What this construction needs is generalized

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 368-379

  Kaschak, Michael P ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KNOWLEDGE; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LEARNING; VERBALIZATION; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; LINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS;

ATTENTION; COMPREHENSION; CONCEPT FORMATION; CUES; GENERALIZATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 33745658123     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193414     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. BAGULEY, T. (2003). Simple main effects in ANOVA. Retrieved December 9, 2003 from www-staff.lboro.ac.uk/~hutsb/simple.htm.
2. BOCK, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355-387.
3. BOCK, [J.] K. (1989). Closed-class imminence in sentence production. Cognition, 31, 163-186.
4. BOCK, [J.] K., & GRIFFIN, Z. M. (2000). The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 177-192.
5. BRANIGAN, H. P., PICKERING, M. J., & CLELAND, A. A. (2000). Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75, B13-B25.
6. BRANIGAN, H. P., PICKERING, M. J., & MCLEAN, J. F. (2005). Priming prepositional-phrase attachment during comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 468-481.
7. BRANIGAN, H. P., PICKERING, M. J., MCLEAN, J. F., & STEWART, A. J. (in press). The scope of grammatical encoding during language production: Evidence from syntactic priming. Language & Cognitive Processes.
8. BROOKS, P. J., & TOMASELLO, M. (1999). Young children learn to produce passives with nonce verbs. Developmental Psychology, 35, 29-44.
9. CAREY, P. W., MEHLER, J., & BEVER, T. G. (1970). Judging the veracity of ambiguous sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 9, 243-254.
10. CHAFFIN, R., MORRIS, R. K., & SEELY, R. E. (2001). Learning new word meanings from context: A study of eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 225-235.
11. CHANG, F., DELL, G. S., BOCK, K., & GRIFFIN, Z. M. (2000). Structural priming as implicit learning: A comparison of models of sentence production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 217-229.
12. CLELAND, A. A., & PICKERING, M. J. (2003). The use of lexical and syntactic information in language production: Evidence from the priming of noun phrase structure. Journal of Memory & Language, 49, 214-230.
13. CLELAND, A. A., & PICKERING, M. J. (2006). Do writing and speaking employ the same syntactic representations? Journal of Memory & Language, 54, 185-198.
14. DELL, G. S., REED, K. D., ADAMS, D. R., & MEYER, A. S. (2000). Speech errors, phonotactic constraints, and implicit learning: A study of the role of experience in language production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1355-1367.
15. FERREIRA, V. (2003). The persistence of optional complementizer production: Why saying "that" is not saying "that" at all. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 379-398.
16. FISHER, C. (1996). Structural limits on verb mapping: The role of analogy in children's interpretations of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 41-81.
17. FRAZIER, L., & CLIFTON, C. (1996). Construal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. GARNSEY, S. M., PEARLMUTTER, N. J., MYERS, E., & LOTOCKY, M. A. (1997). The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory & Language, 37, 58-93.
19. GARROD, S., & ANDERSON, A. (1987). Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination. Cognition, 27, 181-218.
20. GARROD, S., & DOHERTY, G. (1994). Conversation, co-ordination and convention: An empirical investigation of how groups establish linguistic conventions. Cognition, 53, 181-215.
21. GRIFFIN, Z. M., & WEINSTEIN-TULL, J. (2003). Conceptual structure modulates structural priming in the production of complex sentences. Journal of Memory & Language, 49, 537-555.
22. KASCHAK, M. P., & GLENBERG, A. M. (2000). Constructing meaning: The role of affordances and grammatical constructions in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory & Language, 43, 508-529.
23. KASCHAK, M. P., & GLENBERG, A. M. (2004). This construction needs learned. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 450-467.
24. KASCHAK, M. P., LONEY, R. A., & BORREGGINE, K. L. (2006). Recent experience affects the strength of structural priming. Cognition, 99, B73-B82.
25. KEPPEL, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26. LABOV, W. (1994). Principles of linguistic change: Vol. 1. Internal factors. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
27. LEVIN, B. (1993). English verbs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28. MACDONALD, M. C., PEARLMUTTER, N. J., & SEIDENBERG, M. S. (1994). Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676-703.
29. MCRAE, K., SPIVEY-KNOWLTON, M. J., & TANENHAUS, M. K. (1998). Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and other constraints) in online sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory & Language, 38, 283-312.
30. MURRAY, T. E., FRAZIER, T. C., & SIMON, B. L. (1996). Need + past participle in American English. American Speech, 71, 255-271.
31. MURRAY, T. E., & SIMON, B. L. (2001). At the intersection of regional and social dialects: The case of like + past participle in American English. American Speech, 77, 32-69.
32. NYGAARD, L. C., & PISONI, D. B. (1998). Talker-specific learning in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 355-376.
33. PICKERING, M. J., & BRANIGAN, H. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory & Language, 39, 633-651.
34. PICKERING, M. J., BRANIGAN, H. P., CLELAND, A. A., & STEWART, A. J. (2000). Activation of syntactic information during language production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 205-216.
35. SAVAGE, C., LIEVEN, E., THEAKSTON, A., & TOMASELLO, M. (2003). Testing the abstractness of children's linguistic representations: Lexical and structural priming of syntactic constructions in young children. Developmental Science, 6, 557-567.
36. SEIDENBERG, M. S., & MACDONALD, M. C. (1999). A probabilistic constraints approach to language acquisition and processing. Cognitive Science, 23, 569-588.
37. TRUESWELL, J. C., TANENHAUS, M. K., & KELLO, C. (1993). Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 528-553.