Label-free shotgun proteomics and metabolite analysis reveal a significant metabolic shift during citrus fruit development

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 62, Issue 15, 2011, Pages 5367-5384

  Katz, Ehud ^a   Boo, Kyung Hwan ^a   Kim, Ho Youn ^a   Eigenheer, Richard A ^a   Phinney, Brett S ^a   Shulaev, Vladimir ^b   Negre Zakharov, Florence ^a   Sadka, Avi ^c   Blumwald, Eduardo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

^c VOLCANI CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

Citrus; fruit development; juice sac cells; LC MS MS; proteomics

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSYLTRANSFERASE; PHOSPHATASE; SUCROSE PHOSPHATASE; SUCROSE PHOSPHATE SYNTHASE; SUCROSE-PHOSPHATASE; SUCROSE-PHOSPHATE SYNTHASE; VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CITRUS; FRUIT; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PROTEOMICS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

CITRUS; FRUIT; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GLUCOSYLTRANSFERASES; PHOSPHORIC MONOESTER HYDROLASES; PLANT PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 82255163310     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: 14602431     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/err197     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. America AHP, Cordewener JHG. 2008. Comparative LC-MS: a landscape of peaks and valleys. Proteomics 8, 731-749. (Pubitemid 351362933)
2. Bain JM. 1958. Morphological, anatomical, and physiological changes in the developing fruit of the Valencia orange, Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck. Australian Journal of Botany 6, 1-23.
3. Bantscheff M, Schirle M, Sweetman G, Rick J, Kuster B. 2007. Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review. Analytical Biochemistry 389, 1017-1031. (Pubitemid 47482251)
4. Baxter CJ, Foyer CH, Turner J, Rolfe SA, Quick WP. 2003. Elevated sucrose-phosphate synthase activity in transgenic tobacco sustains photosynthesis in older leaves and alters development. Journal of Experimental Botany 54, 1813-1820. (Pubitemid 36946758)
5. BouchéN, Fait A, Bouchez D, Møller SG, Fromm H. 2003. Mitochondrial succinic-semialdehyde dehydrogenase of the c-aminobutyrate shunt is required to restrict levels of reactive oxygen intermediates in plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 100, 6843-6848. (Pubitemid 36666667)
6. Bradford MM. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of proteins utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anaytical Biochemistry 72, 248-254.
7. Canel C, Bailey-Serres JN, Roose ML. 1996. Molecular characterization of the mitochondrial citrate synthase gene of an acidless pummelo (Citrus maxima). Plant Molecular Biology 31, 143-147. (Pubitemid 26320404)
8. Carrari F, Baxter C, Usadel B, et al. 2006. Integrated analysis of metabolite and transcript levels reveals the metabolic shifts that underlie tomato fruit development and highlight regulatory aspects of metabolic network behavior. Plant Physiology 142, 1380-1396. (Pubitemid 44956921)
9. Cercos M, Soler G, Iglesias DJ, Gadea J, Forment J, Talon M. 2006. Global analysis of gene expression during development and ripening of citrus fruit flesh. a proposed mechanism for citric acid utilization. Plant Molecular Biology 62, 513-527. (Pubitemid 44652247)
10. Choi H, Fermin D, Nesvizhskii AI. 2008. Significance analysis of spectral count data in label-free shotgun proteomics. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 7, 2373-2385.
11. da Silva FG, Iandolino A, Al-Kayal F, et al. 2005. Characterizing the grape transcriptome. Analysis of expressed sequence tags from multiple Vitis species and development of a compendium of gene expression during berry development. Plant Physiology 139, 574-597. (Pubitemid 43907089)
12. Deluc L, Grimplet J, Wheatley M, Tillett R, Quilici D, Osborne C, Schooley D, Schlauch K, Cushman J, Cramer G. 2007. Transcriptomic and metabolite analyses of Cabernet Sauvignon grape berry development. BMC Genomics 8, 429.
13. Echeverria E. 1992. Activities of sucrose metabolising enzymes during sucrose accumulation in developing acid limes. Plant Science 85, 125-129.
14. Echeverria E, Burns JK. 1990. Sucrose breakdown in relation to fruit growth of acid lime (Citrus aurantifolia). Journal of Experimental Botnay 41, 705-708.
15. Elias JE, Haas W, Faherty BK, Gygi SP. 2005. Comparative evaluation of mass spectrometry platforms used in large-scale proteomics investigations. Nature Methods 2, 667-675. (Pubitemid 41223093)
16. Fait A, Hanhineva K, Beleggia R, Dai N, Rogachev I, Nikiforova VJ, Fernie AR, Aharoni A. 2008. Reconfiguration of the achene and receptacle metabolic networks during strawberry fruit development. Plant Physiology 148, 730-750. (Pubitemid 352847532)
17. Gibon Y, Blaesing OE, Hannemann J, Carillo P, Hohne M, Hendriks JHM, Palacios N, Cross J, Selbig J, Stitt M. 2004. A robot-based platform to measure multiple enzyme activities in Arabidopsis using a set of cycling assays: comparison of changes of enzyme activities and transcript levels during diurnal cycles and in prolonged darkness. The Plant Cell 16, 3304-3325. (Pubitemid 41096008)
18. Gibon Y, Usadel B, Blaesing O, Kamlage B, Hoehne M, Trethewey R, Stitt M. 2006. Integration of metabolite with transcript and enzyme activity profiling during diurnal cycles in Arabidopsis rosettes. Genome Biology 7, R76.
19. Gygi SP, Rochon Y, Franza BR, Aebersold R. 1999. Correlation between protein and mRNA abundance in yeast. Molecular and Cellular Biology 19, 1720-1730. (Pubitemid 29098230)
20. Harwood JE, van Steenderen RA, Kühn AL. 1969. A rapid method for orthophosphate analysis at high concentrations in water. Water Research 3, 417-423.
21. Jenner HL, Winning BM, Millar AH, Tomlinson KL, Leaver CJ, Hill SA. 2001. NAD malic enzyme and the control of carbohydrate metabolism in potato tubers. Plant Physiology 126, 1139-1149. (Pubitemid 32656801)
22. Jin Y, Ni DA, Ruan YL. 2009. Post-translational elevation of cell wall invertase activity by silencing its inhibitor in tomato delays leaf senescence and increases seed weight and fruit hexose level. The Plant Cell 21, 2072-2089.
23. Kall L, Storey JD, MacCoss MJ, Noble WS. 2008. Assigning significance to peptides identified by tandem mass spectrometry using decoy databases. Journal of Proteome Research 7, 29-34. (Pubitemid 351171110)
24. Katz E, Fon M, Eigenheer RA, Phinney BS, Sadka A, Blumwald E. 2010. A label-free differential quantitative mass spectrometry method for the characterization and identification of protein changes during citrus fruit development. Proteome Science 8, 68.
25. Katz E, Fon M, Lee Y, Phinney B, Sadka A, Blumwald E. 2007. The citrus fruit proteome: insights into citrus fruit metabolism. Planta 226, 989-1005. (Pubitemid 47283090)
26. Katz E, Lagunes PM, Riov J, Weiss D, Goldschmidt EE. 2004. Molecular and physiological evidence suggests the existence of a system II-like pathway of ethylene production in non-climacteric citrus fruit. Planta 219, 243-252. (Pubitemid 39428780)
27. Keller A, Nesvizhskii AI, Kolker E, Aebersold R. 2002. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Analytical Chemistry 74, 5383-5392. (Pubitemid 35215372)
28. Koch K. 2004. Sucrose metabolism: regulatory mechanisms and pivotal roles in sugar sensing and plant development. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 7, 235-246. (Pubitemid 38611043)
29. Koch KE. 1984. The path of photosynthate translocation into citrus fruit. Plant, Cell and Environment 7, 647-653.
30. Koch KE, Avigne WT. 1990. Post-phloem, non-vascular transfer in citrus: kinetics, metabolism, and sugar gradients. Plant Physiology 93, 1405-1416. (Pubitemid 120029967)
31. Komatsu A, Moriguchi T, Koyama K, Omura M, Akihama T. 2002. Analysis of sucrose synthase genes in citrus suggests different roles and phylogenetic relationships. Journal of Experimental Botany 53, 61-71. (Pubitemid 34043143)
32. Kubo T, Hohjo I, Hiratsuka S. 2001. Sucrose accumulation and its related enzyme activities in the juice sacs of satsuma mandarin fruit from trees with different crop loads. Scientia Horticulturae 91, 215-225. (Pubitemid 33136651)
33. Kummel A, Panke S, Heinemann M. 2006. Putative regulatory sites unraveled by network-embedded thermodynamic analysis of metabolome data. Molecular Systems Biology 2, 00342006.
34. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-[delta][delta]CT method. Methods 25, 402-408. (Pubitemid 34164012)
35. Lowell CA, Tomlinson PT, Koch KE. 1989. Sucrose-metabolizing enzymes in transport tissues and adjacent sink structures in developing citrus fruit. Plant Physiology 90, 1394-1402.
36. Lunn JE, Ashton AR, Hatch MD, Heldt HW. 2000. Purification, molecular cloning and sequence analysis of sucrose-6F-phosphate phosphohydrolase from plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97, 12914-12919.
37. Mounet F, Moing A, Garcia V, et al. 2009. Gene and metabolite regulatory network analysis of early developing fruit tissues highlights new candidate genes for the control of tomato fruit composition and development. Plant Physiology 149, 1505-1528.
38. Mustroph A, Sonnewald U, Biemelt S. 2007. Characterisation of the ATP-dependent phosphofructokinase gene family from. Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Letters 581, 2401-2410. (Pubitemid 46764696)
39. Nesvizhskii AI, Keller A, Kolker E, Aebersold R. 2003. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry 75, 4646-4658. (Pubitemid 37082259)
40. Roessner U, Wagner C, Kopka J, Trethewey RN, Willmitzer L. 2000. Simultaneous analysis of metabolites in potato tuber by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The Plant Journal 23, 131-142. (Pubitemid 30597788)
41. Sadka A, Dahan E, Or E, Cohen L. 2000. NADP(+) isocitrate dehydrogenase gene expression and isozyme activity during citrus fruit development. Plant Science 158, 173-181.
42. Schulze WX, Usadel B. 2010. Quantitation in mass-spectrometry-based proteomics. Annual Review of Plant Biology 61, 491-516.
43. Shimada T, Nakano R, Shulaev V, Sadka A, Blumwald E. 2006. Vacuolar citrate/H+ symporter of citrus juice cells. Planta 224, 472-480. (Pubitemid 43948238)
44. Spiegel-Roy P, Goldschmidt EE. 1996. Biology of citrus. Cambridge University Press.
45. Suzuki A, Kanayama Y, Yamaki S. 1996. Occurrence of two sucrose synthase isozymes during maturation of Japanese pear fruit. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 121, 943-947. (Pubitemid 27005031)
46. Sweetlove LJ, Beard KFM, Nunes-Nesi A, Fernie AR, Ratcliffe RG. 2010. Not just a circle: flux modes in the plant TCA cycle. Trends in Plant Science 15, 462-470.
47. Sweetman C, Deluc LG, Cramer GR, Ford CM, Soole KL. 2009. Regulation of malate metabolism in grape berry and other developing fruits. Phytochemistry 70, 1329-1344.
48. Talon M, Gmitter FG. 2008. Citrus genomics. International Journal of Plant Genomics doi:10.1155/2008/528361 . (Pubitemid 351846745)
49. Thimm O, Blä sing O, Gibon Y, Nagel A, Meyer S, Krü ger P, Selbig J, Müller LA, Rhee SY, Stitt M. 2004. MapMan: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. The Plant Journal 37, 914-939. (Pubitemid 38370342)
50. Tomlinson PT, Duke ER, Nolte KD, Koch KE. 1991. Sucrose synthase and invertase in isolated vascular bundles. Plant Physiology 97, 1249-1252. (Pubitemid 21914354)
51. Usadel B, Nagel A, Thimm O, et al. 2005. Extension of the visualization tool MapMan to allow statistical analysis of arrays, display of coresponding genes, and comparison with known responses. Plant Physiology 138, 1195-1204. (Pubitemid 43142069)
52. Vargas WA, Salerno GL. 2010. The Cinderella story of sucrose hydrolysis: alkaline/neutral invertases, from cyanobacteria to unforeseen roles in plant cytosol and organelles. Plant Science 178, 1-8.
53. Ward JH. 1963. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58, 236-244.
54. Wienkoop S, Morgenthal K, Wolschin F, Scholz M, Selbig J, Weckwerth W. 2008. Integration of metabolomic and proteomic phenotypes: analysis of data covariance dissects starch and RFO metabolism from low and high temperature compensation response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Molecular Cell Proteomics 7, 1725-1736.
55. Zanor MI, Rambla J-L, Chaib J, Steppa A, Medina A, Granell A, Fernie AR, Causse M. 2009. Metabolic characterization of loci affecting sensory attributes in tomato allows an assessment of the influence of the levels of primary metabolites and volatile organic contents. Journal of Experimental Botany 60, 2139-2154.
56. Ziliotto F, Begheldo M, Rasori A, Bonghi C, Tonutti P. 2008. Transcriptome profiling of ripening nectarine (Prunus persica L. Batsch) fruit treated with 1-MCP. Journal of Experimental Botany 59, 2781-2791. (Pubitemid 351957496)