Evaluating E-learning

International Encyclopedia of Education

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 530-538

  Williams, D D ^a   Graham, C R ^a  

^a BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Distance education; E learning; Evaluation; Internet communication; Online learning; Online systems; Personal learning environments; Social networks; Stakeholders; Technology; World wide web

Indexed keywords

EID: 81455136356     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01643-2     Document Type: Chapter

References (56)

1. SCORM 2004 2004, Advanced Distributive Learning, (accessed August 2009). http://www.adlnet.gov/scorm/index.aspx, 3rd edn.
2. AEA Response to US Department of Education on Scientifically Based Evaluation Methods 2003, AEA (American Evaluation Association), (accessed August 2009). http://www.eval.org/doestatement.htm.
3. American Evaluation Association Guiding Principles for Evaluators 2004, AEA (American Evaluation Association), (accessed August 2009). http://www.eval.org/GPTraining/GPTrainingOverview.asp.
4. Letter to US Department of Education on Scientifically Based Evaluation Methods 2003, AERA (American Educational Research Association), (accessed August 2009). http://www.eval.org/doeaera.htm.
5. Allen I.E., Seaman J. Online Nation: Five Years of Growth in Online Learning 2007, Sloan-C, Needham, MA.
6. The E-Learning Handbook 2008, Pfeiffer, San Francisco, CA. S. Carliner, P. Shank (Eds.).
7. Clifford L. Learner Experiences of E-Learning (accessed August 2009). http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/elearningpedagogy/learnerxp.as px.
8. Cousins J.G., Whitmore E. Framing participatory evaluation. Understanding and Practicing Participatory Evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, No. 80 1998, 5-23. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. E. Whitmore (Ed.).
9. Graham C.R. Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs 2006, 3-21. Pfeiffer, San Francisco, CA. C.J. Bonk, C.R. Graham (Eds.).
10. Standards for Reading Professionals International Reading Association. http://www.reading.org/downloads/resources/545standards2003/index.html.
11. Ito M., Horst H., Bittanti M., et al. Living and Learning with New Media: Summary of Findings from the Digital Youth Project 2008, MacArthur Foundation, Chicago, IL, (accessed August 2009). http://digitalyouth.ischool.berkeley.edu/report.
12. Khribi M.K., Jemni M., Nasraoui O. Automatic recommendations for e-learning personalization based on web usage mining techniques and information retrieval 2008, 241-245. IEEE Computer Society, (accessed August 2009). http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1381543&jmp=cit&coll=& dl=.
13. Koehler M.J., Mishra P. Introducing TPCK. Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for Educators 2008, 3-29. Routledge, New York, In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (ed.).
14. Lorenzo G., Moore J. The Sloan Consortium Report to the Nation: Five Pillars of Quality Online Education (accessed August 2009). http://www.aln.org/effective/pillarreport1.pdf.
15. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, (accessed August 2009). http://standards.nctm.org.
16. Oblinger D.G., Hawkins B.L. The myth about no significant difference "using technology produces no significant difference.". EDUCAUSE Review 2006, 41(6). (accessed August 2009). http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Review/EDUCAUSEReviewMagazineVolume41/T heMythaboutNoSignificantDiffe/158103.
17. Rooney J.E. Blending learning opportunities to enhance educational programming and meetings. Association Management 2003, 55(5):26-32.
18. Sanders J.R. The Program Evaluation Standards: How to Assess Evaluations of Educational Programs 1994, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
19. Stufflebeam D.L. Program evaluations metaevaluation checklist (accessed August 2009). http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/checklists/program_metaeval_10point.htm.
20. Wesch M. Human futures for technology and education 2007, (accessed August 2009). http://www.educause.edu/ECAR/HumanFuturesforTechnologyandEd/161880.
21. WestEd D.D. Evaluating Online Learning: Challenges and Strategies for Success (accessed August 2009). http://www.wested.org/cs/we/view/rs/890.
22. Williams Measurement and assessment supporting evaluation in online settings. Online Assessment, Measurement and Evaluation: Emerging Practices 2006, 1-9. Idea Group, Hershey, PA. D.D. Williams, M. Hricko, S. Howell (Eds.).
23. Williams D.D., Campbell J.O. Effectiveness of e-learning instruction and of evaluations of e-learning 2001, (accessed August 2009).
24. Young J.R. Hybrid' teaching seeks to end the divide between traditional and online instruction. Chronicle of Higher Education 2002, A33. (accessed August 2009). http://chronicle.com/weekly/v48/i28/28a03301.htm.
25. Ardito C., Costabile M.F., Marsico M.D., et al. An approach to usability evaluation of e-learning applications. Universal Access in the Information Society 2006, 4(3):270-283.
26. Arthur W., Bennett W., Edens P.S., Bell S.T. Effectiveness of training in organizations: A meta-analysis of design and evaluation features. Journal of Applied Psychology 2003, 88(2):234-245.
27. Evaluating E-Learning: A Guide to the Evaluation of E-Learning 2006, (accessed August 2009). http://www.pontydysgu.org/2007/11/evaluating-e-learning, G. Attwell (Ed.).
28. Bernard R.M., Abrami P.C., Lou Y., et al. How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research 2004, 74(3):379-439.
29. Boettcher J.V., Justice L., Schenk K., Rogers P.L., Berg G.A. Encyclopedia of Distance Learning 2005, IGI Global, Hershey, PA.
30. Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs 2006, Pfeiffer, San Francisco, CA. C.J. Bonk, C.R. Graham (Eds.).
31. Britain S., Liber O. A framework for the pedagogical evaluation of elearning environments (accessed August 2009). http://www.jisc.ac.uk/index.cfm?name=project_elearn_ped_learning_design_ tools.
32. Chen C.L. Development. E-Learning Concepts and Techniques 2006, (accessed August 2009). http://iit.bloomu.edu/Spring2006_eBook_files/index.htm, P. Berman (Ed.).
33. Clark D. Psychological myths in e-learning. Medical Teacher 2002, 24(6):598-604.
34. Cochrane T. Learning with wireless mobile devices and social software. Whose Technology? 2006, 143. (accessed August 2009). http://64.233.179.104/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=cache:2Fz5qswaIhcJ:asc ilite.org.au/conferences/sydney06/proceeding/pdf_papers/p50.pdf+social+m edia+learning+evaluation.
35. Corte E.D., Verschaffel L., Entwistle N., Merrienboer J.V. Powerful Learning Environments 2003, Elsevier, Oxford, UK.
36. Farmer B., Yue A., Brooks C. Using blogging for higher order learning in large cohort university teaching: A case study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 2008, 24(2):123-136. (accessed August 2009). http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet24/farmer.html.
37. Various Evaluation Standards Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation, (accessed August 2009). http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/jc.
38. Lam P., McNaught C. Management of an e-learning evaluation project: e3learning 2005, 2261-2268.
39. McNaught C., Lam P. Building an evaluation culture and evidence base for e-learning in three Hong Kong universities. British Journal of Educational Technology 2005, 36(4):599-614.
40. Handbook of Distance Education 2003, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. M.G. Moore, W.G. Anderson (Eds.).
41. Reeves T.C. Keys to successful e-learning: Outcomes, assessment, and evaluation. Educational Technology 2002, 42(6):23-29.
42. Ruiz J.G., Mintzer M.J., Leipzig R.M. The impact of e-learning in medical education. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 2006, 81(3):207-212.
43. Sitzmann T., Kraiger K., Stewart D., Wisher R. The comparative effectiveness of web-based and classroom instruction: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 2006, 59(3):623-664.
44. Waight C.L., Willging P.A., Wentling T.L. Recurrent themes in e-learning: A meta-analysis of major e-learning reports (accessed August 2009). http://learning.ncsa.uiuc.edu/papers/AHRD2002_waight-willging-wentling.p df.
45. Welsh E.T., Wanberg C.R., Brown K.G., Simmering M.J. E-learning: Emerging uses, empirical results and future directions. International Journal of Training and Development 2003, 7(4):245-258.
46. Wiecha J.M., Gramling R., Joachim P., Vanderschmidt H. Collaborative e-learning using streaming video and asynchronous discussion boards to teach the cognitive foundation of medical interviewing: A case study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2003, 5(2):e13.
47. Online Assessment, Measurement and Evaluation: Emerging Practices 2006, Idea Group, Hershey, PA. D.D. Williams, M. Hricko, S. Howell (Eds.).
48. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), with information on e-learning and related topics. http://blogs.aace.org.
49. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, International Journal on E-Learning. http://www.aace.org.
50. Brightcove, Wired Campus TV. http://link.brightcove.com.
51. Chronicle's Wired Campus Newsletter; Chronicle of Higher Education Information Technology. http://chronicle.com/blog/Wired-Campus/5.
52. Online Journals, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET). http://online-journals.org/i-jet.
53. Shambles, Training Evaluation. http://www.shambles.net.
54. Southern Regional Educational Board, Educational Technology Cooperative. http://www.sreb.org.
55. Videos on Personal Learning Environments. http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=personal+learning+environments%26i e=utf-8%26oe=utf-8%26rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official%26client=firefox-a%2 6um=1%26sa=X%26oi=video_result_group%26resnum=4%26ct=title%23.
56. http://www.inacol.org/research/nationalstandards/.