Integrating the dynamics of personality and close relationship processes: Methodological and data analytic implications

Journal of Personality

Volumn 79, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1403-1439

  Graber, Elana C ^a   Laurenceau, Jean Philippe ^a   Carver, Charles S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGY; REVIEW; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SYSTEMS THEORY;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SYSTEMS THEORY;

EID: 81355148512     PISSN: 00223506     EISSN: 14676494     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00725.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Asendorpf, J. B. (2002). Personality effects on personal relationships over the life span. In A. L. Vangelisti, H. T. Reis, & M. A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Stability and change in relationships (pp. 35-56). New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Atkins, D. C., & Gallop, R. J. (2007). Rethinking how family researchers model infrequent outcomes: A tutorial on count regression and zero-inflated models. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 726-735.
3. Bisconti, T. L., Bergeman, C. S., & Boker, S. M. (2006). Social support as a predictor of variability: An examination of recent widows' adjustment trajectories. Psychology and Aging, 21, 590-599.
4. Boker, S. M. (2002). Consequences of continuity: The hunt for intrinsic properties within parameters of dynamics in psychological processes. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37, 405-422.
5. Boker, S. M., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2006). Dynamical systems modeling: An application to the regulation of the intimacy and disclosure in marriage. In T. A. Walls & J. L. Schafer (Eds.), Models for intensive longitudinal data (p. 195-218). New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579-616.
7. Bolger, N., & Romero-Canyas, R. (2007). Integrating personality traits and processes: Framework, method, analysis, results. In Y. Shoda, D. Cervone, & G. Downey (Eds.), Persons in context: Building a science of the individual (pp. 201-210). New York: Guilford Press.
8. Cacioppo, J., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1999). The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 839-855.
9. Carver, C. S. (2001). Affect and the functional bases of behavior: On the dimensional structure of affective experience. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 345-356.
10. Carver, C. S. (2004). Negative affects deriving from the behavioral approach system. Emotion, 4, 3-22.
11. Carver, C. S., Avivi, Y. E., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2008). Approach, avoidance, and emotional experiences. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 385-397). New York: Psychology Press.
12. Carver, C. S., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 183-204.
13. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97, 19-35.
14. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Cervone, D., Shoda, Y., & Downey, G. (2007). Construing persons in context: On building a science of the individual. In Y. Shoda, D. Cervone, & G. Downey (Eds.), Persons in context: Building a science of the individual (pp. 3-15). New York: Guilford Press.
16. Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558-577.
17. Cooper, M. L. (2002). Personality and close relationships: Embedding people in important social contexts. Journal of Personality, 70, 757-782.
18. Cooper, M. L., & Sheldon, M. S. (2002). Seventy years of research on personality and close relationships: Substantive and methodological trends over time. Journal of Personality, 70, 783-812.
19. Ferrer, E., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2003). Modeling affective processes in dyadic relations via dynamic factor analysis. Emotion, 3, 344-360.
20. Fleeson, W. (2007). Studying personality processes: Explaining change in between-persons longitudinal and within-person multilevel models. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 523-542). New York: Guilford Press.
21. Fleeson, W., & Noftle, E. E. (2009). In favor of the synthetic resolution to the person-situation debate. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 150-154.
22. Fowers, B. J., & Owenz, M. B. (2010). A eudaimonic theory of marital quality. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 2, 334-352.
23. Fowles, D. (1994). A motivational theory of psychopathology. In W. Spaulding (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Integrated views of motivation and emotion (Vol. 41, pp. 181-238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
24. Gottman, J. M., Coan, J., Carrere, S., & Swanson, C. (1998). Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 5-22.
25. Gray, J. A. (1994a). Personality dimensions and emotion systems. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 329-331). New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Gray, J. A. (1994b). Three fundamental emotion systems. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 243-247). New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3-34.
28. Kellert, S. H. (1993). In the wake of chaos: Unpredictable order in dynamical systems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., etal. (1983). Close relationships. New York: Freeman.
30. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
31. Laurenceau, J.-P., & Bolger, N. (2005). Using diary methods to study marital and family processes. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 86-97.
32. Laurenceau, J.-P., Kleinman, B. M., Kaczynski, K. J., & Carver, C. S. (2010). Assessment of relationship-specific incentive and threat sensitivities: Predicting satisfaction and affect in adult intimate relationships. Psychological Assessment, 22, 407-419.
33. Lawrence, J. W., Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2002). Velocity toward goal attainment in immediate experience as a determinant of affect. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 788-802.
34. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.
35. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268.
36. Molenaar, P. C. M., & Ram, N. (2010). Dynamic modeling and optimal control of intraindividual variation: A computational paradigm for nonergodic psychological processes. In S. Chow, E. Ferrer, & F. Hsieh (Eds.), Statistical methods for modeling human dynamics. New York: Taylor & Francis.
37. Nesselroade, J. R. (1991). The warp and woof of the developmental fabric. In R. Downs, L. Liben, & D. S. Palermo (Eds.), Visions of aesthetics, the environment, and development: The legacy of Joachim F. Wohwill (pp. 213-240). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Powers, W. (1973). Behavior: The control of perception. New York: Aldine.
39. Ram, N., & Gerstorf, D. (2009). Time-structured and net intraindividual variability: Tools for examining the development of dynamic characteristics and processes. Psychology and Aging, 24, 778-791.
40. Ramsay, J. O., & Silverman, B. W. (2002). Applied functional data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
41. Raudenbush, S. W., Brennan, R. T., & Barnett, R. (1995). A multivariate hierarchical model for studying psychological change within married couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 161-174.
42. Reis, H. T., Capobianco, A., & Tsai, F. F. (2002). Finding the person in personal relationships. Journal of Personality, 70, 813-850.
43. Rivera, D. E., Pew, M. D., & Collins, L. M. (2007). Using engineering control principles to inform the design of adaptive interventions. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 88, S31-S40.
44. Shoda, Y., Cervone, D., & Downey, G. (2007). Persons in context: Building a science of the individual. New York: Guilford Press.
45. Shoda, Y., & Mischel, W. (1998). Personality as a stable cognitive-affective activation network: Characteristic patterns of behavior variation emerge from a stable personality structure. In S. J. Read & L. C. Miller (Eds.), Connectionist models of social reasoning and social behavior (pp. 175-208). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Sinclair, K. O., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2008). Optimal control of psychological processes: A new computational paradigm. Bulletin de la Societe des Sciences Medicales Luxembourg, 1, 13-33.
47. Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton.
48. Sliwinski, M. J. (2008). Measurement-burst designs for social health research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 245-261.
49. Watson, D., Wiese, D., Vaidya, J., & Tellegen, A. (1999). The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 820-838.
50. Weiss, R. L. (1980). Strategic behavioral marital therapy: Toward a model for assessment and intervention. In J. P. Vincent (Ed.), Advances in family intervention, assessment, and theory (Vol. 1, pp. 229-271). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
51. Zayas, V., Shoda, Y., & Ayduk, O. N. (2002). Personality in context: An interpersonal systems perspective. Journal of Personality, 70, 851-900.