 2 336 347 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2000. 00173.x
60. The many faces of predation: How induction, selection, and thinning combine to alter prey phenotypes. Relyea RA, Ecology 2002 83 7 1953 1964 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1953:TMFOPH]2.0.CO;2
61. Fine-tuned phenotypes: Tadpole plasticity under 16 combinations of predators and competitors. Relyea RA, Ecology 2004 85 1 172 179 10.1890/03-0169
62. Morphology, performance and fitness. Arnold SJ, Am Zool 1983 23 347 361
63. Ecological Morphology: Integrative Organismal Biology. Wainwright PC, Reilly SM, Chicago, ILL: University of Chicago Press 1999
64. Feeding: Form, Function, and Evolution in Tetrapod Vertebrates. Schwenk K, San Diego, CA: Academic Press 2000
65. Ecological consequences of tail injury in Rana tadpoles. Wilbur HM, Semlitsch RD, Copeia 1990 1 18 24
66. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Kingsolver JGH, Hoekstra HE, Hoekstra JM, Berrigan D, Vignieri SN, Hill CE, Hoang A, Gilbert P, Beerli P, Am Nat 2001 157 245 261 10.1086/319193 18707288
67. Comparing strengths of directional selection: how strong is strong? Hereford J, Hansen TF, Houle D, Evolution 2004 58 2133 2143 15562680
68. It's about time: the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection in the wild. Siepielski AM, DiBattista JD, Carlson SM, Ecology Letters 2009 12 11 1261 1276 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01381.x 19740111
69. Variation in the degree and costs of adaptive phenotypic plasticity among Rana temporaria populations. Merila J, Laurila A, Lindgren B, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2004 17 5 1132 1140 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00744.x 15312085
70. Patterns of natural selection on size at metamorphosis in water frogs. Altwegg R, Reyer HU, Evolution 2003 57 4 872 882 12778556