Characterizations of social-based and self-based contexts associated with students'awareness, evaluation,and regulation of their thinking during small-group mathematical modeling

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 486-520

  Magiera, Marta T ^a   Zawojewski, Judith S ^b  

^a MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Case study methods; Collaborative learning; High school, 9 12; Higher order thinking; Mathematical modeling; Metacognition; Social factors

Indexed keywords

EID: 81755162835     PISSN: 00218251     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5951/jresematheduc.42.5.0486     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. Baker, L., & Cerro, L. C. (2000). Assessing metacognition in children and adults. In G. Schraw & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 99-145). Lincoln, NE: Büros Institute of Mental Measurements, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
2. Boekaerts, M. (1999). Metacognitive experiences and motivational state as aspects of self-awareness: Review and discussion. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 571-584. doi:10.1007/ BF03172980
3. Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol.1, pp. 77-165). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Brown, A. L., Bransford, D. J., Ferrara, R. A., & Campione, J. C. (1983). Learning, remembering and understanding. In P. H. Müssen (Series Ed.), J. H. Flaveli, & E. M. Markman (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Cognitive development (4th ed., pp. 77-155). New York, NY: Wiley.
6. Cardelle-Elawar, M. (1990). Effects of feedback tailored to bilingual students' individual needs in mathematics word problems. The Elementary School Journal, 91,165-175. doi:10.1086/461644
7. Cardelle-Elawar, M. (1992). Effects of teaching metacognitive skills to students with low mathematics ability. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8, 109-121. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(92)90002-K
8. Cardelle-Elawar, M. (1995). Effects of metacognitive instruction on low achievers in mathematics problems. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11,81-95. doi: 10.1016/0742-051X(94)00019-3
9. Center for Research on Learning & Technology. (2001). Airplane contest. Retrieved from http://crlt. indiana.edu/research/csk.html
10. Center for Research on Learning & Technology. (2002). Phone plans. Retrieved from http://crlt. indiana.edu/research/csk.html
11. Center for Research on Learning & Technology. (2003). Case studies for kids. Retrieved from http://crlt. indiana.edu/research/csk.html
12. Center for Research on Learning & Technology, (n.d.a). Departing on time. Retrieved from http://crlt. indiana.edu/research/csk.html
13. Center for Research on Learning & Technology, (n.d.b). Summer jobs. Retrieved from http://crlt. indiana.edu/research/csk.html
14. De Grave, W. S., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Schmidt, H. G. (1996). Problem based learning: Cognitive and metacognitive processes during problem analysis. Instructional Science, 24, 321-341. doi: 10.1007/ BFOOl18111
15. Diefes-Dux, H. A., Hjalmarson, M., Bowman, K., & Zawojewski, J. S. (2006). Quantifying aluminum crystal size part 1: The model-eliciting activity. Journal of STEM Education, 7(1&2), 51-63.
16. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Flaveli, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-236). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Flaveli, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34,906-911. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
19. Flaveli, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 21-29). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Forman, E. (1989). The role of peer interactions in the social construction of mathematical knowledge. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 55-70.
21. Garofalo, J., & Lester, F. K., Jr. (1985). Metacognition, cognitive monitoring, and mathematical performance. Journalfor Research in Mathematics Education, 16, 163-176.
22. Goos, M., & Galbraith, P. (1996). Do it this way! Metacognitive strategies in collaborative mathematical problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30, 229-260. doi:10.1007/BF00304567 (Pubitemid 126054986)
23. Goos, M., Galbraith, P., & Renshaw, P. (2002). Socially mediated metacognition: Creating collaborative zones of proximal development in small group problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 193-223. doi: 10.1023/A: 1016209010120
24. liskala, T., Vauras, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Socially-shared metacognition in peer learning? Hellenic Journal of Psychology, I, 147-178.
25. Kapa, E. (2002). A metacognitive support during the process of problem solving in a computerized environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47,317-336. doi:10.1023/A:1015124013119
26. Kramarski, B., Mevarech, Z. R., & Arami, M. (2002). The effect of metacognitive instruction on solving mathematical authentic tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 225-250. doi:10.1023/A:1016282811724
27. Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. M. (2003). Foundations of a models and modeling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning, and problem solving. In R. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 3-33). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Lesh, R., Hoover, M., Hole, B., Kelly, A., & Post, T. (2000). Principles for developing thought-revealing activities for students and teachers. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 591-645). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Lesh, R., & Zawojewski, J. S. (1992). Problem solving. In T. R. Post (Ed.), Teaching mathematics in grades K-8: Research-based methods (pp. 49-88). Newton, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
30. Lesh, R., & Zawojewski, J. S. (2007). Problem solving and modeling. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 763-804). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
31. Lester, F. K., Jr. (1980). Problem solving: Is it a problem? In M. M. Lindquist (Ed.), Selected issues in mathematics education (pp. 29-45). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32. Lester, F. K., Jr. (1983). Trends and issues in mathematical problem solving research. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes. Developmental psychology series (pp. 229-261). New York, NY: Academic Press.
33. Lester, F. K., Jr., Garofalo, J., & Kroll, D. L. (1989). The role of metacognition in mathematical problem solving: A study of two grade seven classes (Final Report). Mathematics Education Development Center. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED314255).
34. Lester, F. K., Jr., & Kehle, P. E. (2003). From problem solving to modeling: The evolution of thinking about research on complex mathematical activity. In R. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving learning, and teaching (pp. 501-518). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. McCaslin, M., & Hickey, D. T. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A Vygotskian view. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 227-252). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Mevarech, Z., & Fridkin, S. (2006). The effects of IMPROVE on mathematical knowledge, mathematical reasoning and meta-cognition. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 85-97. doi:10.1007/s11409-006-6584-x (Pubitemid 44124103)
37. Mevarech, Z. R., & Kramarski, B. (1997). IMPROVE: A multidimensional method for teaching mathematics in heterogeneous classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 365-394. doi: 10.3102/00028312034002365
38. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39. Minichiello, V, Aroni, R., Timewell, E., & Alexander, L. (1990). In-depth interviewing: Researching people (2nd ed.). Melbourne, Australia: Longman Cheshire.
40. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41. Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42. Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26, 113-125. doi : 10.1023/A: 1003044231033
43. Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351-371. doi: 10.1007/BF02212307
44. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1983). Beyond the purely cognitive: Belief systems, social cognitions, and metacognitions as driving forces in intellectual performance. Cognitive Science, 7, 329-363. doi: 10.1207/ sl5516709cog0704-3
45. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
46. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). What's all the fuss about metacognition? In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 189-216). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334-370). New York, NY: Macmillan.
48. Silver, E. A. (1982). Knowledge organization and mathematical problem solving. In F. K. Lester Jr. & J. Garofalo (Eds.), Mathematical problem solving: Issues in research (pp. 15-23). Philadelphia, PA: Franklin Institute Press.
49. Sriraman, B. (2003). Mathematical giftedness, problem solving, and the ability to formulate general-izations: The problem-solving experiences of four gifted students. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 14, 151-165. doi:10.4219/jsge-2003-425
50. Stacey, K. (1992). Mathematical problem solving in groups: Are two heads better than one? Journal of Mathematical Behavior, II, 261-275.
51. Stillman, G. A., & Galbraith, P. L. (1998). Applying mathematics with real world connections: Metacognitive characteristics of secondary school students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36,157-195. doi: 10.1023/A: 1003246329257
52. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53. Swanson, H. L. (1990). Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82,306-314. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.2.306
54. Veenman, M. V J., van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning 1, 3-14. doi:10.1007/ si 1409-006-6893-0
55. Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E., Lasure, S., Van Vaerenbergh, G., Bogaerts, H., & Ratinckx, E. (1999). Learning to solve mathematical application problems: A design experiment with fifth graders. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1,195-229. doi:10.1207/s15327833mtl0103-2
56. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57. Whitebread, D., Bingham, S., Grau, V, Pino Pasternak, D. P., & Sangster, C. (2007). Development of metacognition and self-regulated learning in young children: Role of collaborative and peer-assisted learning. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 6(3), 433-455. doi:10.1891/ 194589507787382043
58. Wilson, J. (2001, December). Methodological difficulties for assessing metacognition: A new approach. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education International Education Research Conference, Fremantle, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.aare.edu.au/01 pap/wil01001 .htm
59. Wilson, J, & Clarke, D. (2002, April). Monitoring mathematical metacognition. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
60. Wilson, J., & Clarke, D. (2004). Towards the modelling of mathematical metacognition. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 16(2), 25-48. (Pubitemid 40055309)
61. Wood, T., Hjalmarson, M., & Williams, G. (2008). Chapter 10: Learning to design in small group mathematical modeling. In J. S. Zawojewski, H. A. Diefes-Dux, & K. J. Bowman (Eds.), Models and modeling in engineering education: Designing experiences for all students (pp. 187-212). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
62. Zan, R. (2000). A metacognitive intervention in mathematics at the university level. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(1), 143-150. doi:10.1080/002073900287462
63. Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman and D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1-37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Reflections on theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In B. J. Zimmerman and D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 273-292). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.