Synergy or separation mode: The relationship between the academic research and the knowledge-transfer activities of Korean academics

Scientometrics

Volumn 90, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 177-200

  Kwon, Ki Seok ^a   Martin, Ben R ^b,c,d  

^a Kyungil University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Knowledge transfer; South Korea; Synergy and separation modes; Third mission; Universities

Indexed keywords

EID: 82655181803     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0513-8     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Agrawal, A., & Henderson, R. (2002). Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science, 48(1), 44-60.
2. Albuquerque, E. M. (2001). Scientific infrastructure and catching-up process: Notes about a relationship illustrated by science and technology statistics. Revista Brasileira de Economia, 55(4), 545-566.
3. Azoulay, P., Ding, W., & Stuart, T. (2006). The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality, and direction of (public) research. NBER working paper 11917.
4. Blume, S. (1987). The theoretical significance of cooperative research. In S. Blume, J. Bunders, L. Leydesdorff, & R. Whitley (Eds.), The social direction of the public sciences: Sociology of the sciences yearbook XI (pp. 3-38). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
5. Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E. G., Causino, N., & Louis, K. S. (1996). Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. New England Journal of Medicine, 335, 1734-1739.
6. Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. (2004). Open science and university patenting: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian case. Paper presented at the 10th International J. S. Schumpeter Society Conference on Innovation, Industrial Dynamics and Structural Transformation Schumpeterian Legacies, Milan, 9-12 June 2004.
7. Calderini, M., Franzoni, C., & Vezzulli, A. (2007). If star scientists do not patent: The effect of productivity, basicness and impact on the decision to patent in the academic world. Research Policy, 36, 303-319.
8. Choung, J.-Y., & Hwang, H.-Y. (2000). National systems of innovation: Institutional linkages and performances in the case of Korea and Taiwan. Scientometrics, 48(3), 413-426.
9. Choung, J.-Y., Min, H.-G., & Park, M.-C. (2003). Patterns of knowledge production: The case of information and telecommunication sector in Korea. Scientometrics, 58(1), 115-128.
10. Dasgupta, P., & David, P. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23(5), 487-521.
11. David, P. A. (2002). The political economy of public science. In H. Lawton Smith (Ed.), The regulation of science and technology (pp. 33-57). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
12. Eom, B., & Lee, K. (2010). Determinants of industry-academy linkages and their impact on firm performance: The case of Korea as a latecomer in knowledge industrialization. Research Policy, 39, 625-639.
13. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (Eds.). (1997). Universities in the global economy: A triple helix of university-industry-government relations. London: Cassell Academic.
14. Geuna, A. (1999). The economics of knowledge production: Funding and the structure of university research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
15. Geuna, A. (2001). The changing rationale for European university research funding: Are there negative unintended consequences? Journal of Economic Issues, 35, 607-632.
16. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge. London: Sage.
17. Godin, B., & Gingras, Y. (2000). Impact of collaborative research on academic science. Science and Public Policy, 27(1), 65-73.
18. Gulbrandsen, M., & Smeby, J. C. (2005). Industry funding and university professors' research performance. Research Policy, 34, 932-950.
19. Hess, David. J. (1997). Science studies: An advanced introduction. New York: New York University Press.
20. Hicks, D., & Hamilton, K. (1999). Does university-industry collaboration adversely affect university research? Issues in science and technology, 15 (Summer 1999), 74-75.
21. Kwon, K.-S. (2009a). Research and knowledge-transfer activities of different types of Korean universities. Paper presented at the 6th Asialics conference, Hong Kong, 6-7 July 2009.
22. Kwon, K.-S. (2009b). Emergence of research and entrepreneurial activities of Korean universities. Paper presented at the conference on university-industry linkages and economic performance. College of Social Sciences, Seoul National University, 27 February 2009.
23. Kwon, K.-S. (2011). The co-evolution of universities' academic research and knowledge-transfer activities of universities in a catch-up country: The case of South Korea. Science and Public Policy, 38(6), 493-503.
24. Lattimore, R., & Revesz, J. (1996). Australian science: Performance from published papers, bureau of industry economics, report 96/3. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Office.
25. Louis, K. S., Blumenthal, D., Gluck, M. E., & Stoto, M. A. (1989). Entrepreneurs in academe: An exploration of behaviors among life scientists. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(1), 110-131.
26. Markiewicz, K. R., & Di Minin, A. (2004). Commercializing the laboratory: The relationship between faculty patenting and publishing. Haas School of Business Working Paper.
27. Mazzoleni, R. (2003). The role of universities and public research in the catching-up process. Paper presented at the first International Globelics Conference on Innovation Systems and Development Strategies for the Third Millennium. Rio de Janeiro, 2-6 November 2003.
28. Merton, R. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. Meyer, M. (2006). Are patenting scientists the better scholars? An exploratory comparison of inventor-authors with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology. Research Policy, 35(10), 1646-1662.
30. Murray, F., & Graham, L. (2007). Buying science and selling science: Gender differences in the market for commercial science. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 657-689.
31. Nelson, R. R. (2004). The market economy and the scientific commons. Research Policy, 33(3), 455-471.
32. Oh, Y. J., Kwon, K.-S., & Lee, K. (2009). Research performance of university professors in Korea: A weak point of the national innovation system in Korea? Paper presented at the conference on university-industry linkages and economic performance. Seoul National University, Seoul, 27 February 2009.
33. Owen-Smith, J. (2003). From separate systems to a hybrid order: Accumulative advantage across public and private science at research one universities. Research Policy, 32(6), 1081-1104.
34. Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2003). The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: Assessing the importance of experience and connectivity. Research Policy, 32(9), 1695-1711.
35. Park, H. W., Hong, H. D., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). A comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and the Netherlands using triple helix indicators. Scientometrics, 65(1), 3-27.
36. Pavitt, K. (1998). The social shaping of the national science base. Research Policy, 27, 793-805.
37. Pavitt, K. (2001). Public policies to support basic research: What can the rest of the world learn from US theory and practice? (And what they should not learn?). Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(3), 761-779.
38. Rahm, D. (1994). University-firm linkages for industrial innovation. Stanford: Center for Economic Policy Research, Stanford University.
39. Ranga, L. M., Debackere, K., & von Tunzelmann, N. (2003). Entrepreneurial universities and the dynamics of academic knowledge production: A case study of basic vs. applied research in Belgium. Scientometrics, 58(2), 301-320.
40. Seung, J., & Kim, W. (2010). Post catch-up innovation and development of creative talent in Korea: Limitations and challenges. STI Policy Review, 1(3), 39-51.
41. Song, W., & Hwang, H.-R. (2006). The technological innovation patterns of component suppliers in the post catching-up period: The case study of component suppliers in mobile phone industry. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 9(3), 435-450.
42. MOST. (2007). Report on the survey of research and development in science and technology. Seoul: Korean Ministry of Science and Technology.
43. Stephan, P. E. (1996). The economics of science. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 1199-1235.
44. Stephan, P. E., Gurmu, S., Sumell, A. J., & Black, G. (2007). Who's patenting in the university? Evidence from the survey of doctorate recipients. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(2), 71-99.
45. Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
46. van Looy, B., Ranga, M., Callaert, J., Debackere, K., & Zimmermann, E. (2004). Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: Towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? Research Policy, 33(3), 425-441.
47. van Looy, B., Debackere, K., Callaert, J., Tijssen, R., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Scientific capabilities and technological performance of national innovation system: An exploration of emerging industrial relevant domains. Scientometrics, 66(2), 295-310.
48. van Looy, B., Magerman, T., & Debackere, K. (2007). Developing technology in the vicinity of science: An examination of the relationship between science intensity (of patents) and technological productivity within the field of biotechnology. Scientometrics, 70(2), 441-458.