Key issues in reconciliation: Challenging traditional assumptionson conflict resolution and power dynamics

Intergroup Conflicts and Their Resolution: A Social Psychological Perspective

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 291-314

  Rouhana, Nadim N ^a  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 81755168514     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203834091     Document Type: Chapter

References (66)

1. Azar, E. E. (1990). The management of protracted conflict. Hampshire, England: Dartmouth Publishing Company.
2. Bar-Siman-Tov, Y. (2008). Dialectics between stable peace and reconciliation. In Y. Bar-Siman-Tov (Ed.), From conflict resolution to reconciliation (pp. 61–80). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
3. Bar-Tal, D. (2009). Reconciliation as a foundation of culture of peace. In J. Rivera (Ed.), Handbook on building cultures of peace (pp. 363–375). New York: Springer Science.
4. Bar-Tal, D., & Bennink, G. H. (2004). The nature of reconciliation as an outcome and as a process. In Y. Bar-Siman-Tov (Ed.), From conflict resolution to reconciliation (pp. 11–38). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
5. Baron, R. M. (2008). Reconciliation, trust, and cooperation: Using bottom-up and top-down strategies to achieve peace in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In A. Nadler, T. Malloy, & J. Fisher (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 275–300). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
6. Bashir, B. (2008). Accommodating historically oppressed social groups: Deliberative democracy and the politics of reconciliation. In B. Bashir & W. Kymlicka (Eds.), The politics of reconciliation in multicultural societies (pp. 48–69). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
7. Bashir, B., & Kymlicka, W. (Eds.). (2008). Introduction: Struggles for inclusion and reconciliation in modern democracies.The politics of reconciliation in multicultural societies (pp. 1–24). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
8. Branscombe, N. R. (2004). A social psychological process perspective on collective guilt. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 320–334). New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Bretherton, D., & Mellor, D. (2006). Reconciliation between aboriginal and other Australians: The “Stolen Generations”. Journal of Social Issues, 62(1), 81–98.
10. Burton, J. W. (1990). Conflict: Resolution and prevention. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
11. Crocker, D. A. (1999). Reckoning with past wrongs: A normative framework. Ethics & International Affairs, 13, 43–64.
12. Curle, A. (1971). Making peace. London: Tavistock Press.
13. Dwyer, S. (1999). Reconciliation for realists. Ethics & International Affairs, 13, 81–98.
14. Fisher, R. (1991). Negotiating power: Getting and using influence. In J. W. Breslin & J. Z. Rubin (Eds.), Negotiation theory and practice (pp. 127–140). Cambridge: PON Books.
15. Fisher, R. J. (Ed.). (1997). Interactive conflict resolution. Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press.
16. Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–191.
17. Galtung, J. (1990). Cultural violence. Journal of Peace Research, 27(3), 291–305.
18. Gibson, J. L. (2004). Does truth lead to reconciliation? Testing the causal assumptions of the South African truth and reconciliation process. American Journal of Political Science, 48(2), 201–217.
19. Gibson, J. L. (2006). The contributions of truth to reconciliation: Lessons from South Africa. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50(3), 409–432.
20. Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Halloran, M. J. (2007). Indigenous reconciliation in Australia: Do values, identity and collective guilt matter? Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 17(1), 1–18.
22. Harris, L. T., & Fiske, S. T. (2008). Diminishing vertical distance: Power and social status as barriers to intergroup reconciliation. In A. Nadler, T. Malloy, & J. Fisher (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 301–318). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
23. Hayner, P. B. (2001). Unspeakable truths: Confronting state terror and atrocities. New York: Routledge.
24. Hermann, T. (2004). Reconciliation: Reflections on the theoretical and practical utility of the term. In Y. Bar-Siman-Tov (Ed.), From conflict resolution to reconciliation (pp. 39–60). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
25. Kelman, H. C. (1982). Creating the conditions for Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 26, 39–75.
26. Kelman, H. C. (1986). Overcoming the barriers to negotiation of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Journal of Palestine Studies, 16(1), 13–28.
27. Kelman, H. C. (1996). Negotiation as interactive problem-solving. International Negotiation: A Journal of Theory and Practice, 1, 99–123.
28. Kelman, H. C. (1998). Building a sustainable peace: The limits of pragmatism in the Israeli-Palestinian negotiation. Journal of Palestine Studies, 28, 36–50.
29. Kelman, H. C. (2004). Reconciliation as identity change: A social psychological perspective. In Y. Bar-Siman-Tov (Ed.), From conflict resolution to reconciliation (pp. 111–124). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
30. Kriesberg, L. (2004). Comparing reconciliation actions within and between countries. In Y. Bar-Siman-Tov (Ed.), From conflict resolution to reconciliation (pp. 81–110). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
31. Laue, J., & Cormick, G. (1978). The ethics of intervention in community disputes. In G. Bermant, H. C. Kelman, & D. P. Warwick (Eds.), The ethics of social intervention (pp. 205–232). Washington, DC: Halsted Press.
32. Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
33. Little, D. (1999). A different kind of justice: Dealing with human rights violations in transitional societies. Ethics & International Affairs, 13, 65–80.
34. Lustick, I. S. (2005). Negotiating truth: The Holocaust, Lehavdil, and al-Nakba. In A. Lesch & I. Lustick (Eds.), Exile and return: Predicaments of Palestinians and Jews (pp. 106–127). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
35. Malloy, T. E. (2008). Intergroup relations and reconciliation: Theoretical analysis and methodological implications. In A. Nadler, T. Malloy, & J. Fisher (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 345–368). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
36. Maoz, I. (2004). Social-cognitive mechanisms in reconciliation. In Y. Bar-Siman-Tov (Ed.), From conflict resolution to reconciliation (pp. 197–224). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
37. Minow, M. (1999). Between vengeance and forgiveness: Facing history after genocide and mass violence. Boston: Beacon Press.
38. Miron, A. M., & Branscombe, N. R. (2008). Social categorization, standard of justice, and collective guilt. In A. Nadler, T. Malloy, & J. Fisher (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 77–96). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
39. Mitchell, C. (1990). Necessitous man and conflict resolution: More basic questions about basic human needs theory. In J. Burton (Ed.), Conflict: Human needs theory (pp. 149–176). New York: St. Martin’s Press.
40. Nadler, A., & Liviatan, I. (2006). Intergroup reconciliation: Effects of adversary’s expressions of empathy, responsibility, and recipients’ trust. Personality and Psychology Bulletin, 32(4), 459–470.
41. Nadler, A., & Saguy, T. (2004). Reconciliation between nations: Overcoming emotional deterrents to ending conflicts between groups. In H. Langholtz & C.E. Stout (Eds.), The Psychology of Diplomacy (pp. 29–46). Westport, CT: Praeger.
42. Nadler, A., Malloy, T. E., & Fisher, J. D. (Eds.). (2008). The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
43. Noor, M., Brown, R., & Prentice, G. (2008). Prospects for intergroup reconciliation: Social-psychological predictors of intergroup forgiveness and reparation in northern Ireland and Chile. In A. Nadler, T. Malloy, & J. Fisher (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 97–116). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
44. Noor, M., Brown, R., Gonzalez, R., Manzi, J., & Lewis, C.A. (2008). On positive psychological outcomes: What helps groups with a history of conflict to forgive and reconcile with each other? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(6), 819–832.
45. Peled, Y., & Rounaha, N. N. (2004). Transitional justice and the right of return of the Palestinian refugees. Theoretical Inquiries in Law. 5, 317–332.
46. Philpot, C. R., & Hornsey, M. J. (2008). What happens when groups say sorry: The effect of intergroup apologies on their recipients. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(4), 474–486.
47. Popkin, M., & Bhuta, N. (1999). Latin America amnesties in comparative perspective: Can the past be buried? Ethics & International Affairs, 13, 99–122.
48. Ramsbotham, O., Woodhouse, T., & Miall, H. (2005). Contemporary conflict resolution. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
49. Richmond, O. P. (2001). Towards a genealogy of peacemaking: The creation and recreation of order. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 26(3), 317–343.
50. Roccas, S., Klar, Y., & Liviatan, I. (2006). The paradox of group-based guilt: Modes of national identifi cation, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group’s moral violations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 698–711.
51. Ross, M. H. (2004). Ritual and the politics of reconciliation. In Y. Bar-Siman-Tov (Ed.), From conflict resolution to reconciliation (pp. 197–224). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
52. Rouhana, N. N. (2004a). Group identity and power asymmetry in reconciliation processes: The Israeli-Palestinian case. Peace and Conflict, 10(1), 33–52.
53. Rouhana, N. N. (2004b). Identity and power in the reconciliation of national conflict. In A. Eagly, R. Baron, & V. Hamilton (Eds.), The social psychology of group identity and social conflict: Theory, application, and practice (pp. 173–187). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
54. Rouhana, N. N. (2005). Truth and reconciliation: The right of return in the context of past injustice. In A. Lesch & I. Lustick (Eds.), Exile and return: Predicaments of Palestinians and Jews (pp. 261–278). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
55. Rouhana, N. N. (2008). Reconciling history and equal citizenship in Israel: Democracy and the politics of historical denial. In B. Bashir & W. Kymlicka (Eds.), The politics of reconciliation in multicultural societies (pp. 70–93). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
56. Rubin, J. Z., & Salacuse, J. W. (1990). The problem of power in negotiation. International Affairs, 1, 24–34.
57. Shnabel, N., & Nadler, A. (2008). A needs-based model of reconciliation: Satisfying the differential emotional needs of victim and perpetrator as a key to promoting reconciliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(1), 116–132.
58. Shnabel, N., Nadler, A., Ullrich, J., Dovidio, J. F., & Carmi, D. (2009). Promoting reconciliation through the satisfaction of the emotional needs of victimized and perpetrating group members: The needs-based model of reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(8), 1021–1030.
59. Spears, R. M. (2008). Social identity, legitimacy, and intergroup conflict: The rocky road to reconciliation. In A. Nadler, T. Malloy, & J. Fisher (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 319–344). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
60. Starzyk, K. B., & Ross, M. (2008). A tarnished silver lining: Victim suffering and support for reparations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(3), 366–380.
61. Staub, E., Pearlman, L. A., Gubin, A., & Hagengimana, A. (2005). Healing, reconciliation, forgiving and the prevention of violence after genocide or mass killing: An intervention and its experimental evaluation in Rwanda. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24(3).
62. Stephan, W. G. (2008). The road to reconciliation. In A. Nadler, T. Malloy, & J. Fisher (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 369–394). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
63. Tutu, D. (1999). No future without forgiveness. New York: Doubleday.
64. VanAntwerpen, J. (2008). Reconciliation reconceived: Religion, secularism, and the language of transition. In B. Bashir & W. Kymlicka (Eds.), The politics of reconciliation in multicultural societies (pp. 25–47). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
65. Van Zyl, P. (1999). Dilemmas of transitional justice: The case of South Africa’s truth and reconciliation commission. Journal of International Affairs, 52, 647–667.
66. Worchel, S., & Coutant, D. K. (2008). Between conflict and reconciliation: toward a theory of peaceful coexistence. In A. Nadler, T. Malloy, & J. Fisher (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 423–446). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.