Effects of the interactive strategies approach-extended

Elementary School Journal

Volumn 112, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 281-306

  Gelzheiser, Lynn M ^a   Scanlon, Donna ^a   Vellutino, Frank ^a   Hallgren Flynn, Laura ^a   Schatschneider, Christopher ^b  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 81155139274     PISSN: 00135984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/661525     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Adams, M. J. (2009). The challenge of advanced texts: The independence of reading and learning. In E. H. Hiebert (Ed.), Reading more, reading better (pp. 163-189). New York: Guilford.
2. Allington, R. L. (2009). If they don't read much. 30 years later. In E. H. Hiebert (Ed.), Reading more, reading better (pp. 30-54). New York: Guilford.
3. Almasi, J. F. (1991). Helping students deal effectively with comprehension failure. Literacy: Issues and Practice, 8, 59-66.
4. Almasi, J. F., & Garas-York, K. (2009). Comprehension and discussion of text. In S. E. Israel & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 470-493). New York: Rout-ledge.
5. Anderson, K. L. (2009). The effects of professional development on early reading skills: A comparison of two approaches. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest (ATT 3365837).
6. Bear, D. R., Invernizzi, M., Templeton, S., & Johnson, F. (2004). Words their way (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
7. Bentum, K. E., & Aaron, P. G. (2003). Does reading instruction in reading disability resource rooms really work? A longitudinal study. Reading Psychology, 24, 361-382.
8. Biancarosa, G., & Snow, C. E. (2004). Reading next: A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy. A report from the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
9. Bonate, P. L. (2000). The analysis of pretest-posttest designs. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
10. Cazden, C. B. (1986). Classroom discourse. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 432- 463). New York: Macmillan.
11. Cervetti, G. N., Jaynes, C. A., & Hiebert, E. H. (2009). Increasing opportunities to acquire knowledge through reading. In E. H. Hiebert (Ed.), Reading more, reading better (pp. 79-100). New York: Guilford.
12. Chall, J. S., & Jacobs, V. A. (2003, Spring). Poor children's fourth-grade slump. American Educator, 14 -15.
13. Clay, M. M. (1991). Becoming literate: The construction of inner control. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
14. Clymer, T. (1963). The utility of phonic generalizations in the primary grades. Reading Teacher, 16, 252-258.
15. Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1998). What reading does for the mind. American Educator, 22, 8-15.
16. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-4. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
17. Ehri, L. C, Dreyer, L. G., Flugman, B., & Gross, A. (2007). Reading rescue: An effective tutoring intervention model for language minority students who are struggling readers in first grade. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 414-448.
18. Englebretson, R., Hiebert, E., & Juel, C. (2000). Ready Readers program. Parsippany, NJ: Modern Curriculum Press, Pearson Learning.
19. Espin, C. A., Shin, J., & Busch, T. W. (2005). Curriculum-based measurement in the content areas. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 353-363.
20. Gelzheiser, L. M. (2005). Maximizing student progress in one-to-one programs: Contributions of texts, volunteer experience, and student characteristics. Exceptionality, 13, 229-242.
21. Gelzheiser, L. M., & D'Angelo, C. (2000). Historical fiction and informational texts that support social studies standards. Language and Literacy Spectrum, 10, 26-39.
22. Gelzheiser, L. M., Scanlon, D. M., & DAngelo, C. (2001, April). The effects of community volunteers and poor readers engaging in interactive reading of thematically related texts. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle.
23. Gelzheiser, L. M., Scanlon, D. M., & Hallgren-Flynn, L. (2007). Social studies vocabulary measure. Albany, NY: Child Research and Study Center, University at Albany.
24. Gelzheiser, L. M., Scanlon, D. M., & Hallgren-Flynn, L. (2008). Interactive strategies approach- extended teacher handbook. Albany, NY: Child Research and Study Center, University at Albany.
25. Gelzheiser, L. M., Scanlon, D. M., & Hallgren-Flynn, L. (2009). Interactive strategies approach- extended curriculum guide. Albany, NY: Child Research and Study Center, University at Albany.
26. Gelzheiser, L. M., Scanlon, D. M., & Hallgren-Flynn, L. (2010). Spotlight on RTI for adolescents: An example of intensive middle school intervention using the interactive strategies approach- extended. In M. Y. Lipson & K. K. Wixson (Eds.), Successful approaches to RTI: Collaborative practices for improving K-12 literacy (pp. 211-230). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
27. Gresham, F. M. (2002). Responsiveness to intervention: An alternative approach to the identification of learning disabilities. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities (pp. 467-519). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Guthrie, J. T., & Humenick, N. M. (2004). Motivating students to read: Evidence for classroom practices that increase reading motivation and achievement. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 329-354). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
29. Guthrie, J. T., McRae, A., Coddington, C. S., Klauda, S. L., Wigfield, A., & Barbosa, P. (2009). Impacts of comprehensive reading instruction on diverse outcomes of low- and high-achieving readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(3), 195-214.
30. Guthrie, J. T., McRae, A., & Klauda, S. L. (2007). Contributions of concept-oriented reading instruction to knowledge about interventions for motivations in reading. Educational Psychology, 42(4), 237-250.
31. Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. A. (2006, April). ORF norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. Reading Teacher, 59(7), 636-644.
32. Hiebert, E. H., & Martin, L. A. (2009). Opportunity to read: A critical but neglected construct in reading instruction. In E. H. Hiebert (Ed.), Reading more, reading better (pp. 3-29). New York: Guilford.
33. Hirsch, E. D., Jr. (2003, Spring). Reading comprehension requires knowledge-of words and the world. American Educator, 10-29.
34. Hock, M. F., Brasseur, I. F., Deshler, D. D., Catts, H. W., Marquis, J. G., Mark, C. A, & Stribling, J. W. (2009). What is the reading component skill profile of adolescent struggling readers in urban schools? Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 32, 21-38.
35. International Reading Association. (2008). A critical analysis of eight informal reading inventories. Reading Rockets. Retrieved from http://www.readingrockets.org/article/23373
36. James-Burdumy, S., Mansfield, W., Deke, J., Carey, N., Lugo-Gil, J., Hershey, A., Endleton, A. (2009, May). Effectiveness of selected supplemental reading comprehension interventions: Impacts on a first cohort of fifth-grade students. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
37. Kamil, M. L., Borman, G. D., Dole, J., Kral, C. C, Salinger, T., & Torgeson, J. (2008, August). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
38. Keenan, J. M., & Betjemann, R. S. (2006). Comprehending the Gray Oral Reading Test without reading it: Why comprehension tests should not contain passage-independent items. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(4), 363-380.
39. Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S., & Olson, R. K. (2008). Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 281-300.
40. Klingner, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (1999). Promoting reading comprehension, content learning, and English acquisition through collaborative strategic reading (CSR). Reading Teacher, 52, 738- 747.
41. Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95,1-19.
42. Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J. (2006). Qualitative Reading Inventory-4. Boston: Pearson.
43. McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., & Blake, R. G. K. (2009). Rethinking reading comprehension instruction: A comparison of instruction for strategies and content approaches. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(3), 218-253.
44. McLoyd, V. C. (1979). The effects of extrinsic rewards of differential value on high and low intrinsic interest. Child Development, 50,1010-1019.
45. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
46. O'Connor, R., White, A., & Swanson, H. L. (2007). Repeated reading versus continuous reading: Influences on reading fluency and comprehension. Exceptional Children, 74(1), 31-46.
47. Paris, S. G., Carpenter, R. D., Paris, A. H., & Hamilton, E. E. (2005). Spurious and genuine correlates of children's reading comprehension. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children's reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 131-160). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Pearson, P. D., & Hamm, D. N. (2005). The assessment of reading comprehension: A review of practices-past, present, and future. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children's reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 13-70). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227-247). Oxford: Blackwell.
50. Riddle-Buly, M., & Valencia, S. (2002). Below the bar: Profiles of students who fail state reading assessments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 219-239.
51. Scammacca, N., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., Edmonds, M., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (2007). Interventions for adolescent struggling readers: A meta-analysis with implications for practice. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corp.
52. Scanlon, D. M., Anderson, K. L., & Sweeney, J. M. (2010). Early intervention for reading difficulties: The interactive strategies approach. New York: Guilford.
53. Scanlon, D. M., Gelzheiser, L. M., Vellutino, F. R., Schatschneider, C, & Sweeney, J. M. (2008). Reducing the incidence of early reading difficulties: Professional development for classroom teachers vs. direct interventions for children. Learning and Individual Differences, 18,346-359.
54. Scanlon, D. M., Vellutino, F. R., Small, S. G., Fanuele, D., & Sweeney, J. (2005). Severe reading difficulties: Can they be prevented? A comparison of prevention and intervention approaches. Exceptionality, 13(4), 209-227.
55. Shanahan, T., Kamil, M. L., & Tobin, A. W. (1983). Cloze as a measure of intersentential comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 229-255.
56. Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55,151-218.
57. Simmons, D., Coyne, M., Kwok, O., Hagan-Burke, S., & Kim, M. (2010). The impact of modifying early reading intervention based on kindergartners' response. Paper presented at the Institute for Education Sciences Research Conference, National Harbor, MD.
58. Snow, C. E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program for reading comprehension. Arlington, VA: RAND.
59. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
60. Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voeller, K. K. S., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction in children with severe reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(1), 33-58.
61. Valencia, S. W., Smith, A. T., Reece, A. M., Li, M., Wixson, K., & Newman, H. (2010). Oral reading fluency assessment: Issues of construct, criterion and consequential validity. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 270-291.
62. Vaughn, S., Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Denton, C. A., Wanzek, J., Wexler, J., Romain, M. (2008). Response to intervention with older students with reading difficulties. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 338-345.
63. Vellutino, F. R., & Scanlon, D. M. (2002). The Interactive Strategies Approach to reading intervention. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 573-635.
64. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Sipay, E. R., Small, S. G., Pratt, A., Chen, R., & Denckla, M. B. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult to remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601-638.
65. Wagner, R. K., Muse, A. E., & Tannenbaum, K. R. (2007). Promising avenues for better understanding implications of vocabulary development for reading comprehension. In R. K. Wagner, A. E. Muse, & K. R. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension (pp. 276-291). New York: Guilford.
66. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.