The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structure

Engineering Structures

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 289-303

  Kwon, Oh Sung ^a   Elnashai, Amr ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Ground motion uncertainty; Material uncertainty; Ordinary moment resisting concrete frame; Seismic vulnerability

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION; EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMOLOGY; STATISTICAL METHODS; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS; STRUCTURAL FRAMES; YIELD STRESS;

GROUND MOTION UNCERTAINTY; MATERIAL UNCERTAINTY; ORDINARY MOMENT RESISTING CONCRETE FRAME; SEISMIC VULNERABILITY CURVES;

EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE;

EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

EID: 28444465483     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.07.010     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. ATC-13 Earthquake damage evaluation data for california 1985 Applied Technology Council Redwood City (Palo Alto, California)
2. ATC-40 Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings 1997 Applied Technology Council Redwood City (Palo Alto, California)
3. F.M. Barlett J.G. MacGregor Statistical analysis of the compressive strength of concrete in structures ACI Material J 93 2 1996 158-168
4. J.J. Bommer A. Martinez-Pereira The effective duration of earthquake strong motion J Earthq Eng 3 2 1999 127-172
5. B. Borzi G.M. Calvi A.S. Elnashai E. Faccioli J.J. Bommer Inelastic spectra for displacement-based seismic design Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 21 1 2001 47-61
6. Bracci JM, Reinhorn AM, Mander JB. Seismic resistance of reinforced concrete frame structures designed only for gravity loads: Part I - design and properties of a one-third scale model structure. Technical report NCEER-92-0027. 1992
7. B.M. Broderick A.S. Elnashai Seismic resistance of composite beam-columns in multi-storey structures, part 2: Analytical model and discussion of results J Construct Steel Res 30 3 1994 231-258
8. Chopra AK, Goel RK. Capacity-demand-diagram methods for estimating seismic deformation of inelastic structures: SDF systems. Report No. PEER-1999/02. Berkeley: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California; 1999
9. M.K. Chryssanthopoulos C. Dymiotis A.J. Kappos Probabilistic evaluation of behaviour factors in EC8-designed R/C frames Eng Struct 22 8 2000 1028-1041
10. Drosos VA. Synthesis of earthquake ground motions for the new madrid seismic zone. MS thesis. Atlanta (GA): Georgia Institute of Technology; 2003
11. A.S. Elnashai Do we really need inelastic dynamic analysis? J Earthq Eng 6 1 2002 123-130
12. Elnashai AS. Next generation vulnerability functions for RC structures. In: Proceeding 'response of structures to extreme loading'. 2003
13. Elnashai AS, Papanikolaou V, Lee D. Zeus NL - a system for inelastic analysis of structures. Mid-America Earthquake Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Program Release September 2002; 2002
14. A.S. Elnashai A.Y. Elghazouli Performance of composite steel/concrete members under earthquake loading, Part I: Analytical model Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 22 4 1993 314-345
15. A.S. Elnashai B.A. Izzuddin Modeling of material nonlinearities in steel structures subjected to transient dynamic loading Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 22 1993 509-532
16. FEMA 273 NEHRP guidelines for seismic rehabilitation of buildings 1997 Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington (DC)
17. S.H Jeong A.S. Elnashai Analytical assessment of an irregular RC frame for full-scale 3D pseudo-dynamic testing, Part I: Analytical model verification J Earthq Eng 9 1 2005 95-128
18. S.H Jeong A.S. Elnashai Analytical assessment of an irregular RC frame for full-scale 3D pseudo-dynamic testing, Part II: Condition assessment and test deployment J Earthq Eng 9 2 2005 265-284
19. Kappos A, Pitilakis K, Stylianidis K, Morfidis K, Asimakopoulos D. Cost-benefit analysis for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings in Thessaloniki, based on a hybrid method of vulnerability assessment. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on seismic zonation, vol. I, Nantes (France): Ouest editions; 1995. p. 406-13
20. J.E. Martinez-Rueda A.S. Elnashai Confined concrete model under cyclic load Mater Struct 30 197 1997 139-147
21. K.M. Mosalam G. Ayala R.N. White C. Roth Seismic fragility of LRC frames with and without masonry infill walls J Earthq Eng 1 4 1997 693-720
22. S.A. Mirza J.G. MacGregor Variability of mechanical properties of reinforcing bars J Struc Div 105 ST5 1979
23. NIBS. HAZUS, Earthquake loss estimation technology. Technical manual prepared by the National Institute of Buildings Sciences (NIBS) for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 1999
24. G. Orsini A model for buildings' vulnerability assessment using the parameterless scale of seismic intensity (PSI) Earthq Spec 15 3 1999 463-483
25. Pinho R. Selective repair and strengthening of RC buildings. Ph.D. thesis. Imperial College, London; 2000
26. Reinhorn AM, Barron-Corvera R, Ayala AG. Spectral evaluation of seismic fragility of structures structural safety and reliability. In: ICOSSAR 2001. 2001
27. T. Rossetto A. Elnashai Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data Eng Struct 25 10 2003 1241-1263
28. Sawada T, Hirao K, Yamamoto H, Tsujihara O. Relation between maximum amplitude ratio and spectral parameters of earthquake ground motion. In: Proc. 10th world conf. on earthquake engineering, vol. 2. 1992, p. 617-22
29. M.D. Trifunac A.G. Brady A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion Bull Seismol Soc Amer 65 3 1975 581-626
30. Wen YK, Ellingwood BR, Veneziano D, Bracci J. Uncertainty modeling in earthquake engineering. Mid-America Earthquake Center Project FD-2 report. January; 2003
31. T.J. Zhu A.C. Heidebrecht W.K. Tso Effect of peak ground acceleration to velocity ratio on ductility demand of inelastic systems Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 16 1988 63-79