Identifying regions that carry the best information about global facial configurations

Journal of Vision

Volumn 10, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1-8

  Berisha, Fatos ^a   Johnston, Alan ^a   McOwan, Peter W ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bubbles; Face animation; Faces; Principal component analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FACIAL EXPRESSION; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

FACIAL EXPRESSION; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION;

EID: 78449258403     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/10.11.27     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Blanz, V., & Vetter, T. (1999). A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques.
2. Bonnar, L., Gosselin, F., & Schyns, P. G. (2002). Understanding Dali's slave market with the disappearing bust of Voltaire: A case study in the scale information driving perception. Perception, 31, 683-691.
3. Buchan, J. N., Pare, M., & Munhall, K. G. (2007). Spatial statistics of gaze fixations during dynamic face processing. Social Neuroscience, 2, 1-13.
4. Caldara, R., Schyns, P., Mayer, E., Smith, M. L., Gosselin, F., & Rossion, B. (2005). Does prosopagnosia take the eyes out of face representations? Evidence for a defect in representing diagnostic facial information following brain damage. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1652-1666.
5. Chauvin, A., Worsley, K. J., Schyns, P. G., Arguin, M., & Gosselin, F. (2005). Accurate statistical tests for smooth classification images. Journal of Vision, 5(9):1, 659-667, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/5/9/1, doi:10.1167/5.9.1.
6. Cowe, G. A. (2003). Example-based computer-generated facial mimicry. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University College London, London.
7. Cunningham, D. W., & Wallraven, C. (2009). Dynamic information for the recognition of conversational expressions. Journal of Vision, 9(13):7, 1-17, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/13/7, doi:10.1167/9.13.7.
8. Davies, G., Ellis, H., & Shepherd, J. (1977). Cue saliency in faces as assessed by the "Photofit" technique. Perception, 6, 263-269.
9. Dupuis-Roy, N., Fortin, I., Fiset, D., & Gosselin, F. (2009). Uncovering gender discrimination cues in a realistic setting. Journal of Vision, 9(2):10, 11-18, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/2/10, doi:10.1167/9.2.10.
10. Gibson, B. M., Wasserman, E. A., Gosselin, F., & Schyns, P. G. (2005). Applying bubbles to localize features that control pigeons' visual discrimination behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 31, 376-382.
11. Gosselin, F., & Schyns, P. G. (2001). Bubbles: A technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks. Vision Research, 41, 2261-2271.
12. Haig, N. D. (1985). How faces differ-A new comparative technique. Perception, 14, 601-615.
13. Hill, H., & Johnston, A. (2001). Categorizing sex and identity from the biological motion of faces. Current Biology, 11, 880-885.
14. Humphreys, K., Gosselin, F., Schyns, P. G., & Johnson, M. H. (2006). Using "Bubbles" with babies: A new technique for investigating the informational basis of infant perception. Infant Behavior and Development, 29, 471-475.
15. Johnston, A. (1992). Object constancy in face processing: Intermediate representations and object forms. Irish Journal of Psychology, 13, 425-438.
16. Johnston, A. (in press). Movement: A foundation for facial representation. In C. Curio, M. Giese, & H. H. Bulthoff (Eds.), Dynamic faces: Insights from experiments and computation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Johnston, A., McOwan, P. W., & Benton, C. P. (1999). Robust velocity computation from a biologically motivated model of motion perception. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 266, 509-518.
18. Johnston, A., McOwan, P. W., & Buxton, H. (1992). A computational model of the analysis of some first-order and second-order motion patterns by simple and complex cells. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 250, 297-306.
19. Knight, B., & Johnston, A. (1997). The role of movement in face recognition. Visual Cognition, 4, 265-273.
20. Lander, K., Christie, F., & Bruce, V. (1999). The role of movement in the recognition of famous faces. Memory and Cognition, 27, 974-985.
21. Leopold, D. A., Bondar, I. V., & Giese, M. A. (2006). Norm-based face encoding by single neurons in the monkey inferotemporal cortex. Nature, 442, 572-575.
22. Leopold, D. A., O'Toole, A. J., Vetter, T., & Blanz, V. (2001). Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 89-94.
23. McCotter, M., Gosselin, F., Sowden, P., & Schyns, P. (2005). The use of visual information in natural scenes. Visual Cognition, 12, 938-953.
24. O'Toole, A. J., Roark, D. A., & Abdi, H. (2002). Recognizing moving faces: A psychological and neural synthesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 261-266.
25. Rhodes, G., Brennan, S., & Carey, S. (1987). Identification and ratings of caricatures: Implications for mental representations of faces. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 473-497.
26. Schyns, P. G., Bonnar, L., & Gosselin, F. (2002). Show me the features! Understanding recognition from the use of visual information. Psychological Science, 13, 402-409.
27. Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 43, 161-204.
28. Vinette, C., Gosselin, F., & Schyns, P. (2004). Spatiotemporal dynamics of face recognition in a flash: It's in the eyes. Cognitive Science, 28, 289-301.