Scientific capabilities and technological performance of national innovation systems: An exploration of emerging industrial relevant research domains

Scientometrics

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 295-310

  Van Looy, Bart ^a,b   Debackere, Koenraad ^a,b   Callaert, Julie ^b   Tijssen, Robert ^c   Van Leeuwen, Thed ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b Katholieke Universiteit Leuven   (Belgium)

^c CWTS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 30844457508     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-006-0030-3     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. ANSELIN, L., VARGA, A., Acs, Z. (1997), Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations, Journal of Urban Economics, 42 : 422-448.
2. BLIND, K., GRUPP, H. (1999), Interdependences between the science and technology infrastructure and innovation activities in German regions: Empirical findings and policy consequences, Research Policy, 28 : 451-468.
3. CALLAERT, J., VAN LOOY, B., VERBEEK, A., DEBACKERE, K., THUS, B. (Forthcoming), Traces of prior art: An analysis of non-patent references found in patents, Scientometrics, forthcoming.
4. DAVID, P. A., FORAY, D., STEINMUELLER, W. E. (1997), The research network and the new economics of science: From metaphors to organizational behaviour, In: GAMBARDELLA, A., MALERBA, F. (Eds), The Organisation of Innovative Activities in Europe, Cambridge University Press.
5. ETZKOWITZ, H., LEYDESDORFF, L. (1998), The endless transition: A 'triple helix' of university-industry-government relations, Minerva, 36 : 203-208.
6. FISCHER, M. M., VARGA, A. (2003), Spatial knowledge spillovers and university research: Evidence from Austria, Annals of Regional Science, 37 : 303-322.
7. FREEMAN, C. (1987), Technology and Economic. Performance: Lessons from Japan, Pinter, London.
8. HARHOFF, D., SCHERER, F. M., VOPEL, K. (2003), Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights, Research Policy, 32 : 1343-1363.
9. JOHNSON, W. H. A., JOHNSTON, D. A. (2004), Organisational knowledge creating processes and the performance of university-industry collaborative R&D projects, International Journal of Technology Management, 27 : 93-114.
10. LEYDESDORFF, L., ETZKOWITZ, H. (1996), Emergence of a triple helix of university-industry-government relations, Science and Public Policy, 23 : 279-286.
11. LUNDVALL, B-Å. (Ed.) (1992), National Innovation Systems: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Pinter, London.
12. MEYER, M. (2000a), Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature, Research Policy, 29 : 409-434.
13. MEYER, M. (2000b), Patent citations in a novel field of technology - What can they tell about interactions between emerging communities of science and technology? Scientometrics, 48 : 151-178.
14. MEYER, M., SINILAINEN, T., UTECHT, J. T. (2003), Towards hybrid Triple Helix indicators: A study of university-related patents and a survey of academic inventors, Scientometrics, 58 : 321-350.
15. MICHEL, J., BETTELS, B. (2001), Patent citation analysis: A closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports, Scientometrics, 51 : 185-201.
16. MONJON, S., WAELBROECK, P. (2003), Assessing spillovers from universities to firms: Evidence from French firm-level data, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21 : 1255-1270.
17. NARIN, F., HAMILTON, K. S., OLIVASTRO, D. (1997), The increasing linkage between US technology and science, Research Policy, 26 : 317-330.
18. National Innovation Systems, OECD Publications, 1997, Paris Cedex 16, France.
19. NELSON, R. (Ed.) (1993), National Innovation Systems. A Comparative Analysis, Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford.
20. NIOSI, J., BAS, T. G. (2001), The competencies of regions - Canada's clusters in biotechnology, Small Business Economics, 17 : 31-42.
21. PATEL, P., PAVITT, K. (1994), The Nature and Economic Importance of National Innovation Systems, STI Review, No. 14, OECD, Paris.
22. PAVITT, K. (1997), Do Patents Reflect the Useful Research Output of Universities? SPRU Electronic Working Papers Series, 6, November 1997.
23. PORTER, M. (1995), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, The Free Press, New York.
24. REITZIG, M. (2004), Improving patent valuations for management purposes - validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales, Research Policy, 33 : 939-957.
25. SCHMOCH, U. (1997), Indicators and the relations between Science and Technology, Scientometrics, 38 : 103-116.
26. STEINMUELLER, W. E. (1994), Basic research and industrial innovation, In: DODGSON, M., ROTHWELL, R. (Eds), The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Edward Elgar, Aldershot, pp. 54-66.
27. TIJSSEN, R. J. W., BUTER, R. K., VAN LEEUWEN, TH. N. (2000), Technological relevance of science: validation and analysis of citation linkages between patents and research papers, Scientometrics, 47 : 389-412.
28. TIJSSEN, R. J. W. (2001), Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows, Research Policy, 30 : 35-54.
29. TIJSSEN, R. J. W. (2002), Science dependence of technologies: Evidence from inventors and their inventions, Research Policy, 31 : 509-526.
30. TIJSSEN, R. J. W. (2004), Is the commercialisation of scientific research affecting the production of public knowledge? Global trends in the output of corporate research articles, Research Policy, 33 : 709-733.
31. VAN LOOY, B., ZIMMERMANN, E., VEUGELERS, R., VERBEEK, A., MELLO, J., DEBACKERE, K. (2003), Do science-technology interactions pay off when developing technology? An exploratory investigation of 10 science-intensive technology domains, Scientometrics, 57 : 355-367.
32. VAN LOOY, B., CALLAERT, J., VERBEEK, A., DEBACKERE, K. (2003), Patent related indicators for assessing knowledge generating institutions: Towards a contextualised approach, Journal of Technology Transfer, 28 : 53-61.
33. VAN LOOY B., MAGERMAN T., DEBACKERE, K. (forthcoming), Developing Technology in the Vicinity of Science. An Examination of the Relationship between Science Intensity (of Patents) and Technological Productivity within the Field of Biotechnology, DTEW Working Paper.
34. VARGA, A. (1998), University Research and Regional Innovation, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
35. VERBEEK, A., DEBACKERE, K., LUWEL, M., ANDRIES, P., ZIMMERMANN, E., DELEUS, F. (2002), Linking Science to technology: Using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes, Scientometrics, 54 : 399-420.