Relative faces: Encoding of family resemblance relative to gender means in face space

Journal of Vision

Volumn 11, Issue 12, 2011, Pages

  Griffin, Harry John ^a   McOwan, Peter William ^b   Johnston, Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Face recognition; Face space; Identity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; SEX DIFFERENCE;

FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEX FACTORS;

EID: 81555214665     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/11.12.8     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Baudouin, J. Y., & Gallay, M. (2006). Is face distinctiveness gender based? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 789-798.
2. Berisha, F., Johnston, A., & McOwan, P. W. (2010). Identifying regions that carry the best information about global facial configurations. Journal of Vision, 10(11):27, 1-8, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/11/27, doi:10.1167/10.11.27.
3. Bestelmeyer, P. E. G., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Perrett, D. I., Schneider, A., et al. (2008). Sex-contingent face aftereffects depend on perceptual category rather than structural encoding. Cognition, 107, 353-365.
4. Burton, A. M., Bruce, V., & Hancock, P. J. B. (1999). From pixels to people: A model of familiar face recognition. Cognitive Science, 23, 1-31.
5. Byatt, G., & Rhodes, G. (2004). Identification of own-race and other-race faces: Implications for the representation of race in face space. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 735-741.
6. Calder, A. J., Burton, A. M., Miller, P., Young, A. W., & Akamatsu, S. (2001). A principal component analysis of facial expressions. Vision Research, 41, 1179-1208.
7. Chance, J. E., Turner, A. L., & Goldstein, A. G. (1982). Development of differential recognition for own- and other-race faces. Journal of Psychology, 112, 29-37.
8. Chen, H. W., Russell, R., Nakayama, K., & Livingstone, M. (2010). Crossing the 'uncanny valley': Adaptation to cartoon faces can influence perception of human faces. Perception, 39, 378-386.
9. DeBruine, L. M., Smith, F. G., Jones, B. C., Roberts, S. C., Petrie, M., & Spector, T. D. (2009). Kin recognition signals in adult faces. Vision Research, 49, 38-43.
10. Freiwald, W. A., Tsao, D. Y., & Livingstone, M. S. (2009). A face feature space in the macaque temporal lobe. Nature Neuroscience, 12, 1187-1196.
11. Hancock, K. J., & Rhodes, G. (2008). Contact, configural coding and the other-race effect in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 45-56.
12. Jaquet, E., & Rhodes, G. (2008). Face aftereffects indicate dissociable, but not distinct, coding of male and female faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 101-112.
13. Jaquet, E., Rhodes, G., & Hayward, W. G. (2007). Opposite aftereffects for Chinese and Caucasian faces are selective for social category information and not just physical face differences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1457-1467.
14. Jaquet, E., Rhodes, G., & Hayward, W. G. (2008). Racecontingent aftereffects suggest distinct perceptual norms for difference race faces. Visual Cognition, 16, 734-753.
15. Jiang, F., Blanz, V., & O'Toole, A. J. (2006). Probing the visual representation of faces with adaptation-A view from the other side of the mean. Psychological Science, 17, 493-500.
16. Johnston, A., McOwan, P. W., & Benton, C. P. (1999). Robust velocity computation from a biologically motivated model of motion perception. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 266, 509-518.
17. Johnston, R. A., Milne, A. B., & Williams, C. (1997). Do distinctive faces come from outer space? An investigation of the status of multidimensional face-space. Visual Cognition, 4, 59-67.
18. Leopold, D. A., Bondar, I. V., & Giese, M. A. (2006). Norm-based face encoding by single neurons in the monkey inferotemporal cortex. Nature, 442, 572-575.
19. Leopold, D. A., O'Toole, A. J., Vetter, T., & Blanz, V. (2001). Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level after effects. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 89-94.
20. Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2005). Sexcontingent face after-effects suggest distinct neural populations code male and female faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272, 2283-2287.
21. Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., & Waitt, C. (2008). Category contingent aftereffects for faces of different races, ages and species. Cognition, 106, 1537-1547.
22. Maloney, L. T., & Dal Martello, M. F. (2006). Kin recognition and the perceived facial similarity of children. Journal of Vision, 6(10):4, 1047-1056, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/6/10/4, doi:10.1167/6.10.4.
23. McKone, E., Brewer, J. L., MacPherson, S., Rhodes, G., & Hayward, W. G. (2007). Familiar other-race faces show normal holistic processing and are robust to perceptual stress. Perception, 36, 224-248.
24. Rhodes, G., Jaquet, E., Jeffery, L., Evangelista, E., Keane, J., & Calder, A. J. (2011). Sex-specific norms code face identity. Journal of Vision, 11(1):1, 1-11, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/11/1/1, doi:10.1167/11.1.1.
25. Rhodes, G., & Jeffery, L. (2006). Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity. Vision Research, 46, 2977-2987.
26. Rhodes, G., Watson, T. L., Jeffery, L., & Clifford, C. W. (2010). Perceptual adaptation helps us identify faces. Vision Research, 50, 963-968.
27. Robbins, R., McKone, E., & Edwards, M. (2007). Aftereffects for face attributes with different natural variability: Adapter position effects and neural models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 570-592.
28. Sugase, Y., Yamane, S., Ueno, S., & Kawano, K. (1999). Global and fine information coded by single neurons in the temporal visual cortex. Nature, 400, 869-873.
29. Susilo, T., McKone, E., & Edwards, M. (2010). What shape are the neural response functions underlying opponent coding in face space? A psychophysical investigation. Vision Research, 50, 300-314.
30. Tanaka, J. W., & Pierce, L. J. (2009). The neural plasticity of other-race face recognition. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 122-131.
31. Troje, N. F., & Bulthoff, H. H. (1996). Face recognition under varying poses: The role of texture and shape. Vision Research, 36, 1761-1771.
32. Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 42, 161-204.
33. Wichmann, F. A., & Hill, N. J. (2001). The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1293-1313.