Indeterminacy and variability in meta-ethics

Philosophical Studies

Volumn 145, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 215-234

  Gill, Michael B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

David Brink; Externalism; Internalism; Meta ethics; Michael Smith; R.M. Hare

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349499648     PISSN: 00318116     EISSN: 15730883     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11098-008-9220-6     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Brink, D. O. (1989). Moral realism and the foundations of ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Cokely, E., & Feltz, A. (forthcoming). The diversity of folk and folk judgments.
3. Doris, J., & Stich, S. (2005). As a matter of fact: Empirical perspectives of ethics. In F. Jackson & M. Smith (Eds.), The oxford handbook of contemporary philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Gill, M. B. (1999). Relativism and the concept of morality. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 33, 171-182.
5. Gill, M. B. (2008). Metaethical variability, incoherence, and error. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology: The cognitive science of morality (Vol. 2, pp. 387-401). Cambridge: MIT Press.
6. Goodwin, G., & Darley, J. (2008). The psychology of meta-ethics: Exploring objectivism. Cognition, 106, 1339-1366.
7. Hare, R. M. (1964). The language of morals. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Horgan, T., & Timmons, M. (2002). Conceptual relativity and metaphysical realism. Philosophical Issues, 12, 219-250.
9. Knobe, J. (2003). Intentional action in folk psychology: An experimental investigation. Philosophical Psychology, 16, 309-324.
10. Lewis, D. (1999). Reduction of mind. In Papers in metaphysics and epistemology (pp. 291-324). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Lewis, D. (2000). Dispositional theories of value. In Papers in ethics and social philosophy (pp. 68-94). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Loeb, D. (2008). Moral incoherentism: How to pull a metaphysical rabbit out of a semantic hat. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology: The cognitive science of morality (Vol. 2, pp. 355-385). Cambridge: MIT Press.
13. Mackie, J. L. (1977). Ethics: Inventing right and wrong. New York: Penguin.
14. Nichols, S. (2004). Sentimental rules: On the natural foundations of moral judgment. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Nichols, S., & Ulatowski, J. (2007). Intuitions and individual differences: The Knobe effect revisited. Mind and Language, 22, 346-365.
16. Putnam, H. (1988). Representation and reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (Forthcoming). Mixed-up meta-ethics.
19. Smith, M. (1994). The moral problem. Oxford UK: Blackwell.
20. Stich, S., & Weinberg, J. M. (2002). Jackson's empirical assumptions. Phenomenology and Philosophical Research, 62, 637-643.