Feedback type as a moderator of the relationship between achievement goals and feedback reactions

Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology

Volumn 84, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 703-722

  Anseel, Frederik ^a   Van Yperen, Nico W ^b   Janssen, Onne ^b   Duyck, Wouter ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 81355147081     PISSN: 09631798     EISSN: 20448325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/096317910X516372     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271. doi:
2. Anderson, L. J., & Jones, R. G. (2000). Affective, behavioral, and cognitive acceptance of feedback: Individual difference moderators. In N. M. Ashkanasy & C. E. Haertel (Eds.), Emotions in the workplace: Research, theory, and practice (pp. 130-140). Westport, CT : Quorum.
3. Anseel, F., & Lievens, F. (2006). Certainty as a moderator of feedback reactions? A test of the strength of the self-verification motive. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79, 533-551. doi:
4. Anseel, F., Lievens, F., & Schollaert, E. (2009). Reflection as a strategy to enhance task performance after feedback. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110, 23-35. doi:
5. Atwater, L. E., & Brett, J. F. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of reactions to developmental 360 degrees feedback. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 532-548. doi:
6. Bell, S. T., & Arthur, W. (2008). Feedback acceptance in developmental assessment centers: The role of feedback message, participant personality, and affective response to the feedback session. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 681-703. doi:
7. Brett, J. F., & Atwater, L. E. (2001). 360° feedback: Accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 930-942. doi:
8. Chen, G., Gully, S. M., Whiteman, J. A., & Kilcullen, R. N. (2000). Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 835-847. doi:
9. Chen, G., & Mathieu, J. E. (2008). Goal orientation dispositions and performance trajectories: The roles of supplementary and complementary situational inducements. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106, 21-38. doi:
10. Colquitt, J. A., & Simmering, M. J. (1998). Conscientiousness, goal orientation, and motivation to learn during the learning process: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 654-665. doi:
11. Cron, W. L., Slocum, J. W., Jr., VandeWalle, D., & Fu, Q. (2005). The role of goal orientation on negative emotions and goal setting when initial performance falls short of one's performance goal. Human Performance, 18, 55-80. doi:
12. Darnon, C., Harackiewicz, J. M., Butera, F., Mugny, G., & Quiamzade, A. (2007). Performance-approach and performance-avoidance goals: When uncertainty makes a difference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 813-827. doi:
13. DeNisi, A. S., & Kluger, A. N. (2000). Feedback effectiveness: Can 360-degree appraisals be improved Academy of Management Executive, 14, 129-139.
14. DeShon, R. P., & Gillespie, J. Z. (2005). A motivated action theory account of goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1096-1127. doi:
15. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048. doi:
16. Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1-22. doi:
17. Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169-189. doi:
18. Elliot, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In A. J Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52-72). New York : Guilford Press.
19. Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232. doi:
20. Elliot, A. J., & Fryer, J. W. (2006). The goal construct in psychology. In J. Shah & W. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivational science (pp. 239-268). New York : Guilford Press.
21. Elliot, A. J., & Moller, A. C. (2003). Performance-approach goals: Good or bad forms of regulation International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 339-356. doi:
22. Elliot, A. J., Shell, M. M., Henry, K. B., & Maier, M. A. (2005). Achievement goals, performance contingencies, and performance attainment: An experimental test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 630-640. doi:
23. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 638-645. doi:
24. Ilgen, D. R., & Davis, C. A. (2000). Bearing bad news: Reactions to negative performance feedback. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 550-565. doi:
25. Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., & Taylor, M. S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 349-371. doi:
26. Janssen, O., & Prin, J. T. (2007). Goal orientations and the seeking of different types of feedback information. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 235-249. doi:
27. Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (1989). Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 657-690. doi:
28. Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. (2007). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 141-184. doi:
29. Keeping, L. M., & Levy, P. E. (2000). Performance appraisal reactions: Measurement, modeling, and method bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 708-723. doi:
30. Kinicki, A. J., Prussia, G. E., Wu, B., McKee-Ryan, F. M. (2004). A covariance structure analysis of employees' responses to performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1057-1069. doi:
31. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. S. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254-284. doi:
32. Korman, A. (1970). Toward an hypothesis of work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 31-41. doi:
33. Korsgaard, M. A. (1996). The impact of self-appraisals on reactions to feedback from others: The role of self-enhancement and self-consistency concerns. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 301-311. doi:
34. Kozlowski, S. W. J., Toney, R. J., Mullins, M. E., Weissbein, D. A., Brown, K. G., & Bell, B. S. (2001). Developing adaptability: A theory for the design of integrated-embedded training systems. In Salas, E. (Ed.), Advances in human performance and cognitive engineering research (pp. 59-123). Amsterdam : Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
35. Kuvaas, B. (2006). Performance appraisal satisfaction and employee outcomes: Mediating and moderating roles of motivation. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17, 504-522. doi:
36. Lievens, F., & Anseel, F. (2007). Creating alternate in-basket forms through cloning: Some preliminary results. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 428-433. doi:
37. Linnenbrink, E. A. (2005). The dilemma of performance-approach goals: The use of multiple goal contexts to promote students' motivation and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 197-213. doi:
38. Maehr, M. L., & Midgley, C. (1991). Enhancing student motivation: A schoolwide approach. Educational Psychologist, 26, 399-427. doi:
39. Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. A. (1997). Making students' evaluation of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias and utility. American Psychologist, 52, 1187-1197. doi:
40. Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 77-86. doi:
41. O'Reilly, C. A., & Anderson, J. C. (1980). Trust and the communication of performance appraisal information: The effect of feedback on performance and job satisfaction. Human Communication Research, 6, 290-298. doi:
42. Payne, S. C., Youngcourt, S. S., & Beaubien, J. M. (2007). A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 128-150. doi:
43. Senko, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2005). Achievement goals, task performance, and interest: Why perceived goal difficulty matters. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1739-1753. doi:
44. Stanton, J. M., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2001). Using Internet/Intranet web pages to collect organizational research data. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 200-217. doi:
45. Swann, W. B., & Schroeder, D. G. (1995). The search for beauty and truth: A framework for understanding reactions to evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1307-1318. doi:
46. Taylor, M. S., Fisher, C. D., & Ilgen, D. R. (1984). Individuals' reactions to performance feedback in organizations: A control theory perspective. In K. M. Rowland & G. R. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 2, pp. 81-124). Greenwich, CT : JAI Press.
47. Tonidandel, S., Quinones, M. A., & Adams, A. A. (2002). Computer-adaptive testing: The impact of test characteristics as perceived performance and test takers' reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 320-332.
48. VandeWalle, D. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 995-1015. doi:
49. Van Yperen, N. W. (2003). Task interest and actual performance: The moderating effects of assigned and adopted purpose goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1006-1015. doi:
50. Van Yperen, N. W. (2006). A novel approach to assessing achievement goals in the context of the 2×2 framework: Identifying distinct profiles of individuals with different dominant achievement goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1432-1445. doi:
51. Van Yperen, N. W., Elliot, A. J., & Anseel, F. (2009). The influence of mastery-avoidance goals on performance improvement. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 932-943. doi:
52. Woo, S., Sims, C., Rupp, D., & Gibbons, A. M. (2008). Development engagement within and following developmental assessment centers: Considering feedback favorability and self-assessor agreement. Personnel Psychology, 61, 727-759. doi: