Early biomechanical keratoconus pattern measured with an ocular response analyzer: Curve analysis

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Volumn 37, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 2144-2150

  Touboul, David ^a   Bénard, Antoine ^b   Mahmoud, Ashraf M ^a   Gallois, Anne ^a   Colin, Joseph ^a   Roberts, Cynthia J ^c  

^a Department of Ophthalmology ^*

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

^c Ohio State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYZER; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; CORNEA THICKNESS; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KERATOCONUS; KERATOMILEUSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OCULAR RESPONSE ANALYZER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHILD; CORNEA; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; ELASTICITY; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; KERATOCONUS; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROBABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 81855194482     PISSN: 08863350     EISSN: 18734502     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.06.029     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. D.A. Luce Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer J Cataract Refract Surg 31 2005 156 162 (Pubitemid 40260703)
2. K.W. Hollman, S.Y. Emelianov, J.H. Neiss, G. Jotyan, G.J.R. Spooner, T. Juhasz, R.M. Kurtz, and M. O'Donnell Strain imaging of corneal tissue with an ultrasound elasticity microscope Cornea 21 2002 68 73 (Pubitemid 33144407)
3. T.D. Nguyen, R.E. Jones, and B.L. Boyce A nonlinear anisotropic viscoelastic model for the tensile behavior of the corneal stroma J Biomech Eng 130 2008 041020
4. D.H. Glass, C.J. Roberts, A.S. Litsky, and P.A. Weber A viscoelastic biomechanical model of the cornea describing the effect of viscosity and elasticity on hysteresis Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49 2008 3919 3926 Available at: http://www.iovs.org/cgi/reprint/49/9/3919 Accessed July 8, 2011
5. A. Elsheikh, D. Alhasso, and P. Rama Biomechanical properties of human and porcine corneas Exp Eye Res 86 2008 783 790
6. D. Ortiz, D. Piñero, M.H. Shabayek, F. Arnalich-Montiel, and J.L. Alió Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes J Cataract Refract Surg 33 2007 1371 1375 (Pubitemid 47096684)
7. J.S. Pepose, S.K. Feigenbaum, M.A. Qazi, J.P. Sanderson, and C.J. Roberts Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry Am J Ophthalmol 143 2007 39 47
8. D. Touboul, C. Roberts, J. Kérautret, C. Garra, S. Maurice-Tison, E. Saubusse, and J. Colin Correlations between corneal hysteresis, intraocular pressure, and corneal central pachymetry J Cataract Refract Surg 34 2008 616 622 (Pubitemid 351444755)
9. A. Kotecha, A. Elsheikh, C.R. Roberts, H. Zhu, and D.F. Garway-Heath Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47 2006 5337 5347 Available at: http://www.iovs.org/cgi/reprint/47/12/5337 Accessed July 8, 2011 (Pubitemid 46729154)
10. J. Wasielica-Poslednik, F. Berisha, S. Aliyeva, N. Pfeiffer, and E.M. Hoffmann Reproducibility of ocular response analyzer measurements and their correlation with central corneal thickness Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 248 2010 1617 1622
11. M. Detry-Morel, J. Jamart, and S. Pourjavan Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties with the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer Eur J Ophthalmol 21 2011 138 148
12. K. Kamiya, K. Shimizu, and F. Ohmoto Effect of aging on corneal biomechanical parameters using the Ocular Response Analyzer J Refract Surg 25 2009 888 893
13. M.A. Del Buey, J.A. Cristóbal, F.J. Ascaso, L. Lavilla, and E. Lanchares Biomechanical properties of the cornea in Fuchs' corneal dystrophy Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50 2009 3199 3202 Available at: http://www.iovs.org/ content/50/7/3199.full.pdf Accessed July 8, 2011
14. A.P. Wells, D.F. Garway-Heath, A. Poostchi, T. Wong, K.C.Y. Chan, and N. Sachdev Corneal hysteresis but not corneal thickness correlates with optic nerve surface compliance in glaucoma patients Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49 2008 3262 3268 Available at: http://www.iovs.org/content/49/8/3262.full.pdf Accessed July 8, 2011
15. B.M. Fontes, R. Ambrósio Jr. , M. Salomão, G.C. Velarde, and W. Nosé Biomechanical and tomographic analysis of unilateral keratoconus J Refract Surg 26 2010 677 681
16. J.B. Randleman Post-laser in-situ keratomileusis ectasia: current understanding and future directions Curr Opin Ophthalmol 17 2006 406 412 (Pubitemid 44215053)
17. C. Schweitzer, C.J. Roberts, A.M. Mahmoud, J. Colin, S. Maurice-Tison, and J. Kerautret Screening of forme fruste keratoconus with the Ocular Response Analyzer Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51 2010 2403 2410 Available at: http://www.iovs.org/content/51/5/2403.full.pdf Accessed July 8, 2011
18. J.H. Krumeich, J. Daniel, and A. Knülle Live-epikeratophakia for keratoconus J Cataract Refract Surg 24 1998 456 463 (Pubitemid 30195921)
19. S. Jonuscheit, and M.J. Doughty Regional repeatability measures of corneal thickness: Orbscan II and ultrasound Optom Vis Sci 84 2007 52 58 (Pubitemid 46105020)
20. S. Haque, T. Simpson, and L. Jones Corneal and epithelial thickness in keratoconus: a comparison of ultrasonic pachymetry, Orbscan II, and optical coherence tomography J Refract Surg 22 2006 486 493 (Pubitemid 43736477)
21. K.C. Ogbuehi, and T.M. Almubrad Evaluation of the intraocular pressure measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer Curr Eye Res 35 2010 587 596
22. R. Ambrósio Jr. , S.D. Klyce, and S.E. Wilson Corneal topographic and pachymetric screening of keratorefractive patients J Refract Surg 19 2003 24 29 (Pubitemid 36126021)
23. J.T. Barr, B.S. Wilson, M.O. Gordon, M.J. Rah, C. Riley, P.S. Kollbaum, and K. Zadnik CLEK Study Group. Estimation of the incidence and factors predictive of corneal scarring in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study Cornea 25 2006 16 25 (Pubitemid 43031143)
24. ® in normal and glaucomatous eyes Acta Ophthalmol (Oxf) 88 2010 116 119
25. N.H.L. Bayoumi, A.S. Bessa, and A.A.K. El Massry Ocular Response Analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study of findings J Glaucoma 19 2010 627 631
26. J. Liu, and C.J. Roberts Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement; quantitative analysis J Cataract Refract Surg 31 2005 146 155 (Pubitemid 40260702)
27. B.M. Fontes, R. Ambrósio Jr. , G.C. Velarde, and W. Nosé Ocular response analyzer measurements in keratoconus with normal central corneal thickness compared with matched normal control eyes J Refract Surg 27 2011 209 215
28. M. Tanter, D. Touboul, J.-L. Gennisson, J. Bercoff, and M. Fink High-resolution quantitative imaging of cornea elasticity using supersonic shear imaging IEEE Trans Med Imaging 28 2009 1881 1893
29. D.A. Luce Methodology for corneal compensated IOP and corneal resistance factor for the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer IOVS 47 2006 ARVO E-Abstract 2266
30. Roberts C, "Dynamic Corneal Surface Topography: in Vivo Measurement of Spatially-Resolved Biomechanical Properties," presented at the XXVIII Congress of the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons, Paris, France, September 2010