Critical agency, resistance and a post-colonial civil society

Cooperation and Conflict

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 419-440

  Richmond, Oliver P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

agency; civil society; critique; IR; post colonial

Indexed keywords

EID: 82555173039     PISSN: 00108367     EISSN: 14603691     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0010836711422416     Document Type: Article

References (114)

1. Acharya A,Buzan B.Why is there no non-Western international relations theory? An introduction.International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. 2007;7:287-312.
2. Agamben G,Badiou A,Bensaid D,Brown W,Nancy J-L,Ranciere J,Ross K,Zizek SDemocracy in What State. New York: Columbia University Press; 2009:.
3. Agathangelou A,Ling LHM.The House of IR.International Studies Review. 2004;6 (4): 21-50.
4. Anderson BImagined Communities: Reflections of the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1991:.
5. Appadurai AModernity at Large. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press; 1996:.
6. Arditi BPolitics on the Edges of Liberalism: Difference, Populism, Revolution, Agitation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 2007:.
7. Aron DPeace and War: A Theory of International Relations. London: Transaction; 2003 [1966]:.
8. Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter. Asad T, ed. New York: Humanity Books; 1973:.
9. Writing Past Colonialism: On Post-Colonial Futures. Ashcroft B, ed. London: Continuum; 2001:.
10. Ashley R.Political realism and human interest.International Studies Quarterly. 1985;25:204-36.
11. Barker RSPolitical Legitimacy and the State. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1990:.
12. Baudrillard JIn the Shadow of the Silent Majorities. New York: Semiotext(e); 1983:.
13. Beitz CRPolitical Theory and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1979:.
14. Bhabha HThe Location of Culture. London: Routledge; 1994:.
15. Bilgin P.Thinking past 'Western' IR?.Third World Quarterly. 2008;29 (1): 5-23.
16. Blaney DL,Inayatullah N.Neo-modernisation: IR and the inner life of modernisation theory.European Journal of International Relations. 2002;8 (1): 103-37.
17. BoegeVBrownMAClementsKPNolanA (2008) States emerging from hybrid political orders-Pacific experiences. Australian Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies (ACPACS) Occasional Papers Series.
18. Critical Security Studies and World Politics. Booth K, ed. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner; 2005:.
19. Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics. Butterfield HWight M, ed. London: Allen and Unwin; 1966:.
20. Cabral AUnity and Struggle. London: Heinemann; 1979:.
21. Caplan R.International authority and state building: The case of Bosnia and Herzegovina.Global Governance. 2004;10:53-65.
22. Chakrabarty DProvincialising Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2000:.
23. Chandler DBosnia: Faking Democracy after Dayton. London: Pluto Press; 1999:.
24. Cooper N.Review Article: On the crisis of the liberal peace.Conflict, Security and Development. 2007;7 (4): 605-16.
25. Cox R.'Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations theory.Millennium. 1981;10 (2): 126-55.
26. De Certeau MThe Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley, CA: California University Press; 1984:.
27. International Theory: Critical Investigations. Der Derian J, ed. New York: New York University Press; 1994:.
28. Doyle M.Kant, liberal legacies, and foreign affairs.Philosophy and Public Affairs. 1983;12 (3): 205-35.
29. Doyle MWays of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism, and Socialism. New York: WW Norton; 1997:.
30. Doyle M,Sambanis NMaking War and Building Peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2006:.
31. Duffield MGlobal Governance and the New Wars. London: Zed Books; 2001:.
32. Duffield MDevelopment, Security and Unending War. London: Polity; 2007:.
33. Critical Theories, International Relations and the 'Anti-Globalisation Movement': The Politics of Global Resistance. Eschle CMaiguashca B, ed. London: Routledge; 2005:.
34. Foucault MDiscipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books; 1979:.
35. Foucault MPower/Knowledge. New York: Pantheon; 1980:.
36. Foucault M. The subject and power. Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Dreyfus HLRabinow P, ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1983:208-26.
37. Foucault MThe History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: The Will to Knowledge. London: Penguin; 1984 [1976]:.
38. Foucault MThe Politics of Truth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1997:.
39. Foucault MReligion and Culture. Carette Jeremy, ed. London: Routledge; 1999:.
40. Foucault MSecurity, Territory Population. London: Palgrave; 2004:.
41. Foucault MThe Birth of Politics. London: Palgrave; 2009:.
42. Freire PPedagogy of the Oppressed. London: Penguin; 1996 [1970]:.
43. Gill SPower and Resistance in the New World Order. London and New York: Palgrave; 2003:.
44. Habermas JThe Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1987:.
45. Harvey DExplanation in Geography. New York: St Martin's Press; 1969:.
46. Harvey DSocial Justice and the City. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1973:.
47. Harvey DJustice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 1996:.
48. Harvey DA Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005:.
49. Hayward AR,Biersteker TJ.The dialectics of World Order: Notes for a future archaeologist of international Savoir Faire.International Studies Quarterly. 1984;28 (2):.
50. Held DIntroduction to Critical Theory. London: Hutchinson; 1980:.
51. Hindess B.Political theory and actually existing liberalism.Critical Reviews in International Social and Political Philosophy. 2008;11 (3): 347-52.
52. Hobson JM.Is critical theory always for the white West and for Western imperialism?.Review of International Studies. 2007;33 (S1): 91-116.
53. Hollis M,Smith SExplaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1990:.
54. Ikenberry JG.Liberal Internationalism 3.0.Perspectives on Politics. 2009;7:71-87.
55. Inayatullah N,Blaney D. Knowing encounters: Beyond parochialism in international relations theory. The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory. Lapid YKratochwil F, ed. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner; 1996:65-84.
56. Responsibility to Protect. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre; 2001:.
57. Jahn B.The tragedy of liberal diplomacy: Democratization, intervention and statebuilding (Part II).Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding. 2007;1 (2): 211-29.
58. JohnsonP (2010) Local vs. National Peacebuilding: The Richness of Somali Peacemaking. Available at: www.prio.no/peaceethics/PeacE-Discussions.
59. Networked Politics: Agency, Power, and Governance. Kahler M, ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2009:.
60. Kaldor MGlobal Civil Society: An Answer to War. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2003:.
61. Kapoor IThe Post-Colonial Politics of Development. London: Routledge; 2008:.
62. Keane DGlobal Civil Society?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003:.
63. Knoll BThe Legal Status of Territories Subject to Administration by International Organisations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008:.
64. Conditionality Revisited: Concepts, Experiences, and Lessons. Koeberle SBedoya HSilarsky PVerheyen G, ed. Washington: World Bank; 2005:.
65. Krasner SD.Sharing sovereignty. New institutions for collapsed and failing states.International Security. 2004;29 (2): 85-120.
66. Kratochwil FRules, Norms, and Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989:.
67. Latour BReassembling the Social. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005:.
68. Linklater A.Dialogic politics and the civilising process.Review of International Studies. 2005;31:141-54.
69. MacGinty R.Indigenous peace-making versus the liberal peace.Cooperation and Conflict. 2008;43 (2): 139-63.
70. Marfleet P. Bibliographical essay. Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter. Asad T, ed. New York: Humanity Books; 1973:273-84.
71. McCargo D.Cambodia: Getting away with authoritarianism.Journal of Democracy. 2005;16 (4): 98-112.
72. Moravcsik A.Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics.International Organization. 1997;51 (4): 513-53.
73. Mosse DCultivating Development. London: Pluto Press; 2005:.
74. Nel P.Redistribution and recognition: What emerging powers want.Review of International Studies. 2010;36 (4): 951-74.
75. Osiander A.Rereading early twentieth-century IR theory: Idealism revisited.International Studies Quarterly. 1998;42:409-32.
76. Paris R.International peacebuilding and the 'mission civilisatrice'.Review of International Studies. 2002;28 (4): 637-56.
77. Paris RAt War's End. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004:.
78. Paris R.Saving liberal peacebuilding.Review of International Studies. 2010;36 (2): 337-65.
79. The Dilemmas of Statebuilding. Paris RSisk TD, ed. London: Routledge; 2009:.
80. Pickett B.Foucault and the politics of resistance.Polity. 1996;28 (4): 445-66.
81. Plant SThe Most Radical Gesture. London: Routledge; 1992:.
82. Pugh M.The political economy of peacebuilding: A critical theory perspective.International Journal of Peace Studies. 2005;10 (2): 23-42.
83. Whose Peace? Critical Perspectives on the Political Economy of Peacebuilding. Pugh MCooper NTurner M, ed. London: Palgrave; 2008:.
84. Randle MCivil Resistance. London: Fontana; 1994:.
85. Handbook of Action Research. Reason PBradbury H, ed. London: Sage; 2001:.
86. Richmond OPMaintaining Order, Making Peace. London: Palgrave; 2002:.
87. Richmond OPTransformation of Peace. London: Palgrave; 2005:.
88. Richmond OPPeace in IR. London: Routledge; 2008:.
89. Richmond OP.A post-liberal peace: Eirenism and the everyday.Review of International Studies. 2009;35 (3): 557-80.
90. Richmond OP.Resistance and the post-liberal peace.Millennium. 2010;38 (3): 665-92.
91. Richmond OPA Post-Liberal Peace. London: Routledge; 2011:.
92. Richmond OP,Franks JLiberal Peace Transitions. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 2009:.
93. Civil Resistance and Power Politics: The Experience of Non-Violent Action from Gandhi to the Present. Roberts AAsh TG, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009:.
94. Rorty RTruth and Progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005:.
95. Rosenau J. Toward an ontology for global governance. Approaches to Global Governance Theory. Hewson MSinclair TJ, ed. Albany, NY: State University of New York; 1999:287-302.
96. Schmeidl S,Karokhail M. How the McDonaldization of state-building misses the mark in Afghanistan. Peace in the Absence of States: Challenging the Discourse on State Failure. Fischer MSchmelzle B, ed. 2009:67-78.
97. Scott JCWeapons of the Weak: Everyday Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1985:.
98. Scott JCDomination and the Arts of Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1990:.
99. Scott JCThe Art of Not Being Governed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2009:.
100. Sharp GPolitics of Non-Violent Action. Boston, MA: Porter Sargent; 1973:.
101. Shaull R. Foreword. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Freire P, ed. London: Penguin; 1996 [1970]:.
102. Sikkink K,Keck MActivists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1998:.
103. Smith S.The discipline of International Relations: Still an American social science?.British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2000;2 (3): 374-402.
104. Snyder JFrom Voting to Violence. London: WW Norton; 2000:.
105. Spivak GC. Can the Subaltern Speak?. Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Nelson CGrossberg L, ed. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1988:271-313.
106. Stiglitz JGlobalization and its Discontents. London: Norton; 2002:.
107. Tilly CCoercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990-1990. Oxford: Blackwell; 1992:.
108. Tilly CSocial Movements, 1768-2004. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers; 2004:.
109. Tilly CDemocracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007:.
110. Vaneigem RThe Revolution of Everyday Life. London: Rebel Press; 1994 [1967]:.
111. Walker RBJOne World, Many Worlds. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner; 1988:.
112. Waltz KMan, the State and War. Columbia University Press; 1959:.
113. Zehfuss MConstructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002:.
114. Zevnik A.Sovereign-less subject and the possibility of resistance.Millennium. 2009;38 (1): 83-106.