Linguistic features of writing quality

Written Communication

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 57-86

  McNamara, Danielle S ^a   Crossley, Scott A ^b   McCarthy, Philip M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

^b MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Coherence; Cohesion; Computational linguistics; Essay quality; Writing proficiency

Indexed keywords

EID: 73249128238     PISSN: 07410883     EISSN: 15528472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741088309351547     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Baayen, R.H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
2. Bamberg, M. (1983). Hans Horman to mean, to understand: Problems of psychological semantics. Studies in Language, 7, 431-438.
3. Biber, D. (2003). Variation among university spoken and written registers: A new multidimensional analysis. In C. Meyer & P. Leistyna (Eds.), Corpus analysis: Language structure and language use (pp. 47-70). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Rodopi.
4. Bormuth, J.R. (1969). Development of readability analyses. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Education.
5. Brace, N., Kemp, R., & Snelgar, R. (2006). SPSS for psychologists: A guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows. London: Palgrave.
6. Chall, J., & Dale, E. (1995). Readability revisited: The new Dale-Chall readability formula. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
7. Charniak, E. (2000). A maximum-entropy-inspired parser. Proceedings of the First Conference on North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 132-139). San Francisco: Morgan Kauffmann.
8. Collins, J.L. (1998). Strategies for struggling writers. New York: Guilford.
9. Coltheart, M. (1981). MRC psycholinguistic database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33, 497-505.
10. Connor, U. (1984). A study of cohesion and coherence in ESL students' writing. Papers in Linguistic: International Journal of Human Communication, 17, 301-316.
11. Crossley, S.A., Louwerse, M., McCarthy, P.M., & McNamara, D.S. (2007). A linguistic analysis of simplified and authentic texts. Modern Language Journal, 91, 15-30.
12. Crowhurst, M. (1990). Reading/writing relationships: An intervention study. Canadian Journal of Education, 15, 155-172.
13. Davison, A., & Kantor, R. (1982). On the failure of readability formulas to define readable texts: A case study from adaptations. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 187-209.
14. DeVillez, R. (2003). Writing: Step by step. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
15. Ericsson, K.A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 683-703). New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Field, J. (2004). Psycholinguistics: The key concepts. New York: Routledge.
17. Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.
18. Geiser, S., & Studley, R. (2001). UC and SAT: Predictive validity and differential impact of the SAT I and SAT II at the University of California. Oakland: University of California.
19. Gernsbacher, M.A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hills-dale, NJ: Earlbaum.
20. Givón, T. (1995). Functionalism and grammar. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
21. Graesser, A.C., Jeon, M., Yang, Y., & Cai, Z. (2007). Discourse cohesion in text and tutorial dialogue. Information Design Journal, 15, 199-213.
22. Graesser, A.C., McNamara, D.S., & Louwerse, M.M. (2003). What do readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative and expository text. In A. P. Sweet & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 82-98). New York: Guilford.
23. Graesser, A.C., McNamara, D.S., Louwerse, M.M., & Cai, Z. (2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 193-202.
24. Haberlandt, K., & Graesser, A.C. (1985). Component processes in text comprehension and some of their interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 503-515.
25. Hall, C., Lewis, G.A., McCarthy, P.M., Lee, D.S., & McNamara, D.S. (2007). A Coh-Metrix assessment of American and English/Welsh Legal English. Coyote Papers: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives. University of Arizona Working Papers in Linguistics, 15, 40-54.
26. Halliday, M.A.K., & Hassan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
27. Just, M.A., & Carpenter, P.A. (1987). The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
28. Just, M.A., & Carpenter, P.A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.
29. Kellogg, R.T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research, 1, 1-26.
30. Landauer, T. K., McNamara, D. S., Dennis, S., & Kintsch, W. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of Latent Semantic Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Leki, I. (1993). Reciprocal themes in ESL reading and writing. In J. Carson & I. Leki (Eds.), Reading in the Composition Classroom: Second Language Perspectives (pp. 9-32). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
32. Light, R. (2001). Making the most of college. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Lightman, E.J., McCarthy, P.M., Dufty, D.F., & McNamara, D.S. (2007). The structural organization of high school educational texts. In D. Wilson & G. Sutcliffe (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society (FLAIRS) Conference (pp. 235-240). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
34. Liu, M., & Braine, G. (2005). Cohesive features in argumentative writing produced by Chinese undergraduates. System, 33, 623-636.
35. Louwerse, M.M. (2001). An analytic and cognitive parameterization of coherence relations. Cognitive Linguistics, 12, 291-315.
36. Louwerse, M.M., McCarthy, P.M., McNamara, D.S., & Graesser, A.C. (2004). Variation in language and cohesion across written and spoken registers. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Cognitive Science Society (pp. 843-848). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Magliano, J.P., Todaro, S., Millis, K., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Kim, H.J., & McNamara, D.S. (2005). Changes in reading strategies as a function of reading training: A comparison of live and computerized training. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32, 185-208.
38. McCarthy, P.M. (2005). An assessment of the range and usefulness of lexical diversity measures and the potential of the measure of textual, lexical diversity (MTLD). Dissertation Abstracts International, 66, 12. (UMI No. 3199485).
39. McCarthy, P.M., Briner, S.W., Rus, V., & McNamara, D.S. (2007). Textual signatures: Identifying text-types using latent semantic analysis to measure the cohesion of text structures. In A. Kao & S. Poteet (Eds.), Natural language processing and text mining (pp. 107-122). London: Springer-Verlag.
40. McCarthy, P.M., & Jarvis, S. (2007). A theoretical and empirical evaluation of vocd. Language Testing, 24, 459-488.
41. McCarthy, P.M., Lewis, G.A., Dufty, D.F., & McNamara, D.S. (2006). Analyzing writing styles with Coh-Metrix. In G. C. J. Sutcliffe & R. G. Goebel (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society International Conference (FLAIRS; pp. 764-770). Melbourne Beach, FL: AAAI Press.
42. McCutchen, D. (2000). Knowledge, processing, and working memory: Implication for a theory of writing. Educational Psychologist, 35, 13-23.
43. McNamara, D.S. (2001). Reading both high and low coherence texts: Effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 51-62.
44. McNamara, D. S. (Ed.). (2007). Reading comprehension strategies: Theory, interventions, and technologies. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. McNamara, D.S., Louwerse, M.M., McCarthy, P.M., & Graesser, A.C. (in press). Coh-Metrix: Capturing linguistic features of cohesion. Discourse Processes.
46. McNamara, D.S., & Scott, J.L. (2001). Working memory capacity and strategy use. Memory & Cognition, 29, 10-17.
47. Miller, G.A., Beckwith, R., Fellbaum, C., Gross, D., and Miller, K.J. (1990). Introduction to WordNet: An on-line lexical database. International Journal of Lexicography, 3, 235-244.
48. National Center for Educational Statistics. (2003). 2002 NAEP Writing 2002 State Snapshot Records (NCES 2003-532). Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved on October 18, 2009, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2003532.
49. O'Reilly, T., & McNamara, D.S. (2006). Reversing the reverse cohesion effect: Good texts can be better for strategic, high-knowledge readers. Discourse Processes, 43, 121-152.
50. O'Reilly, T., & McNamara, D.S. (2007). The impact of science knowledge, reading skill, and reading strategy knowledge on more traditional high-stakes measures of high school students' science achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 161-196.
51. Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension: Fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
52. Perfetti, C.A., Wlotko, E.W., & Hart, L.A. (2005). Word learning and individual differences in word learning reflected in event-related potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 31, 1281-1292.
53. Raimes, A. (2001). What unskilled ESL students do as they write: A classroom study of composing. In T. Silva & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Landmark essays: On ESL writing (pp. 37-62). Mahwah, NJ: Hermagoras Press.
54. Ransdell, S., & Wengelin, A. (2003). Socioeconomic and sociolinguistic predictors of children's L2 and L1 writing quality. Arob@se, 1-2, 22-29.
55. Raynor, A., & Pollatsek, K. (1994). The psychology of reading. Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
56. Swanson, H.L., & Berninger, V.W. (1996). Individual differences in children's working memory and writing skill. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 358-385.
57. Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper.
58. Todd, R.W., Khongputb, S., & Darasawanga, P. (2007). Coherence, cohesion and comments on students' academic essays. Assessing Writing, 12, 10-25.
59. Witte, S.P., & Faigley, L. (1981). Coherence, cohesion and writing quality. College Composition and Communication, 22, 189-204.