Comparative genomic analysis using information theory

Recent Advances In Biostatistics: False Discovery Rates, Survival Analysis, And Related Topics

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 223-245

  Fatakia, Sarosh N ^a   Costanzi, Stefano ^a   Chow, Carson C ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 81455126886     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (36)

1. E. Lander, L. Linton, B. Birren, C. Nusbaum, M. Zody, J. Baldwin, K. Devon, K. Dewar, et al., Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome, Nature . 409(6822), 860-921, (2001).
2. J. Craig Venter, M. Adams, E. Myers, P. Li, R. Mural, G. Sutton, H. Smith, M. Yandell, et al., The sequence of the human genome, Science . 291(5507), 1304-1351, (2001).
3. R. Doolittle, Similar amino acid sequences: Chance or common ancestry?, Science . 214(4517), 149-159, (1981).
4. R. Doolittle, Similar amino acid sequences revisited, Trends in Biochemical Sciences . 14(7), 244-245, (1989).
5. A. Lesk, Ed., Computational molecular biology: sources and methods for sequence analysis.
6. M. Kimura, Ed., The neutral theory of molecular evolution.
7. C. Chothia and A. Lesk, The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins., The EMBO journal . 5(4), 823-826, (1986).
8. C. Chothia and M. Gerstein, How far can sequences diverge?, Nature. 385 (6617), (1997).
9. R. Russell, M. Saqi, R. Sayle, P. Bates, and M. Sternberg, Recognition of analogous and homologous protein folds: Analysis of sequence and structure conservation, Journal of Molecular Biology . 269(3), 423-439, (1997).
10. B. Rost, Protein structures sustain evolutionary drift, Folding and Design . 2 (3), S19-S24, (1997).
11. T. Wood and W. Pearson, Evolution of protein sequences and structures, Journal of Molecular Biology . 291(4), 977-995, (1999).
12. C. Chothia and J. Gough, Genomic and structural aspects of protein evolution, Biochemical Journal . 419(1), 15-28, (2009).
13. R. Fredriksson, M. Lagerstrom, and H. Schioth, Expansion of the superfamily of g-protein-coupled receptors in chordates, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences . 1040, 89-94, (2005).
14. D. Perez, From plants to man: The gpcr.
15. D. Perez, Fredriksson, and Schioth, Erratum: From plants to man: The gpcr ’tree of life’ (molecular pharmacology (2005) 67 (1383-1384)), Molecular Pharmacology . 67(6), 2185, (2005).
16. H. Rompler, C. Staubert, D. Thor, A. Schulz, M. Hofreiter, and T. Schoneberg, G protein-coupled time travel: Evolutionary aspects of gpcr research, Molecular Interventions . 7(1), 17-25, (2007).
17. W. Fitch and E. Markowitz, An improved method for determining codon variability in a gene and its application to the rate of fixation of mutations in evolution, Biochemical Genetics . 4(5), 579-593, (1970).
18. S. Chakrabarti and A. Panchenko, Structural and functional roles of coevolved sites in proteins, PLoS ONE . 5(1), (2010).
19. F. Pazos and A. Valencia, Protein co-evolution, co-adaptation and interactions, EMBO Journal . 27(20), 2648-2655, (2008).
20. S. N. Fatakia, S. Costanzi, and C. C. Chow, Computing highly correlated positions using mutual information and graph theory for g protein-coupled receptors, PLoS ONE. 4(3), (2009).
21. W. Gehring, M. Affolter, and T. Burglin, Homeodomain proteins, Annual Review of Biochemistry . 63, 487-526, (1994).
22. W. Gehring, The homeobox in perspective, Trends in Biochemical Sciences . 17(8), 277-280, (1992).
23. J.-S. Surgand, J. Rodrigo, E. Kellenberger, and D. Rognan, A chemogenomic analysis of the transmembrane binding cavity of human g-protein-coupled receptors, Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics. 62(2), 509-538, (2006). http://lbm.niddk.nih.gov/s.fatakia/dir_msa/dir_gpcr/dir_surgand_rognan/ totaLalignment.fasta.
24. J. Ballesteros and H. Weinstein, Integrated methods for the construction of three-dimensional models and computational probing of structure-function relations in g protein-coupled receptors, Methods Neurosci . 25, 366-428, 1995).
25. G. Gloor, L. Martin, L. Wahl, and S. Dunn, Mutual information in protein multiple sequence alignments reveals two classes of coevolving positions, Biochemistry. 44(19), 7156-7165, (2005). http://cjelli.biochem.fmd.uwo.ca/'^'00loor/hd_new/nox_hd_90.fasta.
26. C. Shannon, A mathematical theory of communication, Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379-423, (1948).
27. T. Cover and J. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory. (Wiley, New York). http://www.rcsb.org/.
28. L. Mirny and M. Gelfand, Using orthologous and paralogous proteins to identify specificity-determining residues in bacterial transcription factors.
29. 2+ receptor converts a negative allosteric modulator into a positive allosteric modulator, Journal of Biological Chemistry . 281 (30), 21558-21565, (2006).
30. E. Fraenkel and C. Pabo, Comparison of x-ray and nmr structures for the antennapedia homeodomain- dna complex, Nature Structural Biology . 5(8), 692-697, (1998).
31. A. Delia, G. Tell, I. Paron, L. Pellizzari, R. Lonigro, and G. Damante, Mis-sense mutations of human homeoboxes: A review, Human Mutation . 18(5), 361-374, (2001).
32. A. D’Elia, G. Tell, I. Paron, L. Pellizzari, G. Damante, Erratum: Missense mutations of human homeoboxes: A review (human mutation (2001) 18 (361-374)), Human Mutation . 19(4), 457, (2002).
33. O. Noivirt, M. Eisenstein, and A. Horovitz, Detection and reduction of evolutionary noise in correlated mutation analysis, Protein Engineering, Design and Selection . 18(5), 247-253, (2005).
34. K. Wollenberg and W. Atchley, Separation of phylogenetic and functional associations in biological sequences by using the parametric bootstrap, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 97(7), 3288-3291, (2000).
35. D. Jones, W. Taylor, and J. Thornton, The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences, Computer Applications in the Biosciences . 8(3), 275-282, (1992).
36. L. Martin, G. Gloor, S. Dunn, and L. Wahl, Using information theory to search for co-evolving residues in proteins, Bioinformatics. 21(22), 4116-4124, (2005)