Are we all in this together? Co-victimization, inclusive social identity and collective action in solidarity with the disadvantaged

British Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 707-725

  Subašić, Emina ^a   Schmitt, Michael T ^b   Reynolds, Katherine J ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COOPERATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTIVATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL JUSTICE; VICTIM; VULNERABLE POPULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; CRIME VICTIMS; FEMALE; GOALS; HUMANS; MALE; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION; SOCIAL JUSTICE; VULNERABLE POPULATIONS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 82455217404     PISSN: 01446665     EISSN: 20448309     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02073.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
2. Bastholm-Jensen, M., & Jensen, S. L. B. (2003). Introduction. In M. Bastholm-Jensen & S. L. B. Jensen (Eds.), Denmark and the Holocaust. Copenhagen: Institute for International Studies. Department for Holocaust and Genocide Studies.
3. Bierhoff, H.-W., & Fetchenhauer, D. (2006). How to explain prosocial and solidary behavior: A comparison of framing theory with related meta-theoretical paradigms. In D. Fetchenhauer, A. Flache, A. P. Buunk, & S. Lindenberg (Eds.), Solidarity and prosocial behavior: An integration of sociological and psychological perspectives (pp. 225-242). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.
4. Briley, D. A., & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (2002). The effect of group membership salience on the avoidance of negative outcomes: Implications for social and consumer decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(3), 400-415.
5. Brown, R., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. Advances in experimental social psychology, 37, 256-343.
6. Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3, 14-25.
7. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Saguy, T. (2008). Another view of "we": Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 296-330.
8. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Validzic, A., Matoka, K., Johnson, B., & Frazier, S. (1997). Extending the benefits of recategorization: Evaluations, self-disclosure, and helping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 401-420.
9. Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2005) Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 35-58.
10. Friedman, D., & McAdam, D. (1992). Collective identity and activism: Networks, choices and the life of a social movement. In A. D. Morris & C. M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 156-173). New Haven, NT: Yale University Press.
11. Gamson, W. A. (1992). The social psychology of collective action. In A. D. Morris & C. M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 53-76). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12. Granzin, K. L., & Olsen, J. E. (1998). Americans' choice of domestic over foreign products: A matter of helping behavior? Journal of Business Research, 43, 39-54.
13. Haslam, S. A., Branscombe, N. R., & Bachmann, S. (2003). Why consumers rebel: Social identity and the etiology of adverse reations to service failure. In S. A. Haslam, D. Van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 293-310). New York: Psychology Press.
14. Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (1992). Context-dependent variation in social stereotyping 2: The relationship between frame of reference, self-categorization and accentuation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 251-277.
15. Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 143-156.
16. John, A., & Klein, J. (2003). The boycott puzzle: Consumer motivations for purchase sacrifice. Management Science, 49(9), 1196-1209.
17. Klandermans, B. (2000). Identity and protest: How group identification helps to overcome collective action dilemmas. In M. Van Vugt & M. Snyder (Eds.), Cooperation in modern society: Promoting the welfare of communities, states and organizations (pp. 162-183). New York, NY: Routledge.
18. Klandermans, B., Sabucedo, J. M., Rodriguez, M., & de Weerd, M. (2002). Identity processes in collective action participation: Farmers' identity and farmers' protest in the Netherlands and Spain. Political Psychology, 23(2), 235-251.
19. Leach, C. W., Snider, N., & Iyer, A. (2002). Poisoning the consciences of the fortunate: The experience of relative advantage and support for social equality. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development and integration. (pp. 136-163). New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Noor, M., Brown, R., Gonzales, R., Manzi, J., & Lewis, C. A. (2008). On positive psychological outcomes: What helps groups with a history of conflict to forgive and reconcile with each other?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 819-832.
21. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 36(4), 717-731.
23. Reed, A., II (2002). Social identity as a useful perspective for self-concept-based consumer research. Psychology & Marketing, 19(3), 235-266.
24. Simon, B. (2004). Identity in modern society. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
25. Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56(4), 319-331.
26. Simon, B., Loewy, M., Stürmer, S., Weber, U., Freytag, P., Habig, C., Spahlinger, P. (1998). Collective identification and social movement participation. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 74(3), 646-658.
27. Stewart, T. L., Latu, I. M., Branscombe, N. R., & Denney, H. T. (2010). "Yes we can:" Prejudice reduction through seeing (inequality) and believing (in social change). Psychological Science, 21(11), 1557-1562.
28. Stürmer, S., Snyder, M., Kropp, A., & Siem, B. (2006). Empathy-motivated helping: The moderating role of group membership. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(7), 943-956.
29. Subašić, E., & Reynolds, K. J. (2009). Beyond 'practical reconciliation': Intergroup inequality and the meaning of non-indigenous identity. Political Psychology, 30(2), 243-268.
30. Subašić, E., Reynolds, K. J., & Turner, J. C. (2008). The political solidarity model of social change: Dynamics of self-categorization in intergroup power relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(4), 330-352.
31. Tajfel, H. (1978). Social Psychology of MInorities. London: Minority Rights Group.
32. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33-48). Monterey, CA: Brooks Cole.
33. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-categorization Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
34. Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504-535.
35. Van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., & Leach, C. W. (2008). Exploring psychological mechanisms of collective action: Does relevant of group identity influence how people cope with collective disadvantage? British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(2), 353-372.
36. Van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Leach, C. W., & Fischer, A. H. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 649-664.
37. Veenstra, K., & Haslam, S. A. (2000). Willingness to participate in industrial protest: Exploring social identification in context. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(2), 153-172.
38. Vollhardt, J. R. (2009a). Altruism born of suffering and prosocial behavior following adverse life events: A review and conceptualization. Social Justice Research, 22, 53-97.
39. Vollhardt, J. R. (2009b). The role of victim beliefs in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: Risk or potential for peace?. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 15, 135-159.
40. Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 249-268.
41. Wenzel, M., Mummendey, A., & Waldzus, S. (2008). Superordinate identities and intergroup conflict: The ingroup projection model. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 331-372.
42. Wilder, D. A., & Thompson, J. E. (1988). Assimilation and contrast effects in the judgement of groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 62-73.
43. Wohl, M. J., & Branscombe, N. R. (2005). Forgiveness and collective guilt assignment to historical perpetrator groups depend on level of social category inclusiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 288-303.
44. Zald, M., & McCarthy, J. D. (1979). The dynamics of social movements: Resource mobilisation, social control and tactics. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.