Modeling Affective Processes in Dyadic Relations via Dynamic Factor Analysis

Emotion

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 344-360

  Ferrer, Emilio ^a,b   Nesselroade, John R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFFECT; ARTICLE; EMOTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; MARRIAGE; MODEL; SPOUSE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ADULT; AFFECT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SPOUSES;

EID: 0344550505     PISSN: 15283542     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.3.4.344     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Allison, P. D., & Liker, J. K. (1982). Analyzing sequential categorical data on dyadic interaction: A comment on Gottman. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 393-403.
2. Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
3. Anderson, T. W. (1963). The use of factor analysis in the statistical analysis of multiple time series. Psychometrika, 28, 1-25.
4. Bell, R. Q., & Harper, L. V. (1977). Child effects on adults. New York: Wiley.
5. Bobitt, R. A., Gourevitch, V. P., Miller, L. E., & Jensen, G. D. (1969). Dynamics of social interactive behavior: A computerized procedure for analyzing trends, patterns, and sequences. Psychological Bulletin, 71, 110-121.
6. Boker, S. M. (2001). Differential structural modeling of intraindividual variability. In L. Collins & A. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 5-27). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
7. Boker, S. M., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2002). A method for modeling the intrinsic dynamics of intraindividual variability: Recovering the parameters of simulated oscillators in multi-wave panel data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37, 127-160.
8. Brillinger, D. R. (1975). Time series: Data analysis and theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
9. Browne, M. W., & Nesselroade, J. R. (in press). Representing psychological processes with dynamic factor models: Some promising uses and extensions of ARMA time series models. In A. Maydeu-Olivares & J. J. McArdle (Eds.), Psychometrics: A festschrift to R. P. McDonald.
10. Campbell, L., & Kashy, D. A. (2002). Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HIM: A guided tour. Personal Relationships, 9, 327-342.
11. Campbell, L., Simpson, J. A., Kashy, D. A., & Fletcher, G. (2001). Ideal standards, the self, and flexibility of ideals in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 447-462.
12. Castellan, N. J. (1979). The analysis of behavior sequences. In R. B. Cairns (Ed.), The analysis of social interactions: Methods, issues, and illustrations (pp. 81-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Cattell, R. B. (1952). Factor analysis. New York: Harper.
14. Cattell, R. B. (1961). Theory of situational, instrument, second order, and refraction factors in personality structure research. Psychological Bulletin, 58, 160-174.
15. Cattell, R. B. (1963). The structuring of change by P-technique and incremental R-technique. In C. W. Harris (Ed.), Problems in measuring change (pp. 167-198). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
16. Cattell, R. B., Cattell, A. K. S., & Rhymer, R. M. (1947). P-technique demonstrated in determining psychophysical source traits in a normal individual. Psychometrika, 12, 267-288.
17. Cowan, C. P., & Cowan, P. A. (2000). When partners become parents: The big life change for couples. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. du Toit, H. C., & Browne, M. W. (2001). The covariance structure of a vector ARMA time series. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future (pp. 279-314). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
19. Ferrer, E., & McArdle, J. J. (2003). Alternative structural models for multivariate longitudinal data analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 493-524.
20. Goodman, L. A. (1970). The multivariate analysis of qualitative data: Interactions among multiple classifications. Journal of the American Statistical Associations, 65, 226-256.
21. Gottman, J. M. (1979). Detecting cyclicity in social interaction. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 338-348.
22. Gottman, J. M. (1980). Marital interaction: Experimental investigations. New York: Academic Press.
23. Gottman, J. M. (1993). The analysis of change. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Gottman, J. M. (1998). Psychology and the study of the marital processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 169-197.
25. Gottman, J. M., & Notarius, C. I. (2000). Decade review: Observing marital interaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 927-947.
26. Griffin, W. A., & Gottman, J. M. (1990). Statistical methods for analyzing family interaction. In G. Patterson (Ed.), Depression and aggression in family interaction: Advances in family research (pp. 131-168). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Hershberger, S. L., Corneal, S. E., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (1994). Dynamic factor analysis: An application to emotional response patterns underlying daughter/father and stepdaughter/stepfather relationships. Structural Equation Modeling, 2, 31-52.
28. Hershberger, S. L., Molenaar, P. C. M., & Corneal, S. E. (1996). A hierarchy of univariate and multivariate structural times series models. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 159-194). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Holtzman, W. C. (1963). Statistical models for the study of change in the single case. In C. W. Harris (Ed.), Problems in measuring change (pp. 19-211). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
30. Hooker, K., Nesselroade, D. W., Nesselroade, J. R., & Lerner, R. M. (1987). The structure of intraindividual temperament in the context of mother-child dyads: P-technique factor analyses of short-term change. Development Psychology, 23, 332-346.
31. Jones, C. J., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1990). Multivariate replicated, single-subject, repeated measures designs and P-technique factor analysis: A review of intraindividual change studies. Experimental Aging Research, 16, 171-183.
32. Kashy, D. A., & Kenny, D. A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In H. T. Reiss & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology (pp. 451-477). New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Kenny, D. A., Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., Livi, S., & Kashy, D. A. (2002). The statistical analysis of data from small groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 126-137.
34. Killgore, W. D. S. (1996). Evidence for a third factor on the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule in a college student sample. Psychology and Aging, 11, 396-407.
35. Kishton, J. M., & Widaman, K. F. (1994). Unidimensional versus domain representative parceling of questionnaire items: An empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 757-765.
36. Larsen, R. J., & Cutler, S. E. (1996). The complexity of individual emotional lives: A within-subject analysis of affect structure. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 206-230.
37. Laurent, J., Catanzaro, S. J., Joiner, T. E. J., Rudolph, K. D., Potter, K. L., Lambert, S., et al. (1999). A measure of positive and negative affect for children: Scale development and preliminary validation. Psychological Assessment, 11, 326-338.
38. Luborsky, L., & Mintz, J. (1972). The contribution of P-technique to personality, psychotherapy, and psychosomatic research. In R. M. Dreger (Ed.), Multivariate personality research: Contributions to the understanding of personality in honor of Raymond B. Cattell (pp. 387-410). Baton Rouge, LA: Claitor's Publishing Division.
39. McArdle, J. J. (1982). Structural equation modeling of an individual system: Preliminary results from "A case study of alcoholism." Unpublished manuscript, University of Denver.
40. McArdle, J. J. (2001). A latent difference score approach to longitudinal dynamic analysis. In R. Cudeck, S. Du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future (pp. 341-380). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
41. McArdle, J. J., & Hamagami, F. (2001). Linear dynamic analyses of incomplete longitudinal data. In L. Collins & A. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 139-175). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
42. Melvin, G. A., & Molloy, G. N. (2000). Some psychometric properties of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule among Australian youth. Psychological Reports, 86, 1209-1212.
43. Mitteness, L. S., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1987). Attachment in adulthood: Longitudinal investigation of mother-daughter affective interdependencies by P-technique factor analysis. The Southern Psychologist, 3, 37-44.
44. Molenaar, P. C. M. (1985). A dynamic factor model for the analysis of multivariate time series. Psychometrika, 50, 181-202.
45. Molenaar, P. C. M. (1994). Dynamic latent variable models in developmental psychology. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 155-180). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46. Molenaar, P. C. M., De Gooijer, J. G., & Schmitz, B. (1992). Dynamic factor analysis of nonstationary multivariate time series. Psychometrika, 57, 333-349.
47. Nesselroade, J. R., McArdle, J. J., Aggen, S. H., & Meyers, J. M. (2002). Alternative dynamic factor models for multivariate time-series analyses. In D. M. Moscowitz & S. L. Hershberger (Eds.), Modeling intraindividual variability with repeated measures data: Advances and techniques (pp. 235-265). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Nesselroade, J. R., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (1999). Pooling lagged covariance structures based on short, multivariate time series for dynamic factor analysis. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 224-251). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
49. Newsom, J. T. (2002). A multilevel structural equation model for dyadic data. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 431-447.
50. Newtson, D. (1993). The dynamics of action and interaction. In L. B. Smith & E. Thelen (Eds.), A dynamic systems approach to development: Applications (pp. 241-264). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51. Raudenbush, S. W., Brennan, R. T., & Barnett, R. C. (1995). A multivariate hierarchical model for studying psychological change within married couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 161-174.
52. Robins, R. W., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2000). Two personalities, one relationship: Both partners' personality traits shape the quality of their relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 251-259.
53. Ryan, K. D., Gottman, J. M., Murray, J. D., Carrere, S., & Swanson, C. (2000). Theoretical and mathematical modeling of marriage. In M. D. Lewis & I. Granic (Eds.), Emotion, development, and self-organization: Dynamic systems approaches to emotional development (pp. 349-372). New York: Cambridge University Press.
54. Sackett, G. P. (1979). The lag sequential analysis of contingency and cyclicity in behavioral interaction research. In J. Osofsky (Ed.), Handbook of infant development (pp. 623-649). New York: Wiley.
55. Shifren, K., Hooker, K., Wood, P., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1997). Structure and variation of mood in individuals with Parkinson's disease: A dynamic factor analysis. Psychology and Aging, 12, 328-339.
56. Tesser, A., & Achee, J. (1994). Aggression, love, conformity, and other social psychological catastrophes. In R. R. Vallacher & A. Nowak (Eds.), Dynamical systems in social psychology (pp. 95-109). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
57. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
58. Wessman, A. E., & Ricks, D. F. (1966). Mood and personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
59. Wood, P., & Brown, D. (1994). The study of intraindividual differences by means of dynamic factor models: Rationale, implementation, and interpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 166-186.
60. Zevon, M. A., & Tellegen, A. (1982). The structure of mood change: An idiographic/nomothetic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 111-122.