Prospects for Intergroup Reconciliation: Social-Psychological Predictors of Intergroup Forgiveness and Reparation in Northern Ireland and Chile

The Social Psychology of Intergroup Reconciliation

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Noor, Masi ^a   Brown, Rupert ^b   Prentice, Garry ^c  

^a CANTERBURY CHRIST CHURCH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^c DUBLIN BUSINESS SCHOOL   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Chile; Democracy; Dictatorship; Indigenous people; Intergroup reconciliation; Northern Ireland; Political change

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920424052     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195300314.003.0006     Document Type: Chapter

References (41)

1. Alexander, R. J. (1978). The tragedy of Chile. UK: Greenwood Press.
2. Bar-Siman-Tov, Y. (2004). From conflict resolution to reconciliation. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.
3. Bar-Tal, D., & Bennink, G. H. (2004). The nature of reconciliation as an outcome and as a process. In Y. Bar-Siman-Tov (Ed.), From conflict resolution to reconciliation (pp. 11-38. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.
4. Branscombe, N. R., & Doosje, B. (2004). Collective guilt international perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Branscombe, N. R., Slugoski, B., & Kappen, D. M. (2004). The measurement of collective guilt: what it is and what it is not. In N. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 16-34. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Brewer, M. B., & Brown, R. J. (1998). Intergroup relations. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 554-594. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7. Brown, R., & Cehajic, S. (in press). Dealing with the past and facing the future: Mediators of collective guilt and shame in Bosnia Herzegovina. European Journal of Social Psychology.
8. Brown, R. J., Condor, S., Mathews, A., Wade, G., & Williams, J. A. (1986). Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organisation. Journal of Occupation Psychology, 59, 273-286.
9. Brown, R., Gonzalez, R., Zagefka, H., Manzi, J., & Cehajic, S. (in press). Nuestra culpa: Collective guilt as a predictor of reparation for historical wrongdoing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
10. Darby, J., & Mac Ginty, R. (2000). The management of peace processes. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
11. Dixon, P. (2001). Northern Ireland the politics of war and peace. New York: Palgrave.
12. Enright, R. D., & North, J. (1998). Exploring forgiveness. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
13. Ensalaco, M. (2000). Chile under Pinochet. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
14. Fay, M. T., Morrissey, M., & Smyth, M. (1999). Northern Ireland's troubles: The human costs. London: Pluto Press.
15. Hewstone, M., Cairns, E., Voci, A., McLernon, F., Niens, U., & Noor, M. (2004). Intergroup forgiveness and guilt in Northern Ireland: Social psychological dimensions of "The Troubles." In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt international perspectives (pp. 193-215. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575-604.
17. Instituto Nacional de Estadística (2002). Estadísticas sociales de los pueblos indígenas en Chile. Santiago: Gobierno de Chile.
18. Kelly, G., & Hamber, H. (2005). Reconciliation: Rhetoric or relevant? Democratic Dialogue Report 17. Belfast: The Northernwhig Ltd.
19. Kelman, H. C. (2004). Reconciliation as identity change: A social-psychological perspective. In Y. Bar-Siman-Tov (Ed.), From conflict resolution to reconciliation (pp. 81-124. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.
20. Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
21. Lickel, B., Schmader, T., & Barquissan, M. (2004). The evocation of moral emotions in intergroup contexts: The distinction between collective guilt and collective shame. Collective guilt: International perspectives. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt international perspectives (pp. 35-55. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. McCullough, M. E. (2001). Forgiveness: Who does it and how do they do it? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 194-197.
23. McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L. Jr., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 75, 1586-1603.
24. McGarty, C., Pederson, A., Leach, C. W., Mansell, T., Waller, J., & Bliuc, A.-M. (2005). Group-based guilt as a predictor of commitment to apology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44(4), 645-657.
25. Ministerio de Planificación y Cooperación (2003). Informe comisión de verdad histórica y nuevo trato de los pueblos indígenas. Santiago: Gobierno de Chile.
26. Mitchell, C. (2000). Gestures of Conciliation factors contributing to successful olive branches. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
27. Morrow, D. (2001). Forgiveness and reconciliation response. In B. Hamber, D. Kulle, & R. Wilson (Eds.), Future policies for the past. Belfast: Democratic Dialogue.
28. Nadler, A. (2003). Post resolution processes: an instrumental and socio-emotional routes to reconciliation. In G. Salomon & B. Nevo (Eds.), Peace education worldwide: The concept, underlying principles, and research (pp. 127-143. Mawheh, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Nadler, A., & Liviatan, I. (2004). Intergroup reconciliation processes in Israel: Theoretical analysis and empirical findings. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt international perspectives (pp. 216-235. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Noor, M., Brown, R., & Prentice, G. (in press). Precursors and mediators of intergroup reconciliation in Northern Ireland. British Journal of Social Psychology.
31. Police Service for Northern Ireland (2005). Statistics, security situation and public order.
32. Report of the Chilean National Commission on Truth and Reconciliation (1993). US: Centre for Civil & Human Rights Notre Dame Law School, Vol. 1.
33. Roniger, L., & Sznajder, M. (1999). The legacy of human-rights violations in the Southern Cone. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Rosenberg, M. (1957). Occupation and values. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (1991). Measures of personality and social psychology attitudes. London: Academic Press, Inc.
35. Saiz, J.-L. (2002). Atribución de estereotipos: Los indígenas mapuches que perciben los chilenos. In J. F. Morales, D. Páez, A. L. Kornblit, & D. Asún. In Psicología social (pp. 145-151. Buenos Aires: Prentice Hall-Pearson Education.
36. Scobie, E. D., & Scobie, G. E. W. (1998). Damaging events: The perceived need for forgiveness. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 28, 373-401.
37. Shaw, M. (2003). War and genocide. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
38. Takaku, S., Weiner, B., & Ohbuchi, K. (2001). A cross-cultural examination of the effects of apology and perspective taking on forgiveness. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 20, 144-166.
39. Tangney, J. P. (1991). Moral affect: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 598-607.
40. Voci, A., & Hewstone, M. (2003). Contact & prejudice reduction in the Italian context: The impact of empathy, perspective-taking, and group salience. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Society for Experimental Social Psychology. Boston, MA.
41. Wohl, M. J. A., & Branscombe, N. R. (2005). Forgiveness and collective guilt assignment to historical perpetrator groups depend on level of social category inclusiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 288-303.