Overstrength and force reduction factors of multistorey reinforced-concrete buildings

Structural Design of Tall Buildings

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 329-351

  Elnashai, A S ^a   Mwafy, A M ^b  

^a University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

^b ZAGAZIG UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEARING CAPACITY; BUILDING CODES; DUCTILITY; NUMERICAL METHODS; REINFORCED CONCRETE; STIFFNESS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

FORCE REDUCTION FACTORS; LATERAL CAPACITY; MULTISTOREY REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS; OVERSTRENGTH FACTORS;

TALL BUILDINGS;

EID: 0037116399     PISSN: 10628002     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tal.204     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. ATC (Applied Technology Council). 1995. Structural response modification factors. Report ATC-19. Redwood City, CA.
2. Bozorgnia Y, Mahin SA, Brady AG. 1998. Vertical response of twelve structures recorded during the Northridge earthquake. Earthquake Spectra 14(3): 411-432.
3. Broderick BM, Elsnashai AS. 1994. Seismic resistance of composite beam-columns in multi-storey structures, part 2: analytical model and discussion of results. Journal of Construction Steel Research 30(3): 231-258.
4. Broderick BM, Elnashai AS. 1996. Seismic response of composite frames-I. Response criteria and input motions. Engineering Structures 18(9): 696-706.
5. Broderick BM, Elnashai AS, Izzuddin BA. 1994. Observations on the effect of numerical dissipation on the nonlinear dynamic response of structural systems. Engineering Structures 16(1): 51-61.
6. CCBFC (Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Code). 1995. National building code of Canada 1995, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.
7. CEN (Comite European de Normalisation). 1994. Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures, part 1-1, 1-2 and 1-3. Eurocode 8, European pre-standard ENV 1998-1-1, 1-2 and 1-3. CEN, Bruxelles.
8. Elnashai AS, Elghazouli AY. 1993. Performance of composite steel/concrete members under earthquake loading, part I: analytical model. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 22(4): 314-345.
9. Elnashai AS, Izzuddin BA. 1993. Modelling of material nonlinearities in steel structures subjected to transient dynamic loading. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 22: 509-532.
10. Fardis MN. 1994. Analysis and design of 26 reinforced concrete buildings according to Eurocodes 2 & 8. Configuration 3, 5 and 6. Report on Prenormative Research in Support of Eurocode 8, University of Patras, Greece.
11. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 1997. NEHRP provisions for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Report FEMA 273 (Guidelines) and 274 (Commentary). FEMA, Washington, DC.
12. Fischinger M, Fajfar P. 1990. On the response modification factors for reinforced concrete buildings. 4th US NCEE. Palm Springs 2: 249-258.
13. Fischinger M, Fajfar P, Vidic T. 1994. Factors contributing to the response reduction. 5th US NCEE. Chicago 97-106.
14. Housner G. 1952. Spectrum intensities of strong-motion earthquakes. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Earthquake and Blast Effects on Structures. Los Angeles, Calif: 20-36, American Society of Civil Engineers.
15. Humar JL, Ragozar MA. 1996. Concept of overstrength in seismic design. In Proceedings 11th WCEE. IAEE, Acapulco, Mexico. Paper 639.
16. IAEE (International Association for Earthquake Engineering). 1992. Earthquake Resistant Regulations. A World List. IAEE, Tokyo, Japan.
17. Izzuddin BA, Elnashai AS. 1989. ADAPTIC-a program for static and dynamic analysis of structures by adaptive mesh refinement, user manual. ESEE Report 89-7. Imperial College, London.
18. Jain SK, Navin N. 1995. Seismic overstrength in reinforced concrete frames. ASCE 121(3): 580-585.
19. Li R, Pourzanjani M. 1999. Sensitivity of building response to nonlinear analysis models. The Structural Design of Tall Buildings 8: 15-35.
20. Martinez-Rueda JE, Elnashai AS. 1997. Confined concrete model under cyclic load. Materials and Structures 30(197): 139-147.
21. Mitchell D, Paulter P. 1994. Ductility and overstrength in seismic design of reinforced concrete structures. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 21: 1049-1060.
22. Mwafy AM. 2000. Seismic Performance of Code-designed RC Buildings. PhD thesis, Imperial College, London.
23. Mwafy AM, Elnashai AS 2001. Static pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildings. Engineering Structures 23: 407-424.
24. Panagiotakos TB, Fardis MN. 1998. Effect of column capacity design on earthquake response of reinforced concrete buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2(1): 113-145.
25. Papazoglou AJ, Elnashai AS. 1996. Analytical and field evidence of the damaging effect of vertical earthquake ground motion. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 25: 1109-1137.
26. Park R. 1988. State-of-the art report: ductility evaluation from laboratory and analytical testing. In Proceedings 9th WCEE, IAEE, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan VIII: 605-616.
27. Park R. 1996. Explicit incorporation of element and structure overstrength in the design process. In Proceedings 11th WCEE, IAEE, Acapulco, Mexico. Paper 2130.
28. Paulay T, Priestley MJN. 1992. Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings. John Wiley, New York.
29. Pinho R. 2000. Selective Repair and Strengthening of RC Buildings. PhD thesis, Imperial College, London.
30. Priestley MJN, Verma R, Xiao Y. 1994. Seismic shear strength of reinforced concrete columns. ASCE 120(8): 2310-2329.
31. SEAOC (Structural Engineers Association of California). 1995. Performance based seismic engineering of buildings. Vision 2000 Committee, SEAOC Sacramento, CA.
32. SNZ (Standards New Zealand). 1992. General structural design and design loadings for buildings. NZS 4203: 1992, Standards New Zealand, Wellington.
33. d factors for building seismic provisions. ASCE 117(1): 19-28.
34. UBC (Uniform Building Code). 1997. International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, CA.
35. Whittaker A, Hart G, Rojahn C. 1999. Seismic response modification factors. ASCE 125(4): 438-444.