Evolution and maintenance of stigma-height dimorphism in Narcissus. I. Floral variation and style-morph ratios

Heredity

Volumn 84, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 502-513

  Baker, Angela M ^a   Thompson, John D ^b   Barrett, Spencer C H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Amaryllidaceae; Disassortative mating; Heterostyly; Morph ratios; Population size; Stigma height dimorphism

Indexed keywords

ANTHER; DIMORPHISM; FLOWER; FRANCE; HETEROSTYLY; MATING SYSTEM; MORPHOLOGY; STAMEN; STIGMA; STYLE;

EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FLORAL TRAIT; POLYMORPHISM;

BODY CONSTITUTION; EVOLUTION; PLANTS; POLLEN; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; VARIATION (GENETICS);

AMARYLLIDACEAE; INSECTA; NARCISSUS; NARCISSUS ASSOANUS; NARCISSUS DUBIUS;

EID: 0033948315     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00651.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. ARROYO, J. AND DAFNI, A. 1995. Variation in habitat, season, flower traits, and pollinators in dimorphic Narcissus tazetta L. (Amaryllidaceae) in Israel. New Phytol., 129, 135-145.
2. ARROYO, J. AND BARRETT, S. C. H. 2000. Discovery of distyly in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). American Journal of Botany, in press.
3. BAKER, A. M., THOMPSON, J. D. AND BARRETT, S. C. H. 2000. The evolution and maintenance of stigma-height dimorphism in Narcissus. II. Fitness comparisons between style morphs. Heredity, 84, in press.
4. BARRETT, S. C. H. (ed.) 1992. Evolution and Function of Heterostyly. Springer, Berlin.
5. BARRETT, S. C. H. AND RICHARDS, J. H. 1990. Heterostyly in tropical plants. Mem. N. Y. Bot. Gard., 55, 35-61.
6. BARRETT, S. C. H., LLOYD, D. G. AND ARROYO, J. 1996. Stylar polymorphisms and the evolution of heterostyly in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). In: Lloyd, D. G. and Barrett, S. C. H. (eds) Floral Biology. Studies on Floral Evolution in Animal-Pollinated Plants, pp. 339-376. Chapman & Hall, New York.
7. BARRETT, S. C. H., COLE, W. W., ARROYO, J., CRUZAN, M. B. AND LLOYD, D. G. 1997. Sexual polymorphisms in Narcissus triandrus (Amaryllidaceae): is this species tristylous? Heredity, 78, 135-145.
8. BARRETT, S. C. H., JESSON, L. K. AND BAKER, A. M. 2000a. The evolution and function of stylar polymorphisms in flowering plants. Annals of Botany, in press.
9. BARRETT, S. C. H., BAKER, A. M. AND JESSON, L. K. 2000b. Mating strategies in monocotyledons. In: Wilson, K. L. and Morrison, D. (eds) Systematics and Evolution of Monocots, pp. 56-267. CSIRO Publishing, Australia.
10. BELAOUSSOFF, S. AND SHORE, J. S. 1995. Floral correlates and fitness consequences of mating-system variation in Turnera ulmifolia. Evolution, 49, 545-556.
11. CHARLESWORTH, D. AND CHARLESWORTH, B. 1979. A model for the evolution of distyly. Am. Nat., 114, 467-498.
12. DARWIN, C. 1877. The Different Forms of Flowers on Plants of the Same Species. Reprinted in 1986. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
13. DULBERGER, R. 1964. Floral dimorphism and self-incompatibility in Narcissus tazetta L. Evolution, 18, 361-363.
14. DULBERGER, R. 1970. Floral dimorphism in Anchusa hybrida Ten. Isr. J. Bot., 19, 37-41.
15. DULBERGER, R. 1992. Floral polymorphisms and their functional significance in the heterostylous syndrome. In: Barrett, S. C. H. (ed.) Evolution und Function of Heterostyly, pp. 41-84. Springer, Berlin.
16. ECKERT, C. G. AND BARRETT, S. C. H. 1993. The inheritance of tristyly in Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae). Heredity, 71, 473-480.
17. GANDERS, F. R. 1979. The biology of heterostyly. N. Z. J. Bot., 17, 607-635.
18. JERNSTEDT, J. A. 1982. Floral variation in Chlorogalum angustifolium (Liliaceae). Madroño, 29, 87-94.
19. LLOYD, D. G. AND WEBB, C. J. 1992a. The evolution of heterostyly. In: Barrett, S. C. H. (ed.) Evolution and Function of Heterostyly, pp. 151-178. Springer, Berlin.
20. LLOYD, D. G. AND WEBB, C. J. 1992b. The selection of heterostyly. In: Barrett, S. C. H. (ed.) Evolution ami Function of Heterostyly, pp. 179-207. Springer, Berlin.
21. O'BRIEN, S. P. AND CALDER, D. M. 1989. The breeding biology of Epacris impressa: Is this species heterostylous? Aust. J. Bot., 37, 43-54.
22. PHILIPP, M. AND SCHOU, O. 1981. An unusual heteromorphic incompatibility system: Distyly, self-incompatibility, pollen load, and fecundity in Anchusa officinalis (Boraginaceae). New Phytol., 89, 693-703.
23. RICHARDS, A. J. 1986. Plant Breeding Systems, 1st edn. Allen & Unwin, London.
24. RICHARDS, A. J. 1997. Plant Breeding Systems, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, London.
25. RICHARDS, A. J. 1998. Lethal linkage and its role in the evolution of plant breeding systems. In: Owens, S. J. and Rudall, P. J. (eds) Reproductive Biology in Systematics, Conservation and Economic Botany, pp. 71-83. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
26. SAGE, T. L., STRUMAS, F., COLE, W. W. AND BARRETT, S. C. H. 1999. Differential ovule development following self-and cross-pollination in Narcissus triandrus (Amaryllidaceae). Am. J. Bot., 86, 855-870.
27. SAS 1994. JMP Users Guide, version 3.0.2. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
28. SCHEMSKE, D. W., WILLSON, M. K. MELAMPY, M. N., MILLER, L. J., VERNIER, L., SCHEMSKE, K. M. AND BEST, L. B. 1978. Flowering ecology of some spring woodland herbs. Ecology, 59, 351-366.
29. SCHOU, O. AND PHILIPP, M. 1984. An unusual heteromorphic incompatibility system 3. On the genetic control of distyly and self-incompatibility in Anchusa officinalis L. (Boraginaceae). Theor. Appl. Genet., 68, 139-144.
30. SHORE, J. S. AND BARRETT, S. C. H. 1985. The genetics of distyly and homostyly in Turnera ulmifolia L. (Turneraceae). Heredity, 55, 167-174.
31. SOKAL, R. R. AND ROHLF, F. J. 1995. Biometry, 3rd edn. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
32. WEBB, C. J. AND LLOYD, D. G. 1986. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. II. Herkogamy. N. Z. J. Bot., 24, 163-178.