Sexual polymorphisms in Narcissus triandrus (Amaryllidaceae): Is this species tristylous?

Heredity

Volumn 78, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 135-145

  Barrett, Spencer C H ^a   Cole, William W ^a   Arroyo, Juan ^b   Cruzan, Mitchell B ^c   Lloyd, David G ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

late acting self sterility; Narcissus triandrus; outcrossing rates; sexual polymorphism; tristyly

Indexed keywords

AMARYLLIDACEAE; LYTHRACEAE; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; NARCISSUS TRIANDRUS; OXALIDACEAE; PONTEDERIACEAE;

EID: 0031042469     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1997.21     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. BARRETT, S. C. H. 1988. The evolution, maintenance, and loss of self-incompatibility systems. In: Lovett Doust, J. and Lovett Doust, L. (eds) Plant Reproductive Ecology. Patterns and Strategies, pp. 98-124. Oxford University Press, New York.
2. BARRETT, S. C. H. 1993. The evolutionary biology of tristyly. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, 9, 283-286.
3. BARRETT, S. C. H. AND CRUZAN, M. B. 1994. Incompatibility in heterostylous plants. In: Williams, E. G., Knox, R. B. and Clark, A. E. (eds) Genetic Control of Incompatibility and Reproductive Development in Flowering Plants, pp. 189-219. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
4. BARRETT, S. C. H., LLOYD, D. G. AND ARROYO, J. 1996. Stylar polymorphisms and the evolution of heterostyly in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). In: Lloyd, D. G. and Barrett, S. C. H. (eds) Floral Biology: Studies on Floral Evolution in Animal-Pollinated Plants, pp. 339-376. Chapman & Hall, New York.
5. BATEMAN, A. J. 1952. Trimorphism and self-incompatibility in Narcissus, Nature, 170, 496-497.
6. BATEMAN, A. J. 1954. The genetics of Narcissus. I. Sterility. Daffodil and Tulip Year Book, 19, 23-29. Royal Horticultural Society, London.
7. BLANCHARD, J. W. 1990. Narcissus: A Guide to Wild Daffodils. Alpine Garden Society, Woking, Surrey, U.K.
8. CHARLESWORTH, D. 1979. The evolution and breakdown of tristyly. Evolution, 33, 486-498.
9. DULBERGER, R. 1964. Flower dimorphism and self-incompatibility in Narcissus tazetta L. Evolution, 18, 361-363.
10. DULBERGER, R. 1970. Floral dimorphism in Anchusa hybrida Ten. Isr. J. Bot., 19, 37-41.
11. ECKERT, C. G. AND BARRETT, S. C. H. 1994. Tristyly, Self-compatibility and floral variation in Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 53, 1-30.
12. FERNANDES, A. 1935. Remarque sur l'hétérostylie de Narcissus triandrus et de N. reflexus. Bol. Soc. Brot., Sér. 2, 10, 5-15.
13. FERNANDES, A. 1965. Contribution à la connaissance de la génétique de l'hétérostylie chez le genre Narcissus L. II. L'hétérostylie chez quelques populations de N. triandrus var. cernuus et N. triandrus var concolor. Genét. Ibérica, 17, 215-239.
14. GRAHAM, S. W. AND BARRETT, S. C. H. 1995. Phylogenetic systematics of Pontederiales: Implications for breeding-system evolution. In: Rudall, P. J., Cribb, P. J., Cutler, D. F. and Humphries, C. J. (eds) Monocotyledons: Systematics and Evolution, pp. 415-441. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
15. HENRIQUES, J. A. 1887. Observações sobre algumas especies de Narcissus, encontrados em Portugal. Bol. Soc. Brot., 5, 168-174.
16. KOHN, J. R. AND BARRETT, S. C. H. 1992. Experimental studies on the functional significance of heterostyly. Evolution, 46, 43-55.
17. KREBS, S. L. AND HANCOCK, J. F. 1990. Early acting inbreeding depression and reproductive success in the highbush blueberry Vaccinium corymbosum (Ericaceae). Theor. Appl. Gen., 79, 825-832.
18. LEMMENS, R. H. M. J. 1989. Heterostyly. In: Jongkind, C. C. H. and Lemmens, R. H. M. J. (eds) The Connaraceae, a Taxonomic Study with Emphasis on Africa, pp. 56-69. Agricultural University of Wageningen Papers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
19. LLOYD, D. G. AND WEBB, C. J. 1992. The evolution of heterostyly. In: Barrett, S. C. H. (ed.) Evolution and Function of Heterostyly, pp. 151-178. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
20. LLOYD, D. G., WEBB, C. J. AND DULBERGER, R. 1990. Heterostyly in species of Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae) and Hugonia (Linaceae) and other disputed cases. Pl. Syst. Evol., 172, 215-227.
21. NETTANCOURT, D. DE 1977. Incompatibility in Angiosperms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
22. RITLAND, K. 1990. A Series of FORTRAN computer programs for estimating plant mating systems. J. Hered., 81, 235-237.
23. SAS INSTITUTE INC. 1988. SAS/STAT® User's Guide, Release 6.03 edn. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
24. SCHOU, O. AND PHILIPP, M. 1984. An unusual heteromorphic incompatibility system. III. On the genetic control of distyly and self-incompatibility in Anchusa officinalis L. Theor. Appl. Genet., 68, 139-144.
25. SEAVEY, S. R. AND BAWA, K. S. 1986. Late-acting self-incompatibility in angiosperms. Bot. Rev., 52, 195-219.
26. SEAVEY, S. R. AND CARTER, S. K. 1994. Self-sterility in Epilobium obcordatum (Onagraceae). Am. J. Bot., 81, 331-338.
27. SIDÁK, Z. 1967. Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. J. Am. Stat. Ass., 62, 626-633.
28. THOMPSON, J. D., PAILLER, T., STRASBERG, D. AND MANICACCI, D. 1996. Tristyly in the endangered Mascarene Island endemic Hugonia serrata (Linaceae). Am. J. Bot., 83, 1160-1168.
29. WASER, N. M. AND PRICE, M. V. 1991. Reproductive costs of self-pollination in Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae): are ovules usurped? Am. J. Bot., 78, 1036-1043.
30. ZAVADA, M. S. AND LOWREY, T. K. 1995. Floral heteromorphism in Dais cotinifolia L. (Thymelaeaceae): a possible case of heterostyly. Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Paris Ser. 17 Section B, Adansonia nos. 1-2, 11-20.