Goal interference, perceived consensus, and preferences for conflict-resolution strategies

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 834-850

  Whitney, Carolyn ^a   Miller, Carol T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035999313     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00244.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Social psychological explanations for the persistence of a conflict between paddling canoeists and motorcraft users in the Boundary Waters Canoe area
2. The ROS planning system: Evolution, basic concepts, and research needed
3. Toward a behavioral theory of crowding in outdoor recreation: An evaluation and synthesis of research
4. Exploring the role of tolerance in recreational conflict
5. Outdoor recreation participation and attitudes to the environment
6. Perceived conflict between urban cross-country skiers and snowmobilers in Alberta
7. A study of conflict in recreational land use: Snowmobiling vs. Ski-touring
8. When the wilderness gets crowded... ?
9. Wilderness perception and use: The example of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area
10. Ten years of research on the false consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review
11. Majority and minority perceptions of consensus and recommendations for resolving conflicts about land use regulation
12. The false consensus effect: A recta-analysis of 115 hypothesis tests
13. Availability and social projection: The effects of sequence of measurement and wording of question on estimates of consensus
14. The "false consensus effect": An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes
15. Accuracy in perceptions of consensus: Differential tendencies of people with majority and minority positions
16. Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomena
17. Effects of social context on consensus and majority vote decision making
18. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
19. Attitude extremity, consensus, and diagnosticity