Modeling cellular processes in 3D

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 21, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 692-700

  Mogilner, Alex ^a   Odde, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b University of Minnesota   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL DIVISION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL MIGRATION; CELL MOTILITY; CELL POLARITY; CELL STRUCTURE; CENTROSOME; CYTOLOGY; DIFFUSION; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; GEOMETRY; MITOSIS SPINDLE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SYNCYTIUM; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ACTINS; ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CELL DIVISION; CELL MOVEMENT; CELL POLARITY; CELL SURFACE EXTENSIONS; CELLS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 81355127248     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: 18793088     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2011.09.007     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. McQueen D.M., Peskin C.S. A three-dimensional computer model of the human heart for studying cardiac fluid dynamics. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 2000, 34:56-60.
2. Berg O.G., et al. Diffusion-driven mechanisms of protein translocation on nucleic acids. 1. Models and theory. Biochemistry 1981, 20:6929-6948.
3. Sheinman M., Kafri Y. The effects of intersegmental transfers on target location by proteins. Phys. Biol. 2009, 6:016003.
4. Winter R.B., et al. Diffusion-driven mechanisms of protein translocation on nucleic acids. 3. The Escherichia coli lac repressor-operator interaction: kinetic measurements and conclusions. Biochemistry 1981, 20:6961-6977.
5. Gibson W.T., et al. Control of the mitotic cleavage plane by local epithelial topology. Cell 2011, 144:427-438.
6. Thery M., Bornens M. Cell shape and cell division. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2006, 18:648-657.
7. Reinsch S., Gonczy P. Mechanisms of nuclear positioning. J. Cell Sci. 1998, 111:2283-2295.
8. Vogel S.K., et al. Self-organization of dynein motors generates meiotic nuclear oscillations. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7:e1000087.
9. Grill S.W., et al. Theory of mitotic spindle oscillations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 94:108104.
10. Kozlowski C., et al. Cortical microtubule contacts position the spindle in C. elegans embryos. Cell 2007, 129:499-510.
11. Minc N., et al. Influence of cell geometry on division-plane positioning. Cell 2011, 144:414-426.
12. Odell G.M., Foe V.E. An agent-based model contrasts opposite effects of dynamic and stable microtubules on cleavage furrow positioning. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 183:471-483.
13. Kirschner M., Mitchison T. Beyond self-assembly: from microtubules to morphogenesis. Cell 1986, 45:329-342.
14. Magidson V., et al. The spatial arrangement of chromosomes during prometaphase facilitates spindle assembly. Cell 2011, 146:555-567.
15. Li R., Gundersen G.G. Beyond polymer polarity: how the cytoskeleton builds a polarized cell. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9:860-873.
16. Turing A.M. The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 1952, 237:37-72.
17. Wolpert L. Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. J. Theor. Biol. 1969, 25:1-47.
18. Crick F. Diffusion in embryogenesis. Nature 1970, 225:420-422.
19. Driever W., Nusslein-Volhard C. A gradient of bicoid protein in Drosophila embryos. Cell 1988, 54:83-93.
20. Grimm O., et al. Modelling the bicoid gradient. Development 2010, 137:2253-2264.
21. Houchmandzadeh B., et al. Establishment of developmental precision and proportions in the early Drosophila embryo. Nature 2002, 415:798-802.
22. Castle B.T., et al. Assessment of transport mechanisms underlying the bicoid morphogen gradient. Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 2011, 4:116-121.
23. Gregor T., et al. Stability and nuclear dynamics of the bicoid morphogen gradient. Cell 2007, 130:141-152.
24. Hecht I., et al. Determining the scale of the Bicoid morphogen gradient. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:1710-1715.
25. Sprague B.L., McNally J.G. FRAP analysis of binding: proper and fitting. Trends Cell Biol. 2005, 15:84-91.
26. Sprague B.L., et al. Analysis of binding reactions by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Biophys. J. 2004, 86:3473-3495.
27. Little S.C., et al. The formation of the Bicoid morphogen gradient requires protein movement from anteriorly localized mRNA. PLoS Biol. 2011, 9:e1000596.
28. Spirov A., et al. Formation of the bicoid morphogen gradient: an mRNA gradient dictates the protein gradient. Development 2009, 136:605-614.
29. Fowlkes C.C., et al. A quantitative spatiotemporal atlas of gene expression in the Drosophila blastoderm. Cell 2008, 133:364-374.
30. Coppey M., et al. Modeling the bicoid gradient: diffusion and reversible nuclear trapping of a stable protein. Dev. Biol. 2007, 312:623-630.
31. Mavrakis M., et al. Plasma membrane polarity and compartmentalization are established before cellularization in the fly embryo. Dev. Cell 2009, 16:93-104.
32. Sample C., Shvartsman S.Y. Multiscale modeling of diffusion in the early Drosophila embryo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:10092-10096.
33. Griffin E.E., et al. Regulation of the MEX-5 gradient by a spatially segregated kinase/phosphatase cycle. Cell 2011, 146:955-968.
34. Maxwell J.C. Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism 1873, Clarendon Press.
35. Brosseau C. Modeling and simulation of dielectric heterostructures: a physical survey from an historical perspective. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2006, 39:1277-1294.
36. Toledo P.G., et al. Transport properties of anisotropic porous media: effective medium theory. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1991, 47:391-405.
37. Weiner O.D. Regulation of cell polarity during eukaryotic chemotaxis: the chemotactic compass. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2002, 14:196-202.
38. Pollard T.D., Borisy G.G. Cellular motility driven by assembly and disassembly of actin filaments. Cell 2003, 112:453-465.
39. Gerbal F., et al. An elastic analysis of Listeria monocytogenes propulsion. Biophys. J. 2000, 79:2259-2275.
40. Cameron L.A., et al. Motility of ActA protein-coated microspheres driven by actin polymerization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96:4908-4913.
41. Sekimoto K., et al. Role of tensile stress in actin gels and symmetry-breaking instability. Eur. Phys. J. E: Soft Matter 2004, 13:247-259.
42. Dayel M.J., et al. In silico reconstitution of actin-based symmetry breaking and motility. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7:e1000201.
43. DiMilla P.A., et al. Mathematical model for the effects of adhesion and mechanics on cell migration speed. Biophys. J. 1991, 60:15-37.
44. Palecek S.P., et al. Integrin-ligand binding properties govern cell migration speed through cel-substratum adhesiveness. Nature 1997, 385:537-540.
45. Keren K., et al. Mechanism of shape determination in motile cells. Nature 2008, 453:475-480.
46. Barnhart E.L., et al. An adhesion-dependent switch between mechanisms that determine motile cell shape. PLoS Biol. 2011, 9:e1001059.
47. Kruse K., et al. Contractility and retrograde flow in lamellipodium motion. Phys. Biol. 2006, 3:130-137.
48. Herant M., Dembo M. Form and function in cell motility: from fibroblasts to keratocytes. Biophys. J. 2010, 98:1408-1417.
49. Even-Ram S., Yamada K.M. Cell migration in 3D matrix. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2005, 17:524-532.
50. Soon L., et al. Moving in the right direction - nanoimaging in cancer cell motility and metastasis. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2007, 70:252-257.
51. Chaturvedi R., et al. On multiscale approaches to three-dimensional modelling of morphogenesis. J. R. Soc. Interface 2005, 2:237-253.
52. Boehm B., et al. The role of spatially controlled cell proliferation in limb bud morphogenesis. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8:e1000420.
53. Sherrard K., et al. Sequential activation of apical and basolateral contractility drives ascidian endoderm invagination. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:1499-1510.
54. Tamulonis C., et al. A cell-based model of Nematostella vectensis gastrulation including bottle cell formation, invagination and zippering. Dev. Biol. 2011, 351:217-228.
55. Christley S., et al. Integrative multicellular biological modeling: a case study of 3D epidermal development using GPU algorithms. BMC Syst. Biol. 2010, 4:107.
56. Slepchenko B.M., Loew L.M. Use of virtual cell in studies of cellular dynamics. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 2010, 283:1-56.
57. Swat M.H., et al. Multicell simulations of development and disease using the CompuCell3D simulation environment. Methods Mol. Biol. 2009, 500:361-428.
58. Novak I.L., et al. Quantitative analysis of G-actin transport in motile cells. Biophys. J. 2008, 95:1627-1638.
59. Edelstein-Keshet L. Mathematical Models in Biology 2008, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
60. Logan J.D. Applied Mathematics 2006, Wiley.
61. Alberts J.B., Odell G.M. In silico reconstitution of Listeria propulsion exhibits nano-saltation. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2:e412.