The use of cohesive devices in argumentative writing by Chinese EFL learners at different proficiency levels

Linguistics and Education

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 31-48

  Yang, Wenxing ^a,b   Sun, Ying ^b  

^a BEIJING FOREIGN STUDIES UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b YANGZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Cohesive devices; EFL learners; ESL EFL writing pedagogy; Patterns of variation; Writing quality; Written discourse competence

Indexed keywords

EID: 81255163731     PISSN: 08985898     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.linged.2011.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Bachman L.F. Fundamental considerations in language teaching 1990, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
2. Bachman L.F., Palmer A.S. The construct validation of some components of communicative proficiency. TESOL Quarterly 1982, 16:449-465.
3. Bachman L.F., Palmer A.S. Language testing in practice 1996, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
4. Ben-Anath D. The role of connectives in text comprehension. Teachers College, Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics 2005, 5(2):1-27.
5. Biber D. Variation across speech and writing 1988, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
6. Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (1994). A comparative genre analysis: The research article and its popularization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
7. Biesenbach-Lucas S., Weasenforth D. E-mail and word processing in the ESL classroom: How the medium affects the message. Language Learning & Technology 2001, 5(1):135-165.
8. Blagoeva R. Demonstrative reference as a cohesive device in advanced learner writing: A corpus-based study. Advances in corpus linguistics: Papers from the 23rd International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 23) 2004, 297-307. Rodopi, Amsterdam. K. Aijmer, B. Altenberg (Eds.).
9. Canale M. On some dimensions of language proficiency. Issues in language testing research 1983, 333-342. Newbury House, Rowley, MA. J.W. Oller (Ed.).
10. Canale M., Swain M. Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics 1980, 1:1-47.
11. Celce-Murcia M. Grammar pedagogy in second and foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly 1991, 25:459-480.
12. Chafe W. Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy 1982, 35-54. Ablex, Norwood, NJ. D. Tannen (Ed.).
13. Chiang S.Y. Assessing grammatical and textual features in L2 writing samples: The case of French as a foreign language. The Modern Language Journal 1999, 83:219-232.
14. Chiang S.Y. The importance of cohesive conditions to perceptions of writing quality at the early stages of foreign language learning. System 2003, 31:471-484.
15. Connor U. A study of cohesion and coherence in ESL students' writing. Papers in Linguistics: International Journal of Human Communication 1984, 17:301-316.
16. Cox B.E., Shanahan T., Tinzmann M. Children's knowledge of organization, cohesion and voice. Research in the Teaching of English 1991, 25:179-218.
17. Crossley S.A., McNamara D.S. Computational assessment of lexical differences in L1 and L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 2009, 18:119-135.
18. Crowhurst M. Cohesion in argument and narration at three grade levels. Research in the Teaching of English 1987, 21:185-201.
19. Doughty C.J., Long M.H. The scope of inquiry and goals of SLA. The handbook of second language acquisition 2003, 3-16. Blackwell, Malden, MA. C.J. Doughty, M.H. Long (Eds.).
20. Ellis R. The study of second language acquisition 1994, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
21. Ellis R. Second language acquisition 1997, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
22. ETS The official guide to the TOEFL test 2009, Beijing Language and Culture University Press, Beijing.
23. English Team of Teaching and Learning Guidance Committee for Foreign Language Majors in Higher Institutions The teaching syllabus for English major in higher institutions 2000, Higher Education Press, Beijing.
24. Ferretti R.P., Andrews-Weckerly S., Lewis W.E. Improving the argumentative writing of students with learning disabilities: Descriptive and normative considerations. Reading & Writing Quarterly 2007, 23:267-285.
25. Gleason M.M. The role of evidence in argumentative writing. Reading & Writing Quarterly 1999, 14:81-106.
26. Golder C., Coirier P. Argumentative text writing: Developmental trends. Discourse Processes 1994, 18:187-210.
27. Golder C., Coirier P. The production and recognition of typological argumentative text markers. Argumentation 1996, 10:271-282.
28. Granger S., Tyson S. Connector usage in the English essay writing of native and non-native EFL speakers of English. World Englishes 1996, 15:17-27.
29. Green C.F., Christopher E.R., Jacquelyn L. The incidence and effects on coherence of marked themes in interlanguage texts: A corpus-based enquiry. English for Specific Purposes 2000, 19:99-113.
30. Halliday M.A.K. Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning 1978, Edward Arnold, London.
31. Halliday M.A.K. An introduction to functional grammar 1994, Edward Arnold, London.
32. Halliday M.A.K., Hasan R. Cohesion in English 1976, Longman, London.
33. Halliday M.A.K., Hasan R. Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a socio-semiotic perspective 1985, Deakin University Press, Victoria.
34. Harley B., Cummins J., Swain M., Allen P. The nature of language proficiency. The development of second language proficiency 1990, 7-25. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. B. Harley, J. Cummins, M. Swain, P. Allen (Eds.).
35. Hu Z. Yupian de xianjie yu lianguan 1994, Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, Shanghai.
36. Hu Z., Brown D.F., Brown L.B. Some linguistic differences in the written English of Chinese and Australian students. Language Learning and Communication 1982, 1:39-49.
37. Jin, W. (2001). A quantitative study of cohesion in Chinese graduate students' writing: Variations across genres and proficiency levels. Paper presented at the symposium on Second Language Writing at Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, September 15-16, 2000 [ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED452726].
38. Johnson D.P. Cohesion and coherence in compositions in Malay and English. RELC Journal 1992, 23:1-17.
39. Kang J.Y. Written narratives as an index of L2 competence in Korean EFL learners. Journal of Second Language Writing 2005, 14:259-279.
40. Kang S. The effects of a context-embedded approach to second-language vocabulary learning. System 1995, 23:43-56.
41. Kuhn D. The skill of argument 1991, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
42. Liu M., Braine G. Cohesive features in argumentative writing produced by Chinese undergraduates. System 2005, 33:623-636.
43. Louwerse M.M., McCarthy P.M., McNamara D.S., Graesser A.C. Variation in language and cohesion across written and spoken registers. Proceedings of the 26th annual cognitive science society 2004, 843-848. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. K. Forbus, D. Gentner, T. Regier (Eds.).
44. Maimon E., Peritz J., Yancey K. A writer's resource: A handbook for writing and research 2007, McGraw Hill, New York. 2nd ed.
45. McCarthy M. Discourse analysis for language teachers 1991, Cambridge University Press, New York.
46. McCutchen D., Perfetti C.A. Helping young writers manage a complex task. The Elementary School Journal 1983, 84:71-75.
47. McNamara D.S., Crossley S.A., McCarthy M. Linguistic features of writing quality. Written Communication 2010, 27:57-86.
48. Moskovit L. When is broad reference clear?. College Composition and Communication 1983, 34:454-469.
49. Neff, J., Martinez, F., & Rica, J. P. (2001). A contrastive study of qualification devices in native and non-native argumentative texts in English. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Applied Linguistics, St. Louis, MO, February 24-27, 2001 [ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED465301].
50. Neff-van Aertselaer J., Dafouz-Milne E. Argumentative patterns in different languages: An analysis of metadiscourse markers in English and Spanish texts. Developing contrastive pragmatics interlanguage and cross-cultural perspectives 2008, 87-102. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin/New York. M. Pütz, J. Neff-van Aertselaer (Eds.).
51. Nussbaum E.M., Kardash C.M. The effects of goal instructions and text on the generation of counterarguments during writing. Journal of Educational Psychology 2005, 97:157-169.
52. Reznitskaya A., Kuo L.J., Glina M., Anderson R.C. Measuring argumentative reasoning: What's behind the numbers?. Learning and Individual Differences 2009, 19:219-224.
53. Richards J.C., Schmidt R. Longman dictionary of language teaching & applied linguistics 1992, Longman, London.
54. Roberts P. Pronominal 'this': A quantitative analysis. American Speech 1952, 27:171-178.
55. Salkie R. Text and discourse analysis 1995, Routledge, London.
56. Shaw P., Liu E. What develops in the development of second-language writing?. Applied Linguistics 1998, 19:225-254.
57. Song M., Xia W. Yingyu xiezuo zhong yupian xianjie shouduan yu yupian jiaoxue-Dui fei yingyu zhuanye dayi benkesheng haozuowen yu cizuowen de tongji fenxi. Foreign Language World 2002, 6:40-44.
58. Spiegel D.L., Fitzgerald J. Textual cohesion and coherence in children's writing revisited. Research in the Teaching of English 1990, 24:49-66.
59. Thomas M. Assessment of L2 proficiency in second language acquisition research. Language Learning 1994, 44:307-336.
60. Thompson G. Introducing functional grammar 1996, Edward Arnold, London.
61. Todd R.W., Khongput S., Darasawang P. Coherence, cohesion and comments on students' academic essays. Assessing Writing 2007, 12:10-25.
62. van Hell J.G., Verhoeven L., Tak M., van Oosterhout M. To take a stance: A developmental study of the use of pronouns and passives in spoken and written narrative and expository texts in Dutch. Journal of Pragmatics 2005, 37:239-273.
63. Wang W., Wen Q. L1 use in the L2 composing process: An exploratory study of 16 Chinese EFL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 2002, 11:225-246.
64. Walton D. Argument structure: A pragmatic theory 1996, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
65. Wen Q. Xuexizhe yingyu yuti tezheng bianhua de yanjiu. Journal of Foreign Languages 2009, 32(4):2-10.
66. Wen Q., Ding Y., Wang W. Zhongguo daxuesheng yingyu shumianyu zhong de kouyuhua qingxiang: Gaoshuiping yingyu xuexizhe yuliao duibi fenxi. Foreign Language Teaching and Research 2003, 4:268-274.
67. Xu Y. Yingyu zuowen xianjie moshi yu xianjie cuowu de duibi fenxi. Foreign Language Teaching Abroad 2003, 3:54-60.
68. Zhang M. Cohesive features in the expository writing of undergraduates in two Chinese universities. RELC Journal 2000, 31:61-95.