Structural priming as implicit learning: Cumulative priming effects and individual differences

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1133-1139

  Kaschak, Michael P ^a   Kutta, Timothy J ^a   Jones, John L ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Implicit learning; Individual differences; Language production; Structural priming

Indexed keywords

EID: 81355139713     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0157-y     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bates, D. M., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2011). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes (R package Version 0. 999375-39). Available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4.
2. Bernolet, S., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2010). Does verb bias modulate syntactic priming? Cognition, 114, 455-461.
3. Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355-387.
4. Bock, J. K., & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 129, 177-192.
5. Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113, 234-272.
6. Conway, C. M., Bauernschmidt, A., Huang, S. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (2010). Implicit statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the key. Cognition, 114, 356-371.
7. Coyle, J. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2008). Patterns of experience with verbs affect long-term cumulative structural priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 967-970.
8. Farmer, T., Fine, A., & Jaeger, F. (2011). Implicit context-specific learning leads to rapid shifts in syntactic expectations. In L. Carlson, C. Hoelscher, & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), Expanding the space of cognitive science: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2055-2060). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
9. Ferreira, V. S. (2003). The persistence of optional complementizer mention: Why saying a "that" is not saying "that" at all. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 379-398.
10. Gebauer, G. F., & Mackintosh, N. J. (2007). Psychometric intelligence dissociates implicit and explicit learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 34-54.
11. Hartsuiker, R. J., Bernolet, S., Schoonbaert, S., Speybroeck, S., & Vanderelst, D. (2008). Syntactic priming persists while the lexical boost decays: Evidence from written and spoken dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 214-238.
12. Hartsuiker, R. J., & Westenberg, C. (2000). Word order priming in written and spoken sentence production. Cognition, 75, B27-B39.
13. Jaeger, T. F., & Snider, N. (2008). Implicit learning and syntactic persistence: Surprisal and cumulativity. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1061-1066). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
14. Kaschak, M. P. (2006). What this construction needs is generalized. Memory & Cognition, 34, 368-379.
15. Kaschak, M. P. (2007). Long-term structural priming affects subsequent patterns of language production. Memory & Cognition, 35, 925-937.
16. Kaschak, M. P., & Borreggine, K. L. (2008). Is long-term structural priming affected by patterns of experience with individual verbs? Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 862-878.
17. Kaschak, M. P., & Glenberg, A. M. (2004). This construction needs learned. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 133, 450-467.
18. Kaschak, M. P., Kutta, T. J., & Schatschneider, C. (2011). Long-term cumulative structural priming persists for (at least) one week. Memory & Cognition, 39, 381-388.
19. Kaschak, M. P., Loney, R. A., & Borreggine, K. L. (2006). Recent experience affects the strength of structural priming. Cognition, 99, B73-B82.
20. Kaufman, S. B., DeYoung, C. G., Gray, J. R., Jiminez, L., Brown, J., & Mackintosh, N. (2010). Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition, 116, 321-340.
21. Kraljic, T., Brennan, S. E., & Samuel, A. G. (2008). First impressions and last resorts: How listeners adjust to speaker variability. Psychological Science, 19, 332-338.
22. Misyak, J. B., & Christiansen, M. H. (in press). Statistical learning and language: An individual differences study. Language Learning.
23. Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 633-651.
24. R Development Core Team (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
25. Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Reitter, D., Keller, F., & Moore, J. D. (2011). A computational cognitive model of syntactic priming. Cognitive Science, 35, 587-637. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1551-6709. 2010. 01165. x.
27. Scheepers, C. (2003). Syntactic priming of relative clause attachments: Persistence of structural configuration in sentence production. Cognition, 89, 179-205.
28. Wells, J. B., Christiansen, M. H., Race, D. S., Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009). Experience and sentence comprehension: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 250-271.