Collaboration patterns in patent networks and their relationship with the transfer of technology: The case study of the CSIC patents

Scientometrics

Volumn 87, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 657-666

  Ortega, José Luis ^a  

^a CSIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

Collaboration pattern; Multiple regression model; Patent licensing; Research areas; Scientometrics

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955468579     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0363-4     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Agrawal, A. (2000). Importing scientific inventions: Direct interaction, geography and economic performance. Mimeo, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
2. Balconi, M., Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2004). Networks of inventors and the role of academia: An exploration of Italian patent data. Research Policy, 33, 127-145.
3. Boccardelli, P., Leone, M. I., Magnusson, M., & Reichstein, T. (2010). Fuel on the invention funnel: Technology licensing-in, antecedents and invention. [working paper]. Aalborg: DRUID. http://www3. druid. dk/wp/20100013. pdf.
4. Bordons, M., & Gomez, I. (2000). Collaboration networks in science. In B. Cronin & H. B. Atkins (Eds.), The web of knowledge: A festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield. NJ: Information Today.
5. Boyack, K. W., Klavans, R., & Börner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351-374.
6. CSIC. (2006). Plan de Actuación 2006-2009. Madrid: CSIC.
7. Dunn, O. J. (1961). Multiple comparisons among means. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56, 54-64.
8. Frame, J. D., & Carpenter, M. P. (1979). International research collaboration. Social Studies of Science, 9(4), 481-497.
9. Godoe, H. (2000). Innovation regimes, R& D and radical innovations in telecommunications. Research Policy, 29, 1033-1046.
10. Goktepe, D. (2006). Identification of university inventors and university patenting patterns at Lund University: Conceptual, methodological & empirical findings. Copenhagen, Denmark: DRUID winter conference. http://mpra. ub. uni-muenchen. de/1628/1/MPRA_paper_1628. pdf.
11. Hagstrom, W. O. (1965). The scientific community. New York: Basic Books.
12. Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82-111.
13. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18.
14. Kruskall, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47(260), 583-621.
15. Lee, Y. G. (2009). What affects a patent's value? An analysis of variables that affect technological, direct economic and indirect economic value: An exploratory conceptual approach. Scientometrics, 79(3), 623-633.
16. Lissoni, F., Llerena, P., McKelvey, M., & Sanditov, B. (2008). Academic patenting in Europe: New evidence from the KEINS database. Research Evaluation, 17(2), 87-102.
17. Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. (2008) Guest authors or ghost inventors? Inventorship attribution in academic patents. The 25th DRUID celebration conference 2008 on entrepreneurship and innovation, Copenhagen, Denmark. http://www. econ. kuleuven. be/msi/_docs/workshops/2008-04-24. pdf.
18. Lowe, R. A. (2002). Entrepreneurship and information asymmetry: Theory and evidence from the University of California. Working paper. 11/25/02, http://littlehurt. tepper. cmu. edu/gsiadoc/wp/2003-09. pdf.
19. McCarthy, J. T., Schecter, R. E., & Franklyn, D. J. (2004). McCarthy's desk encyclopedia of intellectual property (3rd ed.). Washington: The Bureau of National Affairs.
20. Meyer, M., & Bhattacharya, S. (2004). Commonalities and differences between scholarly and technical collaboration: An exploration of co-invention and co-authorship analyses. Scientometrics, 61(3), 443-456.
21. Mowery, D. C., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2001). The geographic reach of market and non-market channels of technology transfer: Comparing citations and licenses of university patents. NBER working paper series, w8568. http://dimetic. dime-eu. org/dimetic_files/MoweryZiedonis2004%20University%20Licenses%201. pdf.
22. o Programa Marco. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 33(2), 287-297.
23. Powell, W. W., & Grodal, S. (2004). Networks of innovations. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: University Press.
24. Price, D. J. de S. (1986). Little science, big science and beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.
25. Sapsalis, E. (2007). From science to license: An exploratory analysis of the value of academic patents, working papers CEB 07-018. RS, Universite Libre de Bruxelles. https://dipot. ulb. ac. be: 8443/dspace/bitstream/2013/53932/1/RePEc_sol_wpaper_07-018. pdf.
26. Vinding, A. L. (2002). Interorganizational diffusion and transformation of knowledge in the process of product innovation, Ph. D. thesis. Denmark: Aalborg University http://www. business. aau. dk/~alv/Vinding-Dissertation. pdf.
27. Yoshikane, F. (2006). Comparative analysis of co-authorship networks considering authors' roles in collaboration: Differences between the theoretical and application areas. Scientometrics, 68(3), 643-655.